These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28345946)

  • 21. Priming stress patterns in word recognition.
    Protopapas A; Panagaki E; Andrikopoulou A; Gutiérrez Palma N; Arvaniti A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1739-1760. PubMed ID: 27379871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. List constituency and orthographic and phonological processing: a shift to high familiarity words from low familiarity words.
    Rutherford BJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Dec; 65():74-81. PubMed ID: 25455570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Emerging neurophysiological specialization for letter strings.
    Maurer U; Brem S; Bucher K; Brandeis D
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Oct; 17(10):1532-52. PubMed ID: 16269095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Is orthographic information from multiple parafoveal words processed in parallel: An eye-tracking study.
    Cutter MG; Drieghe D; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Aug; 43(8):1550-1567. PubMed ID: 28383965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A delay in processing for repeated letters: Evidence from megastudies.
    Trifonova IV; Adelman JS
    Cognition; 2019 Aug; 189():227-241. PubMed ID: 31005639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Word and pseudoword superiority effects on letter position processing in developing and skilled readers.
    Kezilas Y; Kohnen S; McKague M; Robidoux S; Castles A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Dec; 42(12):1989-2002. PubMed ID: 27732042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reading sentences of uniform word length: Evidence for the adaptation of the preferred saccade length during reading.
    Cutter MG; Drieghe D; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Nov; 43(11):1895-1911. PubMed ID: 28406688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Perhaps correlational but not causal: no effect of dyslexic readers' magnocellular system on their eye movements during reading.
    Hutzler F; Kronbichler M; Jacobs AM; Wimmer H
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(4):637-48. PubMed ID: 16115655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Word and pseudoword superiority effects reflected in the ERP waveform.
    Coch D; Mitra P
    Brain Res; 2010 May; 1329():159-74. PubMed ID: 20211607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessing the influence of letter position in reading normal and transposed texts using a letter detection task.
    Guérard K; Saint-Aubin J; Poirier M; Demetriou C
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2012 Dec; 66(4):227-38. PubMed ID: 22686154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Modeling Polymorphemic Word Recognition: Exploring Differences Among Children With Early-Emerging and Late-Emerging Word Reading Difficulty.
    Kearns DM; Steacy LM; Compton DL; Gilbert JK; Goodwin AP; Cho E; Lindstrom ER; Collins AA
    J Learn Disabil; 2016 Jul; 49(4):368-94. PubMed ID: 25331757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Lexical knowledge boosts statistically-driven speech segmentation.
    Palmer SD; Hutson J; White L; Mattys SL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Jan; 45(1):139-146. PubMed ID: 29952630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Syllabic priming in lexical decision and naming tasks: the syllable congruency effect re-examined in French.
    Chetail F; Mathey S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Mar; 63(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 19271815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. ERP signatures of conscious and unconscious word and letter perception in an inattentional blindness paradigm.
    Schelonka K; Graulty C; Canseco-Gonzalez E; Pitts MA
    Conscious Cogn; 2017 Sep; 54():56-71. PubMed ID: 28506434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Increasing word distinctiveness eliminates the picture superiority effect in recognition: Evidence for the physical-distinctiveness account.
    Ensor TM; Surprenant AM; Neath I
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Jan; 47(1):182-193. PubMed ID: 30182328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. From complexity to distinctiveness: The effect of expertise on letter perception.
    Wiley RW; Rapp B
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Jun; 26(3):974-984. PubMed ID: 30478777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Visual information constrains early and late stages of spoken-word recognition in sentence context.
    Brunellière A; Sánchez-García C; Ikumi N; Soto-Faraco S
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):136-47. PubMed ID: 23797145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Oculomotor and linguistic processing effects in reading dynamic horizontally scrolling text.
    Harvey H; Godwin HJ; Fitzsimmons G; Liversedge SP; Walker R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Mar; 43(3):518-536. PubMed ID: 28080114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The role of allograph representations in font-invariant letter identification.
    Rothlein D; Rapp B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1411-1429. PubMed ID: 28368166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Misperception of orthographic neighbors during silent and oral reading.
    Gregg J; Inhoff AW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jun; 42(6):799-820. PubMed ID: 26727017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.