These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28348594)

  • 1. Randomized Clinical Trial of a Self-Adhering Flowable Composite for Class I Restorations: 2-Year Results.
    Sabbagh J; Dagher S; El Osta N; Souhaid P
    Int J Dent; 2017; 2017():5041529. PubMed ID: 28348594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical Evaluation of a Self-Adhering Flowable Resin Composite in Minimally Invasive Class I Cavities: 5-year Results of a Double Blind Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial.
    Oz FD; Ergin E; Cakir FY; Gurgan S
    Acta Stomatol Croat; 2020 Mar; 54(1):10-21. PubMed ID: 32523153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of rubber dam versus cotton roll isolation on composite resin restorations' survival in primary molars: 2-year results from a non-inferiority clinical trial.
    Olegário IC; Moro BLP; Tedesco TK; Freitas RD; Pássaro AL; Garbim JR; Oliveira R; Mendes FM; ; Raggio DP
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Oct; 22(1):440. PubMed ID: 36217147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of the isolation method on the 10-year clinical behaviour of posterior resin composite restorations.
    Raskin A; Setcos JC; Vreven J; Wilson NH
    Clin Oral Investig; 2000 Sep; 4(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 11000319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical evaluation of a self-adhering flowable composite as occlusal restorative material in primary molars: one-year results.
    Serin BA; Yazicioglu I; Deveci C; Dogan MC
    Eur Oral Res; 2019 Sep; 53(3):119-124. PubMed ID: 31579892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A split-mouth randomized clinical trial of conventional and heavy flowable composites in class II restorations.
    Rocha Gomes Torres C; Rêgo HM; Perote LC; Santos LF; Kamozaki MB; Gutierrez NC; Di Nicoló R; Borges AB
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):793-9. PubMed ID: 24769385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of phosphoric acid etching on microleakage of a self-etch adhesive and a self-adhering composite.
    Rengo C; Goracci C; Juloski J; Chieffi N; Giovannetti A; Vichi A; Ferrari M
    Aust Dent J; 2012 Jun; 57(2):220-6. PubMed ID: 22624765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance of Self-adhering Flowable Composite in Class V Restorations: 18 Months Clinical Study.
    AlHumaid J; Al Harbi FA; ElEmbaby AE
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Jul; 19(7):785-791. PubMed ID: 30066681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An 18-month clinical evaluation of three different universal adhesives used with a universal flowable composite resin in the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions.
    Oz FD; Kutuk ZB; Ozturk C; Soleimani R; Gurgan S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Mar; 23(3):1443-1452. PubMed ID: 30109443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Follow-up of flowable resin composites performed with a universal adhesive system in non-carious cervical lesions: A randomized, controlled 24-month clinical trial.
    Kemaloğlu H; Atalayin Ozkaya C; Ergucu Z; Onal B
    Am J Dent; 2020 Feb; 33(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 32056414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interfacial microscopic examination and chemical analysis of resin-dentin interface of self-adhering flowable resin composite.
    Hamdy TM
    F1000Res; 2017; 6():1688. PubMed ID: 29118975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical evaluation of self-adhering flowable composite versus conventional flowable composite in conservative Class I cavities: Randomized controlled trial.
    Shaalan OO; Abou-Auf E; El Zoghby AF
    J Conserv Dent; 2018; 21(5):485-490. PubMed ID: 30294107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical Evaluation of Flowable Composite Materials in Permanent Molars Small Class I Restorations: 3-Year Double Blind Clinical Study.
    Dukić W; Majić M; Prica N; Oreški I
    Materials (Basel); 2021 Jul; 14(15):. PubMed ID: 34361477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two-year Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial of a Flowable and Conventional Composite in Class I Restorations.
    Lawson NC; Radhakrishnan R; Givan DA; Ramp LC; Burgess JO
    Oper Dent; 2015; 40(6):594-602. PubMed ID: 26237643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-year clinical evaluation of class II posterior composite restorations placed with different techniques and flowable composite linings in endodontically treated teeth.
    Karaman E; Keskin B; Inan U
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Mar; 21(2):709-716. PubMed ID: 27538739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations: A 5-year randomized controlled clinical study.
    van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
    J Dent; 2016 Aug; 51():29-35. PubMed ID: 27238052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A randomized controlled three year evaluation of "bulk-filled" posterior resin restorations based on stress decreasing resin technology.
    van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
    Dent Mater; 2014 Sep; 30(9):e245-51. PubMed ID: 24958689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 5-year clinical performance of resin composite versus resin modified glass ionomer restorative system in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Franco EB; Benetti AR; Ishikiriama SK; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Jorge MF; Navarro MF
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):403-8. PubMed ID: 16924979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A 24-Month Evaluation of Self-Adhering Flowable Composite Compared to Conventional Flowable Composite in Conservative Simple Occlusal Restorations: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Shaalan OO; Abou-Auf E
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2021; 12(4):368-375. PubMed ID: 35068835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.