98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2834793)
1. [Studies on image quality in mammography using a tungsten anode tube in conjunction with edge filters].
Minski M; Säbel M; Aichinger H; Joite-Barfuss S
Rofo; 1988 Apr; 148(4):437-43. PubMed ID: 2834793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Experimental investigations for dose reduction by optimizing the radiation quality for digital mammography with an a-Se detector].
Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Wenkel E; Böhner C; Lell M; Dassel MS; Bautz WA
Rofo; 2007 May; 179(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 17436182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [A bimetal anode with tungsten or rhodium? Comparative studies on image quality and dosage requirement in mammography].
Funke M; Hermann KP; Breiter N; Moritz J; Müller D; Grabbe E
Rofo; 1995 Nov; 163(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 8527751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimization of tube potential-filter combinations for film-screen mammography: a contrast detail phantom study.
Chida K; Zuguchi M; Sai M; Saito H; Yamada T; Ishibashi T; Ito D; Kimoto N; Kohzuki M; Takahashi S
Clin Imaging; 2005; 29(4):246-50. PubMed ID: 15967314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tungsten anode tubes with K-edge filters for mammography.
Beaman S; Lillicrap SC; Price JL
Br J Radiol; 1983 Oct; 56(670):721-7. PubMed ID: 6616137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Monochromatic x-rays in digital mammography.
Lawaczeck R; Arkadiev V; Diekmann F; Krumrey M
Invest Radiol; 2005 Jan; 40(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 15597018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of anode/filter material and tube potential on contrast, signal-to-noise ratio and average absorbed dose in mammography: a Monte Carlo study.
Dance DR; Thilander AK; Sandborg M; Skinner CL; Castellano IA; Carlsson GA
Br J Radiol; 2000 Oct; 73(874):1056-67. PubMed ID: 11271898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of anode/filter combinations in digital mammography with respect to the average glandular dose.
Uhlenbrock DF; Mertelmeier T
Rofo; 2009 Mar; 181(3):249-54. PubMed ID: 19241602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Image quality in film and xero-mammography. I. Rendering of low contrast values (author's transl)].
Säbel M; Paterok EM; Weishaar J; Willgeroth F
Rofo; 1977 Jun; 126(6):529-36. PubMed ID: 142714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of anode-filter combinations on image quality and radiation dose in 965 women undergoing mammography.
Thilander-Klang AC; Ackerholm PH; Berlin IC; Bjurstam NG; Mattsson SL; Månsson LG; von Schéele C; Thunberg SJ
Radiology; 1997 May; 203(2):348-54. PubMed ID: 9114087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mammography equipment: principles, features, selection.
Feig SA
Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):897-911. PubMed ID: 3306772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Investigations on contrast values in mammography (author's transl)].
Schüle E; Seeger W
Rofo; 1981 Aug; 135(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 6212315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Progress in mammography technics. Bimetal anode tubes and selective filtration technic].
Küchler M; Friedrich M
Rofo; 1993 Jul; 159(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 8334265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mammographic equipment, technique, and quality control.
Friedrich MA
Curr Opin Radiol; 1991 Aug; 3(4):571-8. PubMed ID: 1888654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Film-screen mammography x-ray tube anodes: molybdenum versus tungsten.
Kimme-Smith C; Bassett LW; Gold RH; Rothschild P
Med Phys; 1989; 16(2):279-83. PubMed ID: 2716707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Experimental investigation on the choice of the tungsten/rhodium anode/filter combination for an amorphous selenium-based digital mammography system.
Toroi P; Zanca F; Young KC; van Ongeval C; Marchal G; Bosmans H
Eur Radiol; 2007 Sep; 17(9):2368-75. PubMed ID: 17268798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contrast-to-noise ratio in magnification mammography: a Monte Carlo study.
Koutalonis M; Delis H; Spyrou G; Costaridou L; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3185-99. PubMed ID: 17505097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Image quality in film and xero mammography. Second paper. Reproduction of medium range contrast (author's transl)].
Willgeroth F; Paterok EM; Säbel M; Weishaar J
Rofo; 1980 Apr; 132(4):433-7. PubMed ID: 6450105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intra-individual comparison of average glandular dose of two digital mammography units using different anode/filter combinations.
Engelken FJ; Meyer H; Juran R; Bick U; Fallenberg E; Diekmann F
Acad Radiol; 2009 Oct; 16(10):1272-80. PubMed ID: 19632866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ambient dose equivalent and effective dose from scattered x-ray spectra in mammography for Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh and W/Rh anode/filter combinations.
Künzel R; Herdade SB; Costa PR; Terini RA; Levenhagen RS
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Apr; 51(8):2077-91. PubMed ID: 16585846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
