BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

673 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28343677)

  • 1. Influence of adhesive cementation systems on the bond strength of relined fiber posts to root dentin.
    Rodrigues RV; Sampaio CS; Pacheco RR; Pascon FM; Puppin-Rontani RM; Giannini M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Oct; 118(4):493-499. PubMed ID: 28343677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Push-out bond strengths of different dental cements used to cement glass fiber posts.
    Pereira JR; Lins do Valle A; Ghizoni JS; Lorenzoni FC; Ramos MB; Dos Reis Só MV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 23929375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bond strength between root dentin and three glass-fiber post systems.
    Kalkan M; Usumez A; Ozturk AN; Belli S; Eskitascioglu G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jul; 96(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 16872929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of silane application on luting fiber posts using self-adhesive resin cement.
    Leme AA; Pinho AL; de Gonçalves L; Correr-Sobrinho L; Sinhoreti MA
    J Adhes Dent; 2013 Jun; 15(3):269-74. PubMed ID: 23534023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Customized Fiber Post Improves the Bond Strength and Dentinal Penetrability of Resin Cementation System to Root Dentin.
    Leandrin TP; Fernández E; Lima RO; Besegato JF; Escalante-Otárola WG; Kuga MC
    Oper Dent; 2022 Jan; 47(1):E22-E34. PubMed ID: 34969119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of Relining Post on the Bond Strength of Resin Cements.
    Conde DM; Rodrigues VP; Carvalho Souza Sde F; Bauer JR; Bramante Fda S; Linares Lima SN; Filho EM; Bandeca MC; de Mendonça AA; Lima DM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Jul; 16(7):559-64. PubMed ID: 26329411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multi-step adhesive cementation versus one-step adhesive cementation: push-out bond strength between fiber post and root dentin before and after mechanical cycling.
    Amaral M; Rippe MP; Bergoli CD; Monaco C; Valandro LF
    Gen Dent; 2011; 59(5):e185-91. PubMed ID: 22313828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of resin cement system and root region on the push-out bond strength of a translucent fiber post.
    Calixto LR; Bandéca MC; Clavijo V; Andrade MF; Vaz LG; Campos EA
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 21942240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Longevity of bond strength of resin cements to root dentine after radiation therapy.
    Yamin PA; Pereira RD; Lopes FC; Queiroz AM; Oliveira HF; Saquy PC; Sousa-Neto MD
    Int Endod J; 2018 Nov; 51(11):1301-1312. PubMed ID: 29729026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microtensile bond strength of photoactivated and autopolymerized adhesive systems to root dentin using translucent and opaque fiber-reinforced composite posts.
    Mallmann A; Jacques LB; Valandro LF; Muench A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Mar; 97(3):165-72. PubMed ID: 17394915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of relining on fiber post retention to root canal.
    Faria-e-Silva AL; Pedrosa-Filho Cde F; Menezes Mde S; Silveira DM; Martins LR
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2009; 17(6):600-4. PubMed ID: 20027434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of resin cement and post configuration on bond strength to root dentine.
    Soares CJ; Pereira JC; Valdivia AD; Novais VR; Meneses MS
    Int Endod J; 2012 Feb; 45(2):136-45. PubMed ID: 21995296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of provisional intraradicular retainers cementation with temporary methacrylate-based resin in the bond strength of glass fiber posts to root dentin.
    Rosa E Silva VL; Silva FASD; Alves Dos Santos GN; Assis HC; Souza-Gabriel AE; Silva-Sousa YTC; Lopes-Olhê FC; Sousa-Neto MD; Mazzi-Chaves JF
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Nov; 135():105486. PubMed ID: 36182677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Regional bond strengths to root canal dentin of fiber posts luted with three cementation systems.
    Gomes GM; Gomes OM; Reis A; Gomes JC; Loguercio AD; Calixto AL
    Braz Dent J; 2011; 22(6):460-7. PubMed ID: 22189640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bond strength of prefabricated and CAD-CAM milled glass fiber post-and-cores luted with conventional, universal, and self-adhesive composite resin cement.
    Cheniski DA; Freire A; Camargo ES; da Costa RG; de Souza EM; Rached RN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Feb; 131(2):251.e1-251.e7. PubMed ID: 38368000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pull-out bond strength of a fibre-reinforced composite post system luted with self-adhesive resin cements.
    Nova V; Karygianni L; Altenburger MJ; Wolkewitz M; Kielbassa AM; Wrbas KT
    J Dent; 2013 Nov; 41(11):1020-6. PubMed ID: 24007789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effectiveness of glass ionomer cement as a fiber post cementation system in endodontically treated teeth.
    Lorenzetti CC; Bortolatto JF; Ramos ATPR; Shinohara AL; Saad JRC; Kuga MC
    Microsc Res Tech; 2019 Jul; 82(7):1191-1197. PubMed ID: 30920097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of adhesive resin cement, obturation material and root dentin location on the retention of glass fiber-reinforced composite resin posts.
    Albashaireh ZS; Bashaireh BY; El Masoud BM
    Am J Dent; 2023 Dec; 36(6):297-302. PubMed ID: 38092747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An in vitro comparison of different cementation strategies on the pull-out strength of a glass fiber post.
    Amaral M; Santini MF; Wandscher V; Amaral R; Valandro LF
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(4):443-51. PubMed ID: 19678450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of root dentin treatment on the push-out bond strength of fiber posts.
    Baena E; Flores A; Ceballos L
    Odontology; 2017 Apr; 105(2):170-177. PubMed ID: 27206914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.