210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28355138)
21. Pressure ulcers in the intensive care unit: the relationship between nursing workload, illness severity and pressure ulcer risk.
Cremasco MF; Wenzel F; Zanei SS; Whitaker IY
J Clin Nurs; 2013 Aug; 22(15-16):2183-91. PubMed ID: 23216694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Predictive Validity of the Braden Scale for Pressure Ulcer Risk in Critical Care: A Meta-Analysis.
Wei M; Wu L; Chen Y; Fu Q; Chen W; Yang D
Nurs Crit Care; 2020 May; 25(3):165-170. PubMed ID: 31985893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. An Observational, Prospective Cohort Pilot Study to Compare the Use of Subepidermal Moisture Measurements Versus Ultrasound and Visual Skin Assessments for Early Detection of Pressure Injury.
Gefen A; Gershon S
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2018 Sep; 64(9):12-27. PubMed ID: 30256748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Predictive validity of the Braden scale for assessing risk of developing pressure ulcers and dependence-related lesions.
Roca-Biosca A; Rubio-Rico L; Fernández MIM; Grau NG; Garijo GT; Fernández FPG
J Wound Care; 2017 Sep; 26(9):528-536. PubMed ID: 28880761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. All at-risk patients are not created equal: analysis of Braden pressure ulcer risk scores to identify specific risks.
Tescher AN; Branda ME; Byrne TJ; Naessens JM
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2012; 39(3):282-91. PubMed ID: 22552104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Automated Pressure Injury Risk Assessment System Incorporated Into an Electronic Health Record System.
Jin Y; Jin T; Lee SM
Nurs Res; 2017; 66(6):462-472. PubMed ID: 29095377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Predictive validity of the Braden scale for pressure ulcer risk in critical care patients.
Serpa LF; Santos VL; Campanili TC; Queiroz M
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem; 2011; 19(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 21412629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Subepidermal moisture predicts erythema and stage 1 pressure ulcers in nursing home residents: a pilot study.
Bates-Jensen BM; McCreath HE; Kono A; Apeles NC; Alessi C
J Am Geriatr Soc; 2007 Aug; 55(8):1199-205. PubMed ID: 17661958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A prospective, descriptive study of risk factors related to pressure ulcer development among patients in intensive care units.
Ülker Efteli E; Yapucu Günes Ü
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2013 Jul; 59(7):22-7. PubMed ID: 23846003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Benchmarking to the international pressure ulcer prevalence survey.
House S; Giles T; Whitcomb J
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2011; 38(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 21483271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The association of BMI and Braden total score on the occurrence of pressure ulcers.
Drake DJ; Swanson M; Baker G; Pokorny M; Rose MA; Clark-Reed L; Waters W; Watkins FR; Engelke MK
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2010; 37(4):367-71. PubMed ID: 20644369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Assessing predictive validity of the modified Braden scale for prediction of pressure ulcer risk of orthopaedic patients in an acute care setting.
Chan WS; Pang SM; Kwong EW
J Clin Nurs; 2009 Jun; 18(11):1565-73. PubMed ID: 19490294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Pilot study compares scores of the Resident Assessment Instrument Minimum Data Set Version 2.0 (MDS 2.0) Pressure Ulcer Risk Scale with the Braden Pressure Ulcer Risk assessment for patients in complex continuing care.
Carreau L; Niezgoda H; Trainor A; Parent M; Woodbury MG
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2015 Jan; 28(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 25502973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A comparative, descriptive study of systemic factors and survival in elderly patients with sacral pressure ulcers.
Jaul E; Menczel J
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2015 Mar; 61(3):20-6. PubMed ID: 25751847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A prospective, longitudinal study to assess use of continuous and reactive low-pressure mattresses to reduce pressure ulcer incidence in a pediatric intensive care unit.
García-Molina P; Balaguer-López E; Torra I Bou JE; Alvarez-Ordiales A; Quesada-Ramos C; Verdú-Soriano J
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2012 Jul; 58(7):32-9. PubMed ID: 22798352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Exploring the role of pain as an early predictor of category 2 pressure ulcers: a prospective cohort study.
Smith IL; Brown S; McGinnis E; Briggs M; Coleman S; Dealey C; Muir D; Nelson EA; Stevenson R; Stubbs N; Wilson L; Brown JM; Nixon J
BMJ Open; 2017 Jan; 7(1):e013623. PubMed ID: 28110286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A Meta-analysis to Evaluate the Predictive Validity of the Braden Scale for Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment in Long-term Care.
Chen HL; Shen WQ; Liu P
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2016 Sep; 62(9):20-8. PubMed ID: 27668477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Use of high-frequency ultrasound to detect heel pressure injury in elders.
Helvig EI; Nichols LW
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2012; 39(5):500-8. PubMed ID: 22864192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluating the validity of the Braden scale using longitudinal electronic medical records.
Jin Y; Piao J; Lee SM
Res Nurs Health; 2015 Apr; 38(2):152-61. PubMed ID: 25556557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison Study of Braden Scale and Time-to-Erythema Measures in Long-term Care.
Yap TL; Rapp MP; Kennerly S; Cron SG; Bergstrom N
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2015; 42(5):461-7. PubMed ID: 26336042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
