BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

387 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28344341)

  • 1. Functional variomics and network perturbation: connecting genotype to phenotype in cancer.
    Yi S; Lin S; Li Y; Zhao W; Mills GB; Sahni N
    Nat Rev Genet; 2017 Jul; 18(7):395-410. PubMed ID: 28344341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gain-of-Function Variomics and Multi-omics Network Biology for Precision Medicine.
    Li MM; Awasthi S; Ghosh S; Bisht D; Coban Akdemir ZH; Sheynkman GM; Sahni N; Yi SS
    Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2660():357-372. PubMed ID: 37191809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. e-MutPath: computational modeling reveals the functional landscape of genetic mutations rewiring interactome networks.
    Li Y; Burgman B; Khatri IS; Pentaparthi SR; Su Z; McGrail DJ; Li Y; Wu E; Eckhardt SG; Sahni N; Yi SS
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2021 Jan; 49(1):e2. PubMed ID: 33211847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Edgotype: a fundamental link between genotype and phenotype.
    Sahni N; Yi S; Zhong Q; Jailkhani N; Charloteaux B; Cusick ME; Vidal M
    Curr Opin Genet Dev; 2013 Dec; 23(6):649-57. PubMed ID: 24287335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative analysis of protein interactome networks prioritizes candidate genes with cancer signatures.
    Li Y; Sahni N; Yi S
    Oncotarget; 2016 Nov; 7(48):78841-78849. PubMed ID: 27791983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pathway networks generated from human disease phenome.
    Cirincione AG; Clark KL; Kann MG
    BMC Med Genomics; 2018 Sep; 11(Suppl 3):75. PubMed ID: 30255817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gain-of-Function Mutations: An Emerging Advantage for Cancer Biology.
    Li Y; Zhang Y; Li X; Yi S; Xu J
    Trends Biochem Sci; 2019 Aug; 44(8):659-674. PubMed ID: 31047772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Introduction: Cancer Gene Networks.
    Clarke R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1513():1-9. PubMed ID: 27807826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Network analysis and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA): a new horizon for the understanding of disease pathogenesis and therapeutic target identification.
    Donn R; De Leonibus C; Meyer S; Stevens A
    Pediatr Rheumatol Online J; 2016 Jul; 14(1):40. PubMed ID: 27411317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genotype networks shed light on evolutionary constraints.
    Wagner A
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2011 Nov; 26(11):577-84. PubMed ID: 21840080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Structural and Functional Characterization of a Caenorhabditis elegans Genetic Interaction Network within Pathways.
    Boucher B; Lee AY; Hallett M; Jenna S
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2016 Feb; 12(2):e1004738. PubMed ID: 26871911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cancer networks and beyond: interpreting mutations using the human interactome and protein structure.
    Gulati S; Cheng TM; Bates PA
    Semin Cancer Biol; 2013 Aug; 23(4):219-26. PubMed ID: 23680723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Integration of genomic information with biological networks using Cytoscape.
    Bauer-Mehren A
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1021():37-61. PubMed ID: 23715979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. TP53 mutations, expression and interaction networks in human cancers.
    Wang X; Sun Q
    Oncotarget; 2017 Jan; 8(1):624-643. PubMed ID: 27880943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Belief propagation in genotype-phenotype networks.
    Moharil J; May P; Gaile DP; Blair RH
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2016 Mar; 15(1):39-53. PubMed ID: 26910752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Large-scale datasets uncovering cell signalling networks in cancer: context matters.
    Sharma S; Petsalaki E
    Curr Opin Genet Dev; 2019 Feb; 54():118-124. PubMed ID: 31200172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gene networks underlying convergent and pleiotropic phenotypes in a large and systematically-phenotyped cohort with heterogeneous developmental disorders.
    Andrews T; Meader S; Vulto-van Silfhout A; Taylor A; Steinberg J; Hehir-Kwa J; Pfundt R; de Leeuw N; de Vries BB; Webber C
    PLoS Genet; 2015 Mar; 11(3):e1005012. PubMed ID: 25781962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interpretation of genomic variants using a unified biological network approach.
    Khurana E; Fu Y; Chen J; Gerstein M
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2013; 9(3):e1002886. PubMed ID: 23505346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simplistic pathways or complex networks?
    Jørgensen C; Linding R
    Curr Opin Genet Dev; 2010 Feb; 20(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 20096559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In silico perturbation of drug targets in pan-cancer analysis combining multiple networks and pathways.
    Cava C; Castiglioni I
    Gene; 2019 May; 698():100-106. PubMed ID: 30840853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.