189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28352147)
1. Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy for Uteri Greater Than One Kilogram.
Ito TE; Vargas MV; Moawad GN; Opoku-Anane J; Shu MK; Marfori CQ; Robinson JK
JSLS; 2017; 21(1):. PubMed ID: 28352147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.
Bretschneider CE; Frazzini Padilla P; Das D; Jelovsek JE; Unger CA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):490.e1-490.e8. PubMed ID: 30222939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Feasibility and safety of total laparoscopic hysterectomy for uteri weighing from 1.5 kg to 11.000 kg.
Macciò A; Chiappe G; Kotsonis P; Lavra F; Sanna E; Collu I; Nemolato S; Madeddu C
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Jan; 303(1):169-179. PubMed ID: 32949285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laparoscopic Versus Open Hysterectomy for Benign Disease in Uteri Weighing >1 kg: A Retrospective Analysis on 258 Patients.
Uccella S; Morosi C; Marconi N; Arrigo A; Gisone B; Casarin J; Pinelli C; Borghi C; Ghezzi F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):62-69. PubMed ID: 28711761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.
Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotically assisted hysterectomy in patients with large uteri: outcomes in five community practices.
Payne TN; Dauterive FR; Pitter MC; Giep HN; Giep BN; Grogg TW; Shanbour KA; Goff DW; Hubert HB
Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Mar; 115(3):535-542. PubMed ID: 20177284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laparoscopic hysterectomy in case of uteri weighing ≥1 kilogram: a series of 71 cases and review of the literature.
Uccella S; Cromi A; Serati M; Casarin J; Sturla D; Ghezzi F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(3):460-5. PubMed ID: 24012921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic versus abdominal hysterectomy for very large uteri.
Silasi DA; Gallo T; Silasi M; Menderes G; Azodi M
JSLS; 2013; 17(3):400-6. PubMed ID: 24018076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Safety and feasibility of the three-port robot-assisted hysterectomy across uterine weights.
Tyan P; Klebanoff JS; Frangieh M; North A; Smith S; Amdur R; Kazma J; Moawad GN
J Robot Surg; 2021 Apr; 15(2):259-264. PubMed ID: 32557096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Uterine weight and complications after abdominal, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomy.
Louie M; Strassle PD; Moulder JK; Dizon AM; Schiff LD; Carey ET
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):480.e1-480.e8. PubMed ID: 29959931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of complications, conversion rate, malignancy rate, and, surgeon's experience in laparoscopic assisted supracervical hysterectomy (LASH) of 1274 large uteri: A retrospective study.
Tchartchian G; Bojahr B; Krentel H; De Wilde RL
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Dec; 101(12):1450-1457. PubMed ID: 36203317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficacy and safety of robotic-assisted surgery in challenging hysterectomies - a single institutional experience.
Perutelli A; Domenici L; Garibaldi S; Albanesi G; Baroni C; Salvati L; Salvati N; Cecchi E; Bottone P; Salerno MG
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2022 Feb; 26(4):1235-1240. PubMed ID: 35253179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Association Between Body Mass Index, Uterine Size, and Operative Morbidity in Women Undergoing Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy.
Shah DK; Van Voorhis BJ; Vitonis AF; Missmer SA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(7):1113-1122. PubMed ID: 27523922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of 2 minimally invasive routes for hysterectomy of large uteri.
Smorgick N; Dalton VK; Patzkowsky KE; Hoffman MR; Advincula AP; As-Sanie S
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2013 Aug; 122(2):128-31. PubMed ID: 23664102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Laparoscopic hysterectomy in large uteri: Experience from a tertiary care hospital in Bangladesh.
Jahan S; Jahan A; Joarder M; Habib SH; Sharmin F; Nayer R
Asian J Endosc Surg; 2015 Aug; 8(3):323-7. PubMed ID: 25809981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique.
Scheib SA; Fader AN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):179.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25088863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoscopic Versus Open Hysterectomy for Benign Disease in Women with Giant Uteri (≥1500 g): Feasibility and Outcomes.
Uccella S; Casarin J; Marconi N; Cromi A; Morosi C; Gisone B; Pinelli C; Ghezzi F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):922-7. PubMed ID: 27223048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predictors of Overnight Admission after Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy in the Expert Setting.
Moawad G; Tyan P; Vargas V; Park D; Young H; Marfori C
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019 Jan; 26(1):122-128. PubMed ID: 29723642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimally invasive hysterectomy at a university teaching hospital.
Mitri M; Fanning J; Davies M; Kesterson J; Ural S; Kunselman A; Harkins G
JSLS; 2014; 18(3):. PubMed ID: 25392620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of cost and operative outcomes of robotic hysterectomy compared to laparoscopic hysterectomy across different uterine weights.
Moawad GN; Abi Khalil ED; Tyan P; Shu MK; Samuel D; Amdur R; Scheib SA; Marfori CQ
J Robot Surg; 2017 Dec; 11(4):433-439. PubMed ID: 28144809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
