These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28355929)

  • 1. Teasing Apart Overclaiming, Overconfidence, and Socially Desirable Responding.
    Bensch D; Paulhus DL; Stankov L; Ziegler M
    Assessment; 2019 Apr; 26(3):351-363. PubMed ID: 28355929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The nature of faking: A homogeneous and predictable construct?
    Bensch D; Maaß U; Greiff S; Horstmann KT; Ziegler M
    Psychol Assess; 2019 Apr; 31(4):532-544. PubMed ID: 30869958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Controlling for Response Bias in Self-Ratings of Personality: A Comparison of Impression Management Scales and the Overclaiming Technique.
    Müller S; Moshagen M
    J Pers Assess; 2019; 101(3):229-236. PubMed ID: 29648894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Liar! Liar! (when stakes are higher): Understanding how the overclaiming technique can be used to measure faking in personnel selection.
    Dunlop PD; Bourdage JS; de Vries RE; McNeill IM; Jorritsma K; Orchard M; Austen T; Baines T; Choe WK
    J Appl Psychol; 2020 Aug; 105(8):784-799. PubMed ID: 31714104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism: a nomological network analysis.
    Miller JD; Hoffman BJ; Gaughan ET; Gentile B; Maples J; Keith Campbell W
    J Pers; 2011 Oct; 79(5):1013-42. PubMed ID: 21204843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Openness to (reporting) experiences that one never had: Overclaiming as an outcome of the knowledge accumulated through a proclivity for cognitive and aesthetic exploration.
    Dunlop PD; Bourdage JS; de Vries RE; Hilbig BE; Zettler I; Ludeke SG
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2017 Nov; 113(5):810-834. PubMed ID: 27454925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The desirability bias in personality-related syllogistic reasoning.
    Hadžiahmetović N; Opačić G; Teovanović P; Kolenović-Đapo J
    Scand J Psychol; 2024 Jun; 65(3):394-402. PubMed ID: 38041434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Social Desirability in Spouse Ratings.
    Vésteinsdóttir V; Steingrimsdottir ED; Joinson A; Reips UD; Thorsdottir F
    Psychol Rep; 2019 Apr; 122(2):593-608. PubMed ID: 29648502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Overclaiming is not related to dark triad personality traits or stated and revealed risk preferences.
    Keller L; Bieleke M; Koppe KM; Gollwitzer PM
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(8):e0255207. PubMed ID: 34339425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does the Over-Claiming Questionnaire measure overclaiming? Absent convergent validity in a large community sample.
    Ludeke SG; Makransky G
    Psychol Assess; 2016 Jun; 28(6):765-74. PubMed ID: 26372263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Socially desirable responding and its elusive effects on the validity of personality assessments.
    Paunonen SV; LeBel EP
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 Jul; 103(1):158-75. PubMed ID: 22564012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Socially desirable responding in Chinese university students: denial and enhancement?
    Li F; Li Y; Wang Y
    Psychol Rep; 2015 Apr; 116(2):409-21. PubMed ID: 25730746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Expanding the Nomological Net of the Pathological Narcissism Inventory: German Validation and Extension in a Clinical Inpatient Sample.
    Morf CC; Schürch E; Küfner A; Siegrist P; Vater A; Back M; Mestel R; Schröder-Abé M
    Assessment; 2017 Jun; 24(4):419-443. PubMed ID: 26874362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What if we fake emotional intelligence? A test of criterion validity attenuation.
    Choi S; Kluemper DH; Sauley KS
    J Pers Assess; 2011 May; 93(3):270-7. PubMed ID: 21516586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of Social Desirability and Common Method Variance on Two Measures of Entitlement.
    Miller BK
    Psychol Rep; 2021 Aug; 124(4):1845-1862. PubMed ID: 32615868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are malignant self-regard and vulnerable narcissism different constructs?
    Huprich SK; Nelson S; Sohnleitner A; Lengu K; Shankar S; Rexer K
    J Clin Psychol; 2018 Sep; 74(9):1556-1569. PubMed ID: 29508943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adolescent Narcissism, Aggression, and Prosocial Behavior: The Relevance of Socially Desirable Responding.
    Barry CT; Lui JH; Anderson AC
    J Pers Assess; 2017; 99(1):46-55. PubMed ID: 27362301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Social desirability in personality inventories: symptoms, diagnosis and prescribed cure.
    Bäckström M; Björklund F
    Scand J Psychol; 2013 Apr; 54(2):152-9. PubMed ID: 23252410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Social desirability scales as indicators of self-enhancement and impression management.
    Parmač Kovačić M; Galić Z; Jerneić Ž
    J Pers Assess; 2014; 96(5):532-43. PubMed ID: 24837586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Socially Desirable Responding in Web-Based Questionnaires: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Candor Hypothesis.
    Gnambs T; Kaspar K
    Assessment; 2017 Sep; 24(6):746-762. PubMed ID: 26739360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.