184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28349911)
1. Evaluation of Soft Tissue Landmark Reliability between Manual and Computerized Plotting Methods.
Kasinathan G; Kommi PB; Kumar SM; Yashwant A; Arani N; Sabapathy S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Apr; 18(4):317-321. PubMed ID: 28349911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Precision of manual landmark identification between as-received and oriented volume-rendered cone-beam computed tomography images.
Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Balachandran R; Sardana V; Kalra S; Chaurasia S; Sardana HK
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jan; 151(1):118-131. PubMed ID: 28024764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of image enhancement on reliability of landmark identification in digital cephalometry.
Oshagh M; Shahidi SH; Danaei SH
Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 23852241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Effect of Emboss Enhancement on Reliability of Landmark Identification in Digital Lateral Cephalometric Images.
Nikneshan S; Mohseni S; Nouri M; Hadian H; Kharazifard MJ
Iran J Radiol; 2015 Apr; 12(2):e19302. PubMed ID: 26060555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability of landmark identification on monitor-displayed lateral cephalometric images.
Yu SH; Nahm DS; Baek SH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):790.e1-6; discussion e1. PubMed ID: 18538235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms.
Hariharan A; Diwakar NR; Jayanthi K; Hema HM; Deepukrishna S; Ghaste SR
Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 27723632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of soft-tissue profiles in Le Fort I osteotomy patients with Dolphin and Maxilim softwares.
Nadjmi N; Tehranchi A; Azami N; Saedi B; Mollemans W
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):654-62. PubMed ID: 24182581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Personal Computer-Based Cephalometric Landmark Detection With Deep Learning, Using Cephalograms on the Internet.
Nishimoto S; Sotsuka Y; Kawai K; Ishise H; Kakibuchi M
J Craniofac Surg; 2019 Jan; 30(1):91-95. PubMed ID: 30439733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability of landmark identification in cephalometric radiography acquired by a storage phosphor imaging system.
Chen YJ; Chen SK; Huang HW; Yao CC; Chang HF
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):301-6. PubMed ID: 15585806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A knowledge-based algorithm for automatic detection of cephalometric landmarks on CBCT images.
Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Sardana V; Balachandran R; Sardana HK
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2015 Nov; 10(11):1737-52. PubMed ID: 25847662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability of landmark recording on film and digital lateral cephalograms.
Macrì V; Wenzel A
Eur J Orthod; 1993 Apr; 15(2):137-48. PubMed ID: 8500539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reproducibility of linear and angular cephalometric measurements obtained by an artificial-intelligence assisted software (WebCeph) in comparison with digital software (AutoCEPH) and manual tracing method.
Prince STT; Srinivasan D; Duraisamy S; Kannan R; Rajaram K
Dental Press J Orthod; 2023; 28(1):e2321214. PubMed ID: 37018830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of landmark identification on postero-anterior cephalograms.
Sicurezza E; Greco M; Giordano D; Maiorana F; Leonardi R
Prog Orthod; 2012 Sep; 13(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 23021116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography.
Moshiri M; Scarfe WC; Hilgers ML; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):550-60. PubMed ID: 17920510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of fully automated cephalometric measurements obtained from web-based artificial intelligence driven platform.
Mahto RK; Kafle D; Giri A; Luintel S; Karki A
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Apr; 22(1):132. PubMed ID: 35440037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Digital and manual cephalometric analysis.
Thurzo A; Javorka V; Stanko P; Lysy J; Suchancova B; Lehotska V; Valkovic L; Makovnik M
Bratisl Lek Listy; 2010; 111(2):97-100. PubMed ID: 20429323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of scanned lateral cephalograms with corresponding original radiographs.
Bruntz LQ; Palomo JM; Baden S; Hans MG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Sep; 130(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 16979492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A new craniofacial diagnostic technique: the Sydney diagnostic system.
Moate SJ; Geenty JP; Shen G; Darendeliler MA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Mar; 131(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 17346588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Landmark identification errors on cone-beam computed tomography-derived cephalograms and conventional digital cephalograms.
Chang ZC; Hu FC; Lai E; Yao CC; Chen MH; Chen YJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Dec; 140(6):e289-97. PubMed ID: 22133963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A study on the reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks when undertaking a three-dimensional (3D) cephalometric analysis.
Zamora N; Llamas JM; Cibrián R; Gandia JL; Paredes V
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2012 Jul; 17(4):e678-88. PubMed ID: 22322503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
