These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 283560)
1. [Surface defects in stone dies cast in silicone impressions]. Jørgensen KD; Asmussen E Tandlaegebladet; 1979 Jan; 83(2):43-5. PubMed ID: 283560 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Dimensional reproduction by combining elastomers and model materials]. Johansson EG; Blomberg B; Erhardson S Tandlakartidningen; 1974 Sep; 66(17):954-62. PubMed ID: 4532336 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of elastic impression materials. Stackhouse JA J Prosthet Dent; 1975 Sep; 34(3):305-13. PubMed ID: 22334993 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The linear accuracy of impressions and stone dies as affected by the thickness of the impression margin. Laufer BZ; Baharav H; Cardash HS Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(3):247-52. PubMed ID: 7916890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [The physical properties of silicone impression materials with hydrophilicity and hydrophobicity. Wetting, water absorption, surface structure of dental stone and dimensional change on stone dies]. Murakami H; Takehana S; Takenaka M; Abe T Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai Shi; 1990 Dec; 28(4):1105-14. PubMed ID: 2135145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dimensional accuracy of 3 silicone dental impression materials. Hassan AK East Mediterr Health J; 2006 Sep; 12(5):632-6. PubMed ID: 17333804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of dies captured by an intraoral digital impression system using parallel confocal imaging. Kim SY; Kim MJ; Han JS; Yeo IS; Lim YJ; Kwon HB Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(2):161-3. PubMed ID: 23476911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Dimensional measures of plaster samples obtained with elastic materials (c)]. Hoffer E; Pignanelli M Riv Ital Stomatol; 1976; (3):16-24. PubMed ID: 1076815 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparative studies on the accuracy of dental casts obtained from elastic impression materials (author's transl)]. Hide M Shikwa Gakuho; 1974 Oct; 74(10):1423-34. PubMed ID: 4532298 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Surface texture of stone model setting against elastomer impression materials. Nanami T; Ostlund SG Swed Dent J; 1984; 8(5):251-5. PubMed ID: 6395418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of stone-casts produced from selected addition-type silicone impressions. Finger W; Ohsawa M Scand J Dent Res; 1983 Feb; 91(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 6573762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relationship between critical convergence angle and surface defects in stone casts. Soh G; Chong YH Quintessence Int; 1990 Aug; 21(8):675-9. PubMed ID: 2094872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro study of the number of surface defects in monophase and two-phase addition silicone impressions. Millar BJ; Dunne SM; Robinson PB J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Jul; 80(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 9656175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of the type and technique used for impression making on the accuracy of elastomeric impression materials. Habib AN; Shehata MT Egypt Dent J; 1995 Oct; 41(4):1409-16. PubMed ID: 9497690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]