These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28345946)

  • 1. Objective effects of knowledge on visual perception.
    Lupyan G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Apr; 43(4):794-806. PubMed ID: 28345946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can I order a burger at rnacdonalds.com? Visual similarity effects of multi-letter combinations at the early stages of word recognition.
    Marcet A; Perea M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 May; 44(5):699-706. PubMed ID: 29094993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence of Serial Processing in Visual Word Recognition.
    White AL; Palmer J; Boynton GM
    Psychol Sci; 2018 Jul; 29(7):1062-1071. PubMed ID: 29733752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. No flexibility in letter position coding in Korean.
    Rastle K; Lally C; Lee CH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Apr; 45(4):458-473. PubMed ID: 30762419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The independence of letter identity and letter doubling in reading.
    Fischer-Baum S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Jun; 24(3):873-878. PubMed ID: 27542802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Many ways to read your vowels--Neural processing of diacritics and vowel letters in Hebrew.
    Weiss Y; Katzir T; Bitan T
    Neuroimage; 2015 Nov; 121():10-9. PubMed ID: 26188258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. From orthography to phonetics: ERP measures of grapheme-to-phoneme conversion mechanisms in reading.
    Proverbio AM; Vecchi L; Zani A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Mar; 16(2):301-17. PubMed ID: 15068599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Individual variability in the semantic processing of English compound words.
    Schmidtke D; Van Dyke JA; Kuperman V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Mar; 44(3):421-439. PubMed ID: 28933895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of alphabet and expertise on letter perception.
    Wiley RW; Wilson C; Rapp B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1186-203. PubMed ID: 26913778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Combined effects of form- and meaning-based predictability on perceived clarity of speech.
    Signoret C; Johnsrude I; Classon E; Rudner M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Feb; 44(2):277-285. PubMed ID: 28557490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of letter spacing on reading: a test of the bigram coding hypothesis.
    Vinckier F; Qiao E; Pallier C; Dehaene S; Cohen L
    J Vis; 2011 May; 11(6):1-21. PubMed ID: 21566152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Word and pseudoword superiority effects in a shallow orthography language: the role of hemispheric lateralization.
    Ripamonti E; Traficante D; Crippa F; Luzzattii C
    Percept Mot Skills; 2014 Apr; 118(2):411-28. PubMed ID: 24897877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rapid extraction of gist from visual text and its influence on word recognition.
    Asano M; Yokosawa K
    J Gen Psychol; 2011; 138(2):127-54. PubMed ID: 21560469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. From word superiority to word inferiority: visual processing of letters and words in pure alexia.
    Habekost T; Petersen A; Behrmann M; Starrfelt R
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2014; 31(5-6):413-36. PubMed ID: 24801564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Phonological-orthographic consistency for Japanese words and its impact on visual and auditory word recognition.
    Hino Y; Kusunose Y; Miyamura S; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Jan; 43(1):126-146. PubMed ID: 27808550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Word position coding in reading is noisy.
    Snell J; Grainger J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Apr; 26(2):609-615. PubMed ID: 30798470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Word length, set size, and lexical factors: Re-examining what causes the word length effect.
    Guitard D; Gabel AJ; Saint-Aubin J; Surprenant AM; Neath I
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1824-1844. PubMed ID: 29672112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Morphological effects in visual word recognition: Children, adolescents, and adults.
    Dawson N; Rastle K; Ricketts J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Apr; 44(4):645-654. PubMed ID: 28956945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The letter height superiority illusion.
    New B; Doré-Mazars K; Cavézian C; Pallier C; Barra J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Feb; 23(1):291-8. PubMed ID: 26370216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. When orthography is not enough: The effect of lexical stress in lexical decision.
    Colombo L; Sulpizio S
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Jul; 43(5):811-24. PubMed ID: 25669628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.