These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28345947)

  • 1. Distinct cognitive control mechanisms as revealed by modality-specific conflict adaptation effects.
    Yang G; Nan W; Zheng Y; Wu H; Li Q; Liu X
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Apr; 43(4):807-818. PubMed ID: 28345947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Functional characteristics of control adaptation in intermodal sensory processing.
    Melcher T; Pfister R; Busmann M; Schlüter MC; Leyhe T; Gruber O
    Brain Cogn; 2015 Jun; 96():43-55. PubMed ID: 25917247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cognitive control during a spatial Stroop task: Comparing conflict monitoring and prediction of response-outcome theories.
    Pires L; Leitão J; Guerrini C; Simões MR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Sep; 189():63-75. PubMed ID: 28683927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adjustment of control in the numerical Stroop task.
    Dadon G; Henik A
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Aug; 45(6):891-902. PubMed ID: 28337604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reward enhances cross-modal conflict control in object categorization: Electrophysiological evidence.
    Kang G; Chang W; Wang L; Wei P; Zhou X
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Nov; 55(11):e13214. PubMed ID: 30129668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cross-modal transfer after auditory task-switching training.
    Kattner F; Samaan L; Schubert T
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Jul; 47(5):1044-1061. PubMed ID: 30805872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contextual within-trial adaptation of cognitive control: Evidence from the combination of conflict tasks.
    Rey-Mermet A; Gade M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1505-32. PubMed ID: 27149295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An attentional mechanism for minimizing cross-modal distraction.
    Grant LD; Weissman DH
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Mar; 174():9-16. PubMed ID: 28126490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adaptation to conflict frequency without contingency and temporal learning: Evidence from the picture-word interference task.
    Spinelli G; Perry JR; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Aug; 45(8):995-1014. PubMed ID: 31144859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. It's more than just conflict: The functional role of congruency in the sequential control adaptation.
    Berger A; Fischer R; Dreisbach G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jun; 197():64-72. PubMed ID: 31103922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Carving executive control at its joints: Working memory capacity predicts stimulus-stimulus, but not stimulus-response, conflict.
    Meier ME; Kane MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1849-72. PubMed ID: 26120774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modality-specific neural mechanisms of cognitive control in a Stroop-like task.
    Li Z; Yang G; Wu H; Li Q; Xu H; Göschl F; Nolte G; Liu X
    Brain Cogn; 2021 Feb; 147():105662. PubMed ID: 33360042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neurodevelopment of conflict adaptation: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Liu X; Liu T; Shangguan F; Sørensen TA; Liu Q; Shi J
    Dev Psychol; 2018 Jul; 54(7):1347-1362. PubMed ID: 29756794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How does "not left" become "right"? Electrophysiological evidence for a dynamic conflict-bound negation processing account.
    Dudschig C; Kaup B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 May; 44(5):716-728. PubMed ID: 29154622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing adaptation in emotional and non-emotional conflict in patients with schizophrenia and borderline personality disorder.
    Hurtado MM; Triviño M; Panadero MA; Arnedo M; Tudela P
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Aug; 117():558-565. PubMed ID: 30025790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stop interfering: Stroop task conflict independence from informational conflict and interference.
    Kalanthroff E; Goldfarb L; Usher M; Henik A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(7):1356-67. PubMed ID: 23163896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The interaction between emotion and executive control: Comparison between visual, auditory, and tactile modalities.
    Fruchtman-Steinbok T; Salzer Y; Henik A; Cohen N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Aug; 70(8):1661-1674. PubMed ID: 27295071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Temporal and spectral profiles of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response conflict processing.
    Wang K; Li Q; Zheng Y; Wang H; Liu X
    Neuroimage; 2014 Apr; 89():280-8. PubMed ID: 24315839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Now you see it, now you don't: controlling for contingencies and stimulus repetitions eliminates the Gratton effect.
    Schmidt JR; De Houwer J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):176-86. PubMed ID: 21745649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Beyond trial-by-trial adaptation: A quantification of the time scale of cognitive control.
    Aben B; Verguts T; Van den Bussche E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Mar; 43(3):509-517. PubMed ID: 28080112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.