110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28351185)
1. Biomechanical evaluation of spring system for implant-supported prosthesis: analysis by photoelasticity and extensometry.
Goiato MC; de Medeiros RA; da Silva EV; Sônego MV; Dos Santos DM
J Med Eng Technol; 2017 May; 41(4):309-313. PubMed ID: 28351185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stress distribution in implant-supported prostheses using different connection systems and cantilever lengths: digital photoelasticity.
Goiato MC; Shibayama R; Gennari Filho H; de Medeiros RA; Pesqueira AA; dos Santos DM; de Araújo CA
J Med Eng Technol; 2016; 40(2):35-42. PubMed ID: 26783652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stress distribution of different implant connections associated with multiple implant-supported prostheses.
Goiato MC; Sarauza Arsufi G; de Medeiros RA; Pesqueira AA; da Silva EVF; Sonego MV; Dos Santos DM
J Med Eng Technol; 2018 Jul; 42(5):359-367. PubMed ID: 30251571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Photoelastic analysis of cemented or screwed implant-supported prostheses with different prosthetic connections.
Tonella BP; Pellizzer EP; Ferraço R; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Carvalho PS; Goiato MC
J Oral Implantol; 2011 Aug; 37(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 21851260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stress distribution on short implants with different designs: a photoelastic analysis.
Goiato MC; de Medeiros RA; Sônego MV; de Lima TM; Pesqueira AA; Dos Santos DM
J Med Eng Technol; 2017 Feb; 41(2):115-121. PubMed ID: 27696920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Photoelastic Analysis on Different Retention Methods of Implant-Supported Prosthesis.
Pimentel AC; Manzi MR; Polo CI; Sendyk CL; da Graça Naclério-Homem M; Sendyk WR
J Oral Implantol; 2015 Jun; 41(3):258-63. PubMed ID: 25198152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Photoelastic analysis of biomechanical behavior of single and multiple fixed partial prostheses with different prosthetic connections.
Tonella BP; Pellizzer EP; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Ferraço R; de Faria Almeida DA
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2060-3. PubMed ID: 22067856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stress distribution in bone simulation model with pre-angled implants.
Goiato MC; Arsufi GS; de Medeiros RA; Pesqueira AA; Guiotti AM; dos Santos DM
J Med Eng Technol; 2015; 39(6):322-7. PubMed ID: 26100976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Photoelastic stress analysis in screwed and cemented implant-supported dentures with external hexagon implants.
Pellizzer EP; Tonella BP; Ferraço R; Falcón-Antenucci RM; de Carvalho PS; Alves-Rezende MC
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 21(4):1110-3. PubMed ID: 20613577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Photoelastic analysis of stress distribution with different implant systems.
Pellizzer EP; Carli RI; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Verri FR; Goiato MC; Villa LM
J Oral Implantol; 2014 Apr; 40(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 22208909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the correlation of photoelasticity and digital imaging to characterize the load transfer of implant-supported restorations.
Tiossi R; de Torres EM; Rodrigues RC; Conrad HJ; de Mattos Mda G; Fok AS; Ribeiro RF
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):276-84. PubMed ID: 24461947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stress distribution of multiple implant-supported prostheses: Photoelastic and strain gauge analyses of external hexagon and morse taper connections.
Bittencourt AB; Rezende EO; Campaner M; Bitencourt SB; Dos Santos DM; Pesqueira AA; Goiato MC
J Clin Exp Dent; 2022 Mar; 14(3):e235-e240. PubMed ID: 35317292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of crown-to-implant ratio on stress around single short-wide implants: a photoelastic stress analysis.
Sotto-Maior BS; Senna PM; da Silva-Neto JP; de Arruda Nóbilo MA; Del Bel Cury AA
J Prosthodont; 2015 Jan; 24(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 24919655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stress distribution in implant-supported prosthesis with external and internal implant-abutment connections.
Coelho Goiato M; Pesqueira AA; Falcón-Antenucci RM; Dos Santos DM; Haddad MF; Bannwart LC; Moreno A
Acta Odontol Scand; 2013 Mar; 71(2):283-8. PubMed ID: 22486241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical comparison of axial and tilted implants for mandibular full-arch fixed prostheses.
Kim KS; Kim YL; Bae JM; Cho HW
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):976-84. PubMed ID: 22010079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of stress analysis methods to evaluate the biomechanics of oral rehabilitation with implants.
Pesqueira AA; Goiato MC; Filho HG; Monteiro DR; Santos DM; Haddad MF; Pellizzer EP
J Oral Implantol; 2014 Apr; 40(2):217-28. PubMed ID: 24779954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A photoelastic stress analysis of screw- and cement-retained implant prostheses with marginal gaps.
Lee JI; Lee Y; Kim NY; Kim YL; Cho HW
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Oct; 15(5):735-49. PubMed ID: 23927066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stress patterns around distal angled implants in the all-on-four concept configuration.
Begg T; Geerts GA; Gryzagoridis J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):663-71. PubMed ID: 19885406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of implant framework and mandibular flexure on the strain distribution on a Kennedy class II mandible restored with a long-span implant fixed restoration: a pilot study.
Law C; Bennani V; Lyons K; Swain M
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jul; 112(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 24388719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of the number of supporting implants on mandibular photoelastic models with different implant-retained overdenture designs.
Celik G; Uludag B
J Prosthodont; 2014 Jul; 23(5):374-80. PubMed ID: 24417330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
