These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28351185)

  • 61. A photoelastic and strain gauge analysis of angled abutments for an implant system.
    Clelland NL; Gilat A; McGlumphy EA; Brantley WA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1993; 8(5):541-8. PubMed ID: 8112794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. The staggered installation of dental implants and its effect on bone stresses.
    Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; Jagger DC; Hammerle CH
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):121-7. PubMed ID: 17716255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Effect of Framework in an Implant-Supported Full-Arch Fixed Prosthesis: 3D Finite Element Analysis.
    Menini M; Pesce P; Bevilacqua M; Pera F; Tealdo T; Barberis F; Pera P
    Int J Prosthodont; 2015; 28(6):627-30. PubMed ID: 26523725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Macro design effects on stress distribution around implants: a photoelastic stress analysis.
    Ozkir SE; Terzioglu H
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(5):603-7. PubMed ID: 23422604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. External hexagon and internal hexagon in straight and offset implant placement: strain gauge analysis.
    Nishioka RS; de Vasconcellos LG; de Melo Nishioka LN
    Implant Dent; 2009 Dec; 18(6):512-20. PubMed ID: 20009605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Influence of implant-retained silicone oculo-palpebral prosthesis on stress distribution: a pilot study using a photoelastic model.
    Cortizo DL; Kodama RM; Oliveira JA; Mesquita AM; Laganá DC; Dib LL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(6):1303-9. PubMed ID: 26574856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Implant-bone load transfer mechanisms in complete-arch prostheses supported by four implants: a three-dimensional finite element approach.
    Baggi L; Pastore S; Di Girolamo M; Vairo G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Jan; 109(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 23328192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Influence of implant/abutment connection on stress distribution to implant-surrounding bone: a finite element analysis.
    Hanaoka M; Gehrke SA; Mardegan F; Gennari CR; Taschieri S; Del Fabbro M; Corbella S
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Oct; 23(7):565-71. PubMed ID: 24750397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Reflection photoelasticity: a new method for studies of clinical mechanics in prosthetic dentistry.
    Fernandes CP; Glantz PO; Svensson SA; Bergmark A
    Dent Mater; 2003 Mar; 19(2):106-17. PubMed ID: 12543116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Stress distribution in fixed mandibular prostheses fabricated by CAD/CAM and conventional techniques: Photoelastic and strain gauge analyses.
    de Medeiros RA; Dos Santos DM; Pesqueira AA; Campaner M; Bitencourt SB; da Silva EV; Goiato MC
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2019 Sep; 11(9):e807-e813. PubMed ID: 31636873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. [Photoelastic models applied to dental restorations].
    Marín-Miranda M; Juárez-López ML; Espinosa-Bautista A
    Rev Cient Odontol (Lima); 2021; 9(4):e084. PubMed ID: 38463724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Photoelasticity for Stress Concentration Analysis in Dentistry and Medicine.
    Marín-Miranda M; Wintergerst AM; Moreno-Vargas YA; Juárez-López MLA; Tavera-Ruiz C
    Materials (Basel); 2022 Sep; 15(19):. PubMed ID: 36234159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. A Direct Approach to In-Plane Stress Separation using Photoelastic Ptychography.
    Anthony N; Cadenazzi G; Kirkwood H; Huwald E; Nugent K; Abbey B
    Sci Rep; 2016 Aug; 6():30541. PubMed ID: 27488605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Characterization of the photoelastic dispersion coefficient using polarized digital holography.
    Leal da Silva S; Prado FM; Toffoli DJ; Wetter NU
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2023 Apr; 40(4):C108-C114. PubMed ID: 37132980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. An in-situ fluorescence-based optical extensometry system for imaging mechanically loaded bone.
    Price C; Li W; Novotny JE; Wang L
    J Orthop Res; 2010 Jun; 28(6):805-11. PubMed ID: 20041487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Photoelastic characterization of shear-bands in mechanically stretched polymeric fibers.
    Sokkar TZN; El-Bakary MA; Azam AAS; Hamza AA
    Microsc Res Tech; 2022 Jan; 85(1):193-201. PubMed ID: 34369630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Integrated photoelasticity through imaging fourier polarimetry of an elliptic retarder.
    Berezhna S; Berezhnyy I; Takashi M
    Appl Opt; 2001 Feb; 40(5):644-51. PubMed ID: 18357041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Principal formulas of integrated photoelasticity in terms of characteristic parameters.
    Ainola L; Aben H
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2005 Jun; 22(6):1181-6. PubMed ID: 15984493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Digital holographic photoelasticity.
    Narayanamurthy CS; Pedrini G; Osten W
    Appl Opt; 2017 May; 56(13):F213-F217. PubMed ID: 28463266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. On the optical theory of photoelastic tomography.
    Ainola L; Aben H
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2004 Jun; 21(6):1093-101. PubMed ID: 15191193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.