194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28349182)
1. Biomechanical comparison of anatomical plating systems for comminuted distal humeral fractures.
Varady PA; von Rüden C; Greinwald M; Hungerer S; Pätzold R; Augat P
Int Orthop; 2017 Sep; 41(9):1709-1714. PubMed ID: 28349182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical evaluation of a transcondylar screw from the dorsolateral plate support on the stabilization of orthogonal plate configuration in distal humeral fracture.
Hara A; Kudo T; Ichihara S; Iwase H; Nagao M; Maruyama Y; Kaneko K
Injury; 2019 Feb; 50(2):256-262. PubMed ID: 30579588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical properties of a novel fixation system for intra-articular distal humerus fractures: a finite element analysis.
Kong L; Wang Y; Lu Q; Han Y; Wang F
J Orthop Surg Res; 2021 Nov; 16(1):674. PubMed ID: 34784932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical properties of orthogonal plate configuration versus parallel plate configuration using the same locking plate system for intra-articular distal humeral fractures under radial or ulnar column axial load.
Kudo T; Hara A; Iwase H; Ichihara S; Nagao M; Maruyama Y; Kaneko K
Injury; 2016 Oct; 47(10):2071-2076. PubMed ID: 27578052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical comparison of orthogonal versus parallel double plating systems in intraarticular distal humerus fractures.
Atalar AC; Tunalı O; Erşen A; Kapıcıoğlu M; Sağlam Y; Demirhan MS
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2017 Jan; 51(1):23-28. PubMed ID: 27965047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does posterior configuration have similar strength as parallel configuration for treating comminuted distal humerus fractures? A cadaveric biomechanical study.
Shih CA; Kuan FC; Hsu KL; Hong CK; Lin CL; Yeh ML; Su WR
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 May; 22(1):440. PubMed ID: 33990212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dual plating for fixation of humeral shaft fractures: A mechanical comparison of various combinations of plate lengths.
Karakasli A; Basci O; Ertem F; Sekik E; Havitcioglu H
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2016 Aug; 50(4):432-6. PubMed ID: 27480211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Plate selection for fixation of extra-articular distal humerus fractures: a biomechanical comparison of three different implants.
Scolaro JA; Hsu JE; Svach DJ; Mehta S
Injury; 2014 Dec; 45(12):2040-4. PubMed ID: 25249244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Biomechanical comparative study of three types of osteosynthesis in the treatment of supra and intercondylar fractures of the humerus in adults].
Fornasiéri C; Staub C; Tourné Y; Rumelhart C; Saragaglia D
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1997; 83(3):237-42. PubMed ID: 9255359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ability of modern distal tibia plates to stabilize comminuted pilon fracture fragments: Is dual plate fixation necessary?
Penny P; Swords M; Heisler J; Cien A; Sands A; Cole P
Injury; 2016 Aug; 47(8):1761-9. PubMed ID: 27264277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical comparison of two different periarticular plating systems for stabilization of complex distal humerus fractures.
Schwartz A; Oka R; Odell T; Mahar A
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Nov; 21(9):950-5. PubMed ID: 16782245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical Comparison of Fixed- versus Variable-Angle Locking Screws for Distal Humerus Comminuted Fractures.
Nourbakhsh A; Hirschfeld AG; Dhulipala S; Hutton W; Ganey T; Lozada L; Schlatterer D; Lourie GM
Clin Orthop Surg; 2019 Sep; 11(3):302-308. PubMed ID: 31475051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative stability of perpendicular versus parallel double-locking plating systems in osteoporotic comminuted distal humerus fractures.
Stoffel K; Cunneen S; Morgan R; Nicholls R; Stachowiak G
J Orthop Res; 2008 Jun; 26(6):778-84. PubMed ID: 18203185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Internal fixation of the distal humerus: a comprehensive biomechanical study evaluating current fixation techniques.
Caravaggi P; Laratta JL; Yoon RS; De Biasio J; Ingargiola M; Frank MA; Capo JT; Liporace FA
J Orthop Trauma; 2014 Apr; 28(4):222-6. PubMed ID: 23899767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical comparison of three internal fixation configurations for low transcondylar fractures of the distal humerus.
Zha Y; Hua K; Huan Y; Chen C; Sun W; Ji S; Xiao D; Gong M; Jiang X
Injury; 2023 Feb; 54(2):362-369. PubMed ID: 36509562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative study of three models of extra-articular distal humerus fracture osteosynthesis using the finite element method on an osteoporotic computational model.
Sabalic S; Kodvanj J; Pavic A
Injury; 2013 Sep; 44 Suppl 3():S56-61. PubMed ID: 24060021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is Bridge Plating of Comminuted Humeral Shaft Fractures Advantageous When Using Compression Plates with Three versus Two Screws per Fragment? A Biomechanical Cadaveric Study.
Gomes GS; Zderic I; Ahrend MD; Kojima KE; Varga P; Belangero WD; Richards G; Lambert SM; Gueorguiev B
Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():6649712. PubMed ID: 33748273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Are locking screws advantageous with plate fixation of humeral shaft fractures? A biomechanical analysis of synthetic and cadaveric bone.
O'Toole RV; Andersen RC; Vesnovsky O; Alexander M; Topoleski LD; Nascone JW; Sciadini MF; Turen C; Eglseder WA
J Orthop Trauma; 2008; 22(10):709-15. PubMed ID: 18978547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mechanical comparison in cadaver specimens of three different 90-degree double-plate osteosyntheses for simulated C2-type distal humerus fractures with varying bone densities.
Schuster I; Korner J; Arzdorf M; Schwieger K; Diederichs G; Linke B
J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Feb; 22(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 18349779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Internal fixation of type-C distal femoral fractures in osteoporotic bone: surgical technique.
Mückley T; Wähnert D; Hoffmeier KL; von Oldenburg G; Fröber R; Hofmann GO
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Mar; 93 Suppl 1():40-53. PubMed ID: 21411685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
