These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2834549)
1. Use of computer tomography in subperiosteal implant therapy. Truitt HP; James R; Altman A; Boyne P J Prosthet Dent; 1988 Apr; 59(4):474-7. PubMed ID: 2834549 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Versatility of the subperiosteal implant utilizing CAD-CAM multiplanar diagnostic imaging. Benjamin LS J Oral Implantol; 1987; 13(2):282-96. PubMed ID: 3268687 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Advances in subperiosteal implant reconstruction. Boyne PJ; James RA Dent Clin North Am; 1986 Apr; 30(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 3009243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [X-ray data evaluation in planning operations of dental implantation in patients with different types of adentia]. Ivanov SIu; Goncharov IIu Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2006; 85(5):36-40. PubMed ID: 17159842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term retrospective studies on the CT-scan, CAD/CAM, one-stage surgery hydroxyapatite-coated subperiosteal implants, including human functional retrievals. Benjamin LS Dent Clin North Am; 1992 Jan; 36(1):77-93; discussion 94-5. PubMed ID: 1310663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Histologic evaluation of a retrieved human HA-coated subperiosteal implant: report of a case. Benjamin LS; Block MS Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1989; 4(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 2557282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Imaging techniques and their clinical significance. Pharoah MJ Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(2):176-9. PubMed ID: 8329095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of computerized tomography in preoperative assessment of the dental implant patient: literature review. Schardt D Conn Dent Stud J; 1991 Mar; 11():17-9. PubMed ID: 1819372 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The use of stereolithographic surgical templates in oral implantology. Cassetta M; Di Carlo S; Pranno N; Sorrentino V; Di Giorgio G; Pompa G Ann Ital Chir; 2013; 84(5):589-93. PubMed ID: 23685389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Pre-implantation evaluation using medical imagery: scanner or Scanora?]. Hanssens JF Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 1996; 51(2):101-10. PubMed ID: 9289749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combined use of subperiosteal implant and bone-marrow graft in deficient edentulous mandibles: a preliminary report. Kratochvil FJ; Boyne PJ J Prosthet Dent; 1972 Jun; 27(6):645-53. PubMed ID: 4555901 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Placement of a modified subperiosteal implant: a clinical solution to help those with no bone. Nazarian A Dent Today; 2014 Jul; 33(7):134, 136-7. PubMed ID: 25118530 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Subperiosteal implant in the treatment of the edentulous and partially edentulous mandible. Bloch VP J Bergen Cty Dent Soc; 1973 Dec; 40(3):5 passim. PubMed ID: 4527997 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Subperiosteal implant in the treatment of the edentulous and partially edentulous mandible. Bloch VP Trib Odontol (Guanabara); 1973; 5(25):5 passim. PubMed ID: 4526815 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]