103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28346264)
1. Re: Biases in Randomized Trials: A Conversation Between Trialists and Epidemiologists.
Shinozaki T; Hagiwara Y; Matsuyama Y
Epidemiology; 2017 Jul; 28(4):e40-e41. PubMed ID: 28346264
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Biases in Randomized Trials: A Conversation Between Trialists and Epidemiologists.
Mansournia MA; Higgins JP; Sterne JA; Hernán MA
Epidemiology; 2017 Jan; 28(1):54-59. PubMed ID: 27748683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Erratum for "Biases in Randomized Trials: A Conversation Between Trialists and Epidemiologists.".
Epidemiology; 2018 Sep; 29(5):e49. PubMed ID: 29794512
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Trials and tribulations: cross-learning from the practices of epidemiologists and economists in the evaluation of public health interventions.
Powell-Jackson T; Davey C; Masset E; Krishnaratne S; Hayes R; Hanson K; Hargreaves JR
Health Policy Plan; 2018 Jun; 33(5):702-706. PubMed ID: 29596614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In veterinary trials reporting and communication regarding randomisation procedures is suboptimal.
Di Girolamo N; Giuffrida MA; Winter AL; Meursinge Reynders R
Vet Rec; 2017 Aug; 181(8):195. PubMed ID: 28487452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Are current standards of reporting quality for clinical trials sufficient in addressing important sources of bias?
Mills EJ; Ayers D; Chou R; Thorlund K
Contemp Clin Trials; 2015 Nov; 45(Pt A):2-7. PubMed ID: 26232560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Some main problems eroding the credibility and relevance of randomized trials.
Ioannidis JP
Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2008; 66(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 18537784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Randomised trials in surgery. Employment of academic and evidence based surgeons and epidemiologists may be the answer.
Bridgman S; Maffulli N
BMJ; 2002 Sep; 325(7365):658. PubMed ID: 12269324
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The ethics of neonatal research: A trialists' perspective.
DeMauro SB; Foglia EE; Schmidt B
Semin Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Dec; 20(6):431-5. PubMed ID: 26394826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biases affecting injected doses of an experimental drug during clinical trials.
Perrottet N; Brunner-Ferber F; Grouzmann E; Spertini F; Biollaz J; Buclin T; Widmer N
Trials; 2016 Jul; 17(1):321. PubMed ID: 27423899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Invited commentary: how far can epidemiologists get with statistical adjustment?
Petitti DB; Freedman DA
Am J Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 162(5):415-8; discussion 419-20. PubMed ID: 16014781
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Risk of bias in trial-based economic evaluations: identification of sources and bias-reducing strategies.
Evers SM; Hiligsmann M; Adarkwah CC
Psychol Health; 2015 Jan; 30(1):52-71. PubMed ID: 25141273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Are randomized trials conducted in China or India biased? A comparative empirical analysis.
Zhang D; Freemantle N; Cheng KK
J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Jan; 64(1):90-5. PubMed ID: 20554429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Toward a clarification of the taxonomy of "bias" in epidemiology textbooks.
Schwartz S; Campbell UB; Gatto NM; Gordon K
Epidemiology; 2015 Mar; 26(2):216-22. PubMed ID: 25536455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Expanding the evidence base in transplantation: more and better randomized trials, and extending the value of observational data.
Craig JC; Webster AC; Mitchell A; Irwig L
Transplantation; 2008 Jul; 86(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 18622275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Selection bias results in misinterpretation of randomized controlled trials on arthroscopic treatment of patients with knee osteoarthritis.
Ilahi OA
Arthroscopy; 2010 Feb; 26(2):144-6. PubMed ID: 20141976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Publication bias in trials other than RCTs].
Timmer A
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2011; 105(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 21530909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three challenges described for identifying participants with missing data in trials reports, and potential solutions suggested to systematic reviewers.
Akl EA; Kahale LA; Ebrahim S; Alonso-Coello P; Schünemann HJ; Guyatt GH
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Aug; 76():147-54. PubMed ID: 26944294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Randomised controlled trials may have many unrecognised potential biases.
Hawkes N
BMJ; 2018 Apr; 361():k1561. PubMed ID: 29622530
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Can trial quality be reliably assessed from published reports of cancer trials: evaluation of risk of bias assessments in systematic reviews.
Vale CL; Tierney JF; Burdett S
BMJ; 2013 Apr; 346():f1798. PubMed ID: 23610376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
