These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28345976)

  • 1. Evaluating the performance of a new carboxymethyl cellulose dressing in the community setting.
    Stephen-Haynes J; Callaghan R; Stephens C
    Br J Nurs; 2017 Mar; 26(6):S36-S41. PubMed ID: 28345976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical evaluation of a thin absorbent skin adhesive dressing for wound management.
    Stephen-Haynes J; Callaghan R; Wibaux A; Johnson P; Carty N
    J Wound Care; 2014 Nov; 23(11):532, 534, 536 passim. PubMed ID: 25375401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical safety and effectiveness evaluation of a new antimicrobial wound dressing designed to manage exudate, infection and biofilm.
    Metcalf DG; Parsons D; Bowler PG
    Int Wound J; 2017 Feb; 14(1):203-213. PubMed ID: 27004423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A clinical case-series evaluation of a superabsorbent dressing on exuding wounds.
    Hindhede A; Meuleneire F
    J Wound Care; 2012 Nov; 21(11):574, 576-80. PubMed ID: 23413497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of two absorbent silver dressings in a porcine partial-thickness excisional wound model.
    Bell A; Hart J
    J Wound Care; 2007 Nov; 16(10):445-8, 450-3. PubMed ID: 18065021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of a foam dressing for acute and chronic wound exudate management.
    Bullough L; Johnson S; Forder R
    Br J Community Nurs; 2015 Sep; Suppl Wound Care():S17-8, S20, S22-4. PubMed ID: 26322401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A next-generation antimicrobial wound dressing: a real-life clinical evaluation in the UK and Ireland.
    Metcalf D; Parsons D; Bowler P
    J Wound Care; 2016 Mar; 25(3):132, 134-8. PubMed ID: 26947693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A multicentre clinical evaluation of Cuticell Contact silicone wound contact layer in daily practice.
    Suess-Burghart A; Zomer K; Schwanke D
    Br J Community Nurs; 2015 Jun; Suppl Community Wound Care():S35-6, S38-41. PubMed ID: 26052993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical acceptability of a dressing with matrix technology: a multisite evaluation of acute and chronic wounds.
    Guthrie J; Potter R
    J Wound Care; 2016 Aug; 25(8):465-9. PubMed ID: 27523658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A multicentre, clinical evaluation of a hydro-responsive wound dressing: the Glasgow experience.
    Hodgson H; Davidson D; Duncan A; Guthrie J; Henderson E; MacDiarmid M; McGown K; Pollard V; Potter R; Rodgers A; Wilson A; Horner J; Doran M; Simm S; Taylor R; Rogers A; Rippon MG; Colgrave M
    J Wound Care; 2017 Nov; 26(11):642-650. PubMed ID: 29131748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Randomized Controlled Study Evaluating the Clinical Benefits of a Cellulose Acetate Mesh Coated with a Soft Silicone in the Management of Acute Wounds.
    Pierrefeu-Lagrange AC; Mari K; Hoss C; Cullen B; Nisbet L
    Wounds; 2018 Apr; 30(4):84-89. PubMed ID: 29521640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of a gelling fibre dressing in management of wounds in a community setting: a sub-analysis of the VIPES study.
    Klein A; Ayoub N; Juhel C; Schueller R; Armstrong F; Pegalajar-Jurado A
    J Wound Care; 2024 Jul; 33(7):464-473. PubMed ID: 38967346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance of a silicone foam dressing in management of wounds in a community setting: a sub-analysis of the VIPES study.
    Colboc H; Ayoub N; Pegalajar-Jurado A; Schueller R; Armstrong F
    J Wound Care; 2024 Aug; 33(8):542-553. PubMed ID: 39140478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tegagen alginate dressing for moderate to heavily exuding wounds.
    Williams C
    Br J Nurs; 1998 May 14-27; 7(9):550-2. PubMed ID: 9735713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative evaluation of the functional properties of superabsorbent dressings and their effect on exudate management.
    Browning P; White RJ; Rowell T
    J Wound Care; 2016 Aug; 25(8):452-62. PubMed ID: 27523657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hydration response technology dressings for low to excessively exuding wounds: a systematic review.
    Lev-Tov HA; Hermak S
    J Wound Care; 2024 Jun; 33(6):383-392. PubMed ID: 38843010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A prospective, open-label study to assess the clinical performance of a foam dressing in the management of chronic wounds.
    Zoellner P; Kapp H; Smola H
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2006 May; 52(5):34-6, 38, 40-2 passim. PubMed ID: 16687768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of a superabsorbent dressing in a primary care organization.
    Stephen-Haynes J; Stephens C
    Br J Community Nurs; 2012 Mar; Suppl():S36, S38-41. PubMed ID: 22584183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An observational study of a superabsorbent polymer dressing evaluated by clinicians and patients.
    Barrett S; Callaghan R; Chadwick P; Haycocks S; Rippon M; Stephen-Haynes J; Simm S
    J Wound Care; 2018 Feb; 27(2):91-100. PubMed ID: 29424643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical and cost-effectiveness of absorbent dressings in the treatment of highly exuding VLUs.
    Panca M; Cutting K; Guest JF
    J Wound Care; 2013 Mar; 22(3):109-10, 112-8. PubMed ID: 23665729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.