These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28344546)

  • 1. Choosing MUSE: Validation of a Low-Cost, Portable EEG System for ERP Research.
    Krigolson OE; Williams CC; Norton A; Hassall CD; Colino FL
    Front Neurosci; 2017; 11():109. PubMed ID: 28344546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using Muse: Rapid Mobile Assessment of Brain Performance.
    Krigolson OE; Hammerstrom MR; Abimbola W; Trska R; Wright BW; Hecker KG; Binsted G
    Front Neurosci; 2021; 15():634147. PubMed ID: 33584194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Event-related brain potentials and the study of reward processing: Methodological considerations.
    Krigolson OE
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Oct; 132(Pt B):175-183. PubMed ID: 29154804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acquiring research-grade ERPs on a shoestring budget: A comparison of a modified Emotiv and commercial SynAmps EEG system.
    Barham MP; Clark GM; Hayden MJ; Enticott PG; Conduit R; Lum JAG
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Sep; 54(9):1393-1404. PubMed ID: 28497557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of Prefrontal Single-Channel EEG Data for Portable Auditory ERP-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces.
    Ogino M; Kanoga S; Muto M; Mitsukura Y
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2019; 13():250. PubMed ID: 31404255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How low can you go? Measuring human event-related brain potentials from a two-channel EEG system.
    Boere K; Parsons E; Binsted G; Krigolson OE
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2023 May; 187():20-26. PubMed ID: 36813238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Beyond the FRN: Broadening the time-course of EEG and ERP components implicated in reward processing.
    Glazer JE; Kelley NJ; Pornpattananangkul N; Mittal VA; Nusslock R
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Oct; 132(Pt B):184-202. PubMed ID: 29454641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. P300-based brain-computer interface (BCI) event-related potentials (ERPs): People with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) vs. age-matched controls.
    McCane LM; Heckman SM; McFarland DJ; Townsend G; Mak JN; Sellers EW; Zeitlin D; Tenteromano LM; Wolpaw JR; Vaughan TM
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Nov; 126(11):2124-31. PubMed ID: 25703940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantifying fast optical signal and event-related potential relationships during a visual oddball task.
    Proulx N; Samadani AA; Chau T
    Neuroimage; 2018 Sep; 178():119-128. PubMed ID: 29777826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A validation of Emotiv EPOC Flex saline for EEG and ERP research.
    Williams NS; McArthur GM; de Wit B; Ibrahim G; Badcock NA
    PeerJ; 2020; 8():e9713. PubMed ID: 32864218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The relationship between ERP components and EEG spatial complexity in a visual Go/Nogo task.
    Jia H; Li H; Yu D
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Jan; 117(1):275-283. PubMed ID: 27784803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interactive ERP recording increases the amplitude of the endogenous P300 peak in schizophrenia.
    Price GW
    Schizophr Res; 2000 Feb; 41(3):463-72. PubMed ID: 10728723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of cognitive load on reward evaluation.
    Krigolson OE; Hassall CD; Satel J; Klein RM
    Brain Res; 2015 Nov; 1627():225-32. PubMed ID: 26431993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prestimulus EEG amplitude determinants of ERP responses in a habituation paradigm.
    De Blasio FM; Barry RJ; Steiner GZ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Sep; 89(3):444-50. PubMed ID: 23732790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Increasing the mobility of EEG data collection using a Latte Panda computer.
    Kuziek JWP; Redman EX; Splinter GD; Mathewson KE
    J Neurosci Methods; 2018 Oct; 308():34-47. PubMed ID: 30031010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. EEG-dependent ERP recording: using TMS to increase the incidence of a selected pre-stimulus pattern.
    Price GW
    Brain Res Brain Res Protoc; 2004 Feb; 12(3):144-51. PubMed ID: 15013465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prolongation of ERP latency and reaction time (RT) in simultaneous EEG/fMRI data acquisition.
    Chun J; Peltier SJ; Yoon D; Manschreck TC; Deldin PJ
    J Neurosci Methods; 2016 Aug; 268():78-86. PubMed ID: 27172845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis and visualization of single-trial event-related potentials.
    Jung TP; Makeig S; Westerfield M; Townsend J; Courchesne E; Sejnowski TJ
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2001 Nov; 14(3):166-85. PubMed ID: 11559961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dissociable effects of reward and expectancy during evaluative feedback processing revealed by topographic ERP mapping analysis.
    Gheza D; Paul K; Pourtois G
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Oct; 132(Pt B):213-225. PubMed ID: 29179993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ready, set, explore! Event-related potentials reveal the time-course of exploratory decisions.
    Hassall CD; McDonald CG; Krigolson OE
    Brain Res; 2019 Sep; 1719():183-193. PubMed ID: 31152692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.