These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28344759)

  • 1. Susceptibility to Ebbinghaus and Müller-Lyer illusions in autistic children: a comparison of three different methods.
    Manning C; Morgan MJ; Allen CTW; Pellicano E
    Mol Autism; 2017; 8():16. PubMed ID: 28344759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Global processing during the Müller-Lyer illusion is distinctively affected by the degree of autistic traits in the typical population.
    Chouinard PA; Noulty WA; Sperandio I; Landry O
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Oct; 230(2):219-31. PubMed ID: 23864047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Superadditivity of the Ebbinghaus and Müller-Lyer illusions depends on the method of comparison used.
    Foster RM; Franz VH
    Perception; 2014; 43(8):783-95. PubMed ID: 25549508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Müller-Lyer Illusion susceptibility is conditionally predicted by autistic trait expression.
    Tailor G; Telles-Langdon DM; Glazebrook CM
    Exp Brain Res; 2024 Feb; 242(2):429-442. PubMed ID: 38147086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A specific autistic trait that modulates visuospatial illusion susceptibility.
    Walter E; Dassonville P; Bochsler TM
    J Autism Dev Disord; 2009 Feb; 39(2):339-49. PubMed ID: 18688703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dynamic presentation boosts the Ebbinghaus illusion but reduces the Müller-Lyer and orientation contrast illusions.
    Takao S; Watanabe K; Cavanagh P
    J Vis; 2021 Jun; 21(6):4. PubMed ID: 34110368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Susceptibility to Optical Illusions Varies as a Function of the Autism-Spectrum Quotient but not in Ways Predicted by Local-Global Biases.
    Chouinard PA; Unwin KL; Landry O; Sperandio I
    J Autism Dev Disord; 2016 Jun; 46(6):2224-2239. PubMed ID: 26914611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Size and direction of distortion in geometric-optical illusions: conciliation between the Müller-Lyer and Titchener configurations.
    Nemati F
    Perception; 2009; 38(11):1585-600. PubMed ID: 20120258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Susceptibility to the Shepard illusion in participants with autism: reduced top-down influences within perception?
    Mitchell P; Mottron L; Soulières I; Ropar D
    Autism Res; 2010 Jun; 3(3):113-9. PubMed ID: 20575110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Opposite effects of motion dynamics on the Ebbinghaus and corridor illusions.
    Mruczek REB; Blair CD; Cullen K; Caplovitz GP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1912-1927. PubMed ID: 31898067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of the Müller-Lyer configuration on saccadic eye movements is not fully due to illusory perception.
    Chen J; Yang P; Chen Z
    J Neurophysiol; 2020 Sep; 124(3):856-867. PubMed ID: 32783573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual perception in domestic dogs: susceptibility to the Ebbinghaus-Titchener and Delboeuf illusions.
    Byosiere SE; Feng LC; Woodhead JK; Rutter NJ; Chouinard PA; Howell TJ; Bennett PC
    Anim Cogn; 2017 May; 20(3):435-448. PubMed ID: 28008543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceptual similarity and the neural correlates of geometrical illusions in human brain structure.
    Axelrod V; Schwarzkopf DS; Gilaie-Dotan S; Rees G
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jan; 7():39968. PubMed ID: 28067329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Length illusions in conventional and single-wing Müller-Lyer stimuli.
    Predebon J
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Jul; 62(5):1086-98. PubMed ID: 10997051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are individuals with autism and Asperger's syndrome susceptible to visual illusions?
    Ropar D; Mitchell P
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 1999 Nov; 40(8):1283-93. PubMed ID: 10604406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stage-dependent sensitivity to Müller-Lyer visual illusion in schizophrenia patients.
    Costa ALL; Barros M; Mortari MR; Caixeta FV; Maior RS
    Behav Brain Res; 2023 Feb; 438():114173. PubMed ID: 36283565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visuomotor 'immunity' to perceptual illusion: a mismatch of attentional demands cannot explain the perception-action dissociation.
    Dewar MT; Carey DP
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(8):1501-8. PubMed ID: 16364378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Truth is in the eye of the beholder: Perception of the Müller-Lyer illusion in dogs.
    Keep B; Zulch HE; Wilkinson A
    Learn Behav; 2018 Dec; 46(4):501-512. PubMed ID: 30187301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Poggendorff and Müller-Lyer illusions: common effects.
    Greist-Bousquet S; Schiffman HR
    Perception; 1985; 14(4):427-47. PubMed ID: 3834386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contextual flanks' tilting and magnitude of illusion of extent.
    Bulatov A; Bertulis A; Mickienė L; Surkys T; Bielevičius A
    Vision Res; 2011 Jan; 51(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 20932991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.