265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28343350)
1. An exploration of differences between Japan and two European countries in the self-reporting and valuation of pain and discomfort on the EQ-5D.
Feng Y; Herdman M; van Nooten F; Cleeland C; Parkin D; Ikeda S; Igarashi A; Devlin NJ
Qual Life Res; 2017 Aug; 26(8):2067-2078. PubMed ID: 28343350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing the health of the general population in England: how do the three- and five-level versions of EQ-5D compare?
Feng Y; Devlin N; Herdman M
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2015 Oct; 13():171. PubMed ID: 26489956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validity of EQ-5D-5L health-related quality of life questionnaire in self-reported diabetes: evidence from a general population survey.
Jankowska A; Młyńczak K; Golicki D
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2021 May; 19(1):138. PubMed ID: 33952271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Parallel Valuation of the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L by Time Trade-Off in Hungary.
Rencz F; Brodszky V; Gulácsi L; Golicki D; Ruzsa G; Pickard AS; Law EH; Péntek M
Value Health; 2020 Sep; 23(9):1235-1245. PubMed ID: 32940242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of different valuation methods for population health status measured by the EQ-5D in three European countries.
Bernert S; Fernández A; Haro JM; König HH; Alonso J; Vilagut G; Sevilla-Dedieu C; de Graaf R; Matschinger H; Heider D; Angermeyer MC;
Value Health; 2009; 12(5):750-8. PubMed ID: 19490564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Experience-Based Swedish TTO and VAS Value Sets for EQ-5D-5L Health States.
Burström K; Teni FS; Gerdtham UG; Leidl R; Helgesson G; Rolfson O; Henriksson M
Pharmacoeconomics; 2020 Aug; 38(8):839-856. PubMed ID: 32307663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Population norms for the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in Romania.
Olariu E; Caplescu R; Vale L; Niculescu-Aron IG; Oluboyede Y; Paveliu MS
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2023 Jul; 21(1):80. PubMed ID: 37507760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the EQ-5D-3L and 5L versions in low back pain patients.
Garratt AM; Furunes H; Hellum C; Solberg T; Brox JI; Storheim K; Johnsen LG
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2021 May; 19(1):155. PubMed ID: 34049574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Valuation of the EQ-5D-5L with composite time trade-off for the German population - an exploratory study.
Ludwig K; von der Schulenburg JG; Greiner W
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Feb; 15(1):39. PubMed ID: 28219389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Valuation of EuroQol Five-Dimensional Questionnaire, Youth Version (EQ-5D-Y) and EuroQol Five-Dimensional Questionnaire, Three-Level Version (EQ-5D-3L) Health States: The Impact of Wording and Perspective.
Kreimeier S; Oppe M; Ramos-Goñi JM; Cole A; Devlin N; Herdman M; Mulhern B; Shah KK; Stolk E; Rivero-Arias O; Greiner W
Value Health; 2018 Nov; 21(11):1291-1298. PubMed ID: 30442276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Choice Defines QALYs: A US Valuation of the EQ-5D-5L.
Craig BM; Rand K
Med Care; 2018 Jun; 56(6):529-536. PubMed ID: 29668646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validity of EQ-5D-5L in stroke.
Golicki D; Niewada M; Buczek J; Karlińska A; Kobayashi A; Janssen MF; Pickard AS
Qual Life Res; 2015 Apr; 24(4):845-50. PubMed ID: 25347978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Parallel Valuation: A Direct Comparison of EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L Societal Value Sets.
Law EH; Pickard AS; Xie F; Walton SM; Lee TA; Schwartz A
Med Decis Making; 2018 Nov; 38(8):968-982. PubMed ID: 30403577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. EQ-5D-5L norms for the urban Chinese population in China.
Yang Z; Busschbach J; Liu G; Luo N
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2018 Nov; 16(1):210. PubMed ID: 30409137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Self vs. other, child vs. adult. An experimental comparison of valuation perspectives for valuation of EQ-5D-Y-3L health states.
Lipman SA; Reckers-Droog VT; Karimi M; Jakubczyk M; Attema AE
Eur J Health Econ; 2021 Dec; 22(9):1507-1518. PubMed ID: 34611793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability and validity of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L in patients with osteoarthritis referred for hip and knee replacement.
Conner-Spady BL; Marshall DA; Bohm E; Dunbar MJ; Loucks L; Al Khudairy A; Noseworthy TW
Qual Life Res; 2015 Jul; 24(7):1775-84. PubMed ID: 25555837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of the scaling properties of the English, Spanish, French, and Chinese EQ-5D descriptive systems.
Luo N; Li M; Chevalier J; Lloyd A; Herdman M
Qual Life Res; 2013 Oct; 22(8):2237-43. PubMed ID: 23266797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Differential Psychometric Properties of EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level and Short-Form 6-Dimension Utility Measures in Low Back Pain.
Cheung PWH; Wong CKH; Cheung JPY
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Jun; 44(11):E679-E686. PubMed ID: 30475342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is EQ-5D-5L Better Than EQ-5D-3L? A Head-to-Head Comparison of Descriptive Systems and Value Sets from Seven Countries.
Janssen MF; Bonsel GJ; Luo N
Pharmacoeconomics; 2018 Jun; 36(6):675-697. PubMed ID: 29470821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Valuing health-related quality of life: An EQ-5D-5L value set for England.
Devlin NJ; Shah KK; Feng Y; Mulhern B; van Hout B
Health Econ; 2018 Jan; 27(1):7-22. PubMed ID: 28833869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
