598 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28350876)
1. MIPE: A metagenome-based community structure explorer and SSU primer evaluation tool.
Zou B; Li J; Zhou Q; Quan ZX
PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0174609. PubMed ID: 28350876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microbial Community Analysis with Ribosomal Gene Fragments from Shotgun Metagenomes.
Guo J; Cole JR; Zhang Q; Brown CT; Tiedje JM
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2016 Jan; 82(1):157-66. PubMed ID: 26475107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. RiboTagger: fast and unbiased 16S/18S profiling using whole community shotgun metagenomic or metatranscriptome surveys.
Xie C; Goi CL; Huson DH; Little PF; Williams RB
BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Dec; 17(Suppl 19):508. PubMed ID: 28155666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Megraft: a software package to graft ribosomal small subunit (16S/18S) fragments onto full-length sequences for accurate species richness and sequencing depth analysis in pyrosequencing-length metagenomes and similar environmental datasets.
Bengtsson J; Hartmann M; Unterseher M; Vaishampayan P; Abarenkov K; Durso L; Bik EM; Garey JR; Eriksson KM; Nilsson RH
Res Microbiol; 2012 Jul; 163(6-7):407-12. PubMed ID: 22824070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MetCap: a bioinformatics probe design pipeline for large-scale targeted metagenomics.
Kushwaha SK; Manoharan L; Meerupati T; Hedlund K; Ahrén D
BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Feb; 16(1):65. PubMed ID: 25880302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ultrafast and accurate 16S rRNA microbial community analysis using Kraken 2.
Lu J; Salzberg SL
Microbiome; 2020 Aug; 8(1):124. PubMed ID: 32859275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tax4Fun: predicting functional profiles from metagenomic 16S rRNA data.
Aßhauer KP; Wemheuer B; Daniel R; Meinicke P
Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 31(17):2882-4. PubMed ID: 25957349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modified RNA-seq method for microbial community and diversity analysis using rRNA in different types of environmental samples.
Yan YW; Zou B; Zhu T; Hozzein WN; Quan ZX
PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0186161. PubMed ID: 29016661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bioinformatics for NGS-based metagenomics and the application to biogas research.
Jünemann S; Kleinbölting N; Jaenicke S; Henke C; Hassa J; Nelkner J; Stolze Y; Albaum SP; Schlüter A; Goesmann A; Sczyrba A; Stoye J
J Biotechnol; 2017 Nov; 261():10-23. PubMed ID: 28823476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assembling full-length rRNA genes from short-read metagenomic sequence datasets using EMIRGE.
Miller CS
Methods Enzymol; 2013; 531():333-52. PubMed ID: 24060129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating and Improving Small Subunit rRNA PCR Primer Coverage for Bacteria, Archaea, and Eukaryotes Using Metagenomes from Global Ocean Surveys.
McNichol J; Berube PM; Biller SJ; Fuhrman JA
mSystems; 2021 Jun; 6(3):e0056521. PubMed ID: 34060911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comprehensive evaluation of the sl1p pipeline for 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis.
Whelan FJ; Surette MG
Microbiome; 2017 Aug; 5(1):100. PubMed ID: 28807046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. COGNIZER: A Framework for Functional Annotation of Metagenomic Datasets.
Bose T; Haque MM; Reddy C; Mande SS
PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0142102. PubMed ID: 26561344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Functional dynamics of bacterial species in the mouse gut microbiome revealed by metagenomic and metatranscriptomic analyses.
Chung YW; Gwak HJ; Moon S; Rho M; Ryu JH
PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227886. PubMed ID: 31978162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Inference-based accuracy of metagenome prediction tools varies across sample types and functional categories.
Sun S; Jones RB; Fodor AA
Microbiome; 2020 Apr; 8(1):46. PubMed ID: 32241293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characterising the Canine Oral Microbiome by Direct Sequencing of Reverse-Transcribed rRNA Molecules.
McDonald JE; Larsen N; Pennington A; Connolly J; Wallis C; Rooks DJ; Hall N; McCarthy AJ; Allison HE
PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0157046. PubMed ID: 27276347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of library preparation protocols and template quantity on the metagenomic reconstruction of a mock microbial community.
Bowers RM; Clum A; Tice H; Lim J; Singh K; Ciobanu D; Ngan CY; Cheng JF; Tringe SG; Woyke T
BMC Genomics; 2015 Oct; 16():856. PubMed ID: 26496746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Re-purposing software for functional characterization of the microbiome.
Gardiner LJ; Haiminen N; Utro F; Parida L; Seabolt E; Krishna R; Kaufman JH
Microbiome; 2021 Jan; 9(1):4. PubMed ID: 33422152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Practical considerations for sampling and data analysis in contemporary metagenomics-based environmental studies.
Staley C; Sadowsky MJ
J Microbiol Methods; 2018 Nov; 154():14-18. PubMed ID: 30287354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microbial community analysis using high-throughput sequencing technology: a beginner's guide for microbiologists.
Jo J; Oh J; Park C
J Microbiol; 2020 Mar; 58(3):176-192. PubMed ID: 32108314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
