175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28346006)
1. Magnetic resonance imaging susceptibility artifacts in the cervical vertebrae and spinal cord related to monocortical screw-polymethylmethacrylate implants in canine cadavers.
Jones BG; Fosgate GT; Green EM; Habing AM; Hettlich BF
Am J Vet Res; 2017 Apr; 78(4):458-464. PubMed ID: 28346006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical comparison between bicortical pin and monocortical screw/polymethylmethacrylate constructs in the cadaveric canine cervical vertebral column.
Hettlich BF; Allen MJ; Pascetta D; Fosgate GT; Litsky AS
Vet Surg; 2013 Aug; 42(6):693-700. PubMed ID: 23888877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical Comparison of 2 Veterinary Locking Plates to Monocortical Screw/Polymethylmethacrylate Fixation in Canine Cadaveric Cervical Vertebral Column.
Hettlich BF; Fosgate GT; Litsky AS
Vet Surg; 2017 Jan; 46(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 27902850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Magnetic resonance imaging in cadaver dogs with metallic vertebral implants at 3 Tesla: evaluation of the WARP-turbo spin echo sequence.
Griffin JF; Archambault NS; Mankin JM; Wall CR; Thompson JA; Padua A; Purdy D; Kerwin SC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Nov; 38(24):E1548-53. PubMed ID: 23921320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of MR issues for the latest standard brands of orthopedic metal implants: plates and screws.
Zou YF; Chu B; Wang CB; Hu ZY
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Mar; 84(3):450-457. PubMed ID: 25544555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of an intervertebral disk spacer on stiffness after monocortical screw/polymethylmethacrylate fixation in simulated and cadaveric canine cervical vertebral columns.
Hettlich BF; Allen MJ; Glucksman GS; Fosgate GT; Litsky AS
Vet Surg; 2014 Nov; 43(8):988-94. PubMed ID: 24512474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Titanium wire internal fixation for stabilization of injury of the cervical spine: clinical results and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging of the spinal cord.
Geisler FH; Mirvis SE; Zrebeet H; Joslyn JN
Neurosurgery; 1989 Sep; 25(3):356-62. PubMed ID: 2771006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Metallic spinal artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging.
Vaccaro AR; Chesnut RM; Scuderi G; Healy JF; Massie JB; Garfin SR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1994 Jun; 19(11):1237-42. PubMed ID: 8073315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of metal artifact reduction techniques in magnetic resonance imaging of carbon-reinforced PEEK and titanium spinal implants.
Osterhoff G; Huber FA; Graf LC; Erdlen F; Pape HC; Sprengel K; Guggenberger R
Acta Radiol; 2022 Aug; 63(8):1062-1070. PubMed ID: 34229463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Magnetic resonance imaging of titanium anterior cervical spine plating systems.
Tominaga T; Shimizu H; Koshu K; Kayama T; Yoshimoto T
Neurosurgery; 1995 May; 36(5):951-5. PubMed ID: 7791987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Anterior and posterior cervical spine fixation using titanium implants to facilitate magnetic resonance imaging evaluation.
Savolaine ER; Ebraheim NA; Andreshak TG; Jackson WT
J Orthop Trauma; 1989; 3(4):295-9. PubMed ID: 2600696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro biomechanical evaluations of screw-bar-polymethylmethacrylate and pin-polymethylmethacrylate internal fixation implants used to stabilize the vertebral motion unit of the fourth and fifth cervical vertebrae in vertebral column specimens from dogs.
Hicks DG; Pitts MJ; Bagley RS; Vasavada A; Chen AV; Wininger FA; Simon JC
Am J Vet Res; 2009 Jun; 70(6):719-26. PubMed ID: 19496660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A biomechanical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging-compatible wire in cervical spine fixation.
Scuderi GJ; Greenberg SS; Cohen DS; Latta LL; Eismont FJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1993 Oct; 18(14):1991-4. PubMed ID: 8272948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Options for the reduction of magnetic susceptibility artifacts caused by implanted microchips in 0.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging].
Piesnack S; Oechtering G; Ludewig E
Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere; 2015; 43(2):83-92. PubMed ID: 25727725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Magnetic resonance imaging after pedicular screw fixation of the spine.
Ebraheim NA; Savolaine ER; Stitgen SH; Jackson WT
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1992 Jun; (279):133-7. PubMed ID: 1600647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The radiographic and imaging characteristics of porous tantalum implants within the human cervical spine.
Levi AD; Choi WG; Keller PJ; Heiserman JE; Sonntag VK; Dickman CA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Jun; 23(11):1245-50; discussion 1251. PubMed ID: 9636978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of Three Human Cervical Fusion Implants for Use in the Canine Cervical Vertebral Column.
Morrison EJ; Litsky AS; Allen MJ; Fosgate GT; Hettlich BF
Vet Surg; 2016 Oct; 45(7):901-908. PubMed ID: 27598029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inter- and intraobserver reliability of computed tomography in assessment of thoracic pedicle screw placement.
Rao G; Brodke DS; Rondina M; Bacchus K; Dailey AT
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Nov; 28(22):2527-30. PubMed ID: 14624089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Magnetic resonance imaging artifact following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a trabecular metal cage.
Elliott CA; Fox R; Ashforth R; Gourishankar S; Nataraj A
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Mar; 24(3):496-501. PubMed ID: 26613279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Imaging diagnosis-magnetic resonance imaging pulsatility artifact in the canine cervical spine.
Seiler GS; Robertson ID; Mukundan S; Thrall DE
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2011; 52(3):313-6. PubMed ID: 21554480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
