These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2835574)

  • 1. Evolutionary change of restriction cleavage sites and phylogenetic inference for man and apes.
    Nei M; Tajima F
    Mol Biol Evol; 1985 May; 2(3):189-205. PubMed ID: 2835574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evolutionary change of restriction cleavage sites and phylogenetic inference.
    Li WH
    Genetics; 1986 May; 113(1):187-213. PubMed ID: 3011589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A simulation study on Nei and Li's model for estimating DNA divergence from restriction enzyme maps.
    Li WH
    J Mol Evol; 1981; 17(4):251-5. PubMed ID: 6267313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evolutionary tree for apes and humans based on cleavage maps of mitochondrial DNA.
    Ferris SD; Wilson AC; Brown WM
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1981 Apr; 78(4):2432-6. PubMed ID: 6264476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relative efficiencies of the maximum parsimony and distance-matrix methods in obtaining the correct phylogenetic tree.
    Sourdis J; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1988 May; 5(3):298-311. PubMed ID: 3386530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evolutionary distances between nucleotide sequences based on the distribution of substitution rates among sites as estimated by parsimony.
    Tourasse NJ; Gouy M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1997 Mar; 14(3):287-98. PubMed ID: 9066796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Boolean analysis and standard phylogenetic methods using artificially evolved and natural mt-tRNA sequences from great apes.
    Ari E; Ittzés P; Podani J; Thi QC; Jakó E
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2012 Apr; 63(1):193-202. PubMed ID: 22289866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relative efficiencies of the maximum-parsimony and distance-matrix methods of phylogeny construction for restriction data.
    Lin J; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1991 May; 8(3):356-65. PubMed ID: 1677154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Theoretical foundation of the minimum-evolution method of phylogenetic inference.
    Rzhetsky A; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1993 Sep; 10(5):1073-95. PubMed ID: 8412650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Methods for computing the standard errors of branching points in an evolutionary tree and their application to molecular data from humans and apes.
    Nei M; Stephens JC; Saitou N
    Mol Biol Evol; 1985 Jan; 2(1):66-85. PubMed ID: 2897060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An improved method for estimating sequence divergence between related DNAs from changes in restriction endonuclease cleavage sites.
    Gotoh O; Hayashi JI; Yonekawa H; Tagashira Y
    J Mol Evol; 1979 Dec; 14(4):301-10. PubMed ID: 231686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of the small ribosomal RNA genes from the mitochondrial DNA of the great apes and humans: sequence, structure, evolution, and phylogenetic implications.
    Hixson JE; Brown WM
    Mol Biol Evol; 1986 Jan; 3(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 3444394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. I. Distantly related species.
    Tateno Y; Nei M; Tajima F
    J Mol Evol; 1982; 18(6):387-404. PubMed ID: 7175956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inference of gain and loss events from phyletic patterns using stochastic mapping and maximum parsimony--a simulation study.
    Cohen O; Pupko T
    Genome Biol Evol; 2011; 3():1265-75. PubMed ID: 21971516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the best evolutionary rate for phylogenetic analysis.
    Yang Z
    Syst Biol; 1998 Mar; 47(1):125-33. PubMed ID: 12064232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tests of applicability of several substitution models for DNA sequence data.
    Rzhetsky A; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1995 Jan; 12(1):131-51. PubMed ID: 7877488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF CHLOROPLAST DNA RESTRICTION SITE DATA AT HIGHER TAXONOMIC LEVELS: AN EXAMPLE FROM THE ASTERACEAE.
    Jansen RK; Holsinger KE; Michaels HJ; Palmer JD
    Evolution; 1990 Dec; 44(8):2089-2105. PubMed ID: 28564424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A rate-independent technique for analysis of nucleic acid sequences: evolutionary parsimony.
    Lake JA
    Mol Biol Evol; 1987 Mar; 4(2):167-91. PubMed ID: 3447007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Resolving deep phylogenetic relationships in salamanders: analyses of mitochondrial and nuclear genomic data.
    Weisrock DW; Harmon LJ; Larson A
    Syst Biol; 2005 Oct; 54(5):758-77. PubMed ID: 16243763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimum description principle applied to construction of molecular phylogenetic tree.
    Ren FR; Tanaka H; Fukuda N; Gojobori T
    Medinfo; 1995; 8 Pt 2():899-903. PubMed ID: 8591579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.