These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28356782)
1. An evaluation of exact matching and propensity score methods as applied in a comparative effectiveness study of inhaled corticosteroids in asthma. Burden A; Roche N; Miglio C; Hillyer EV; Postma DS; Herings RM; Overbeek JA; Khalid JM; van Eickels D; Price DB Pragmat Obs Res; 2017; 8():15-30. PubMed ID: 28356782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness of initiating extrafine-particle versus fine-particle inhaled corticosteroids as asthma therapy in the Netherlands. van der Molen T; Postma DS; Martin RJ; Herings RM; Overbeek JA; Thomas V; Miglio C; Dekhuijzen R; Roche N; Guilbert T; Israel E; van Aalderen W; Hillyer EV; van Rysewyk S; Price DB BMC Pulm Med; 2016 May; 16(1):80. PubMed ID: 27184175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Asthma-Related Outcomes in Patients Initiating Extrafine Ciclesonide or Fine-Particle Inhaled Corticosteroids. Postma DS; Dekhuijzen R; van der Molen T; Martin RJ; van Aalderen W; Roche N; Guilbert TW; Israel E; van Eickels D; Khalid JM; Herings RM; Overbeek JA; Miglio C; Thomas V; Hutton C; Hillyer EV; Price DB Allergy Asthma Immunol Res; 2017 Mar; 9(2):116-125. PubMed ID: 28102056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Applied comparison of large-scale propensity score matching and cardinality matching for causal inference in observational research. Fortin SP; Johnston SS; Schuemie MJ BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 May; 21(1):109. PubMed ID: 34030640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The performance of inverse probability of treatment weighting and full matching on the propensity score in the presence of model misspecification when estimating the effect of treatment on survival outcomes. Austin PC; Stuart EA Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Aug; 26(4):1654-1670. PubMed ID: 25934643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Choice of time period to identify confounders for propensity score matching, affected the estimate: a retrospective cohort study of drug effectiveness in asthmatic children. Osokogu OU; Khan J; Nakato S; Weibel D; de Ridder M; Sturkenboom MCJM; Verhamme K J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Sep; 101():107-115.e3. PubMed ID: 29378305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal hazard ratios. Austin PC Stat Med; 2013 Jul; 32(16):2837-49. PubMed ID: 23239115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Indirect covariate balance and residual confounding: An applied comparison of propensity score matching and cardinality matching. Fortin SP; Schuemie M Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2022 Dec; 31(12):1242-1252. PubMed ID: 35811396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Five Steps to Successfully Implement and Evaluate Propensity Score Matching in Clinical Research Studies. Staffa SJ; Zurakowski D Anesth Analg; 2018 Oct; 127(4):1066-1073. PubMed ID: 29324498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Propensity score matching versus coarsened exact matching in observational comparative effectiveness research. Guy D; Karp I; Wilk P; Chin J; Rodrigues G J Comp Eff Res; 2021 Aug; 10(11):939-951. PubMed ID: 34060903 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A novel approach for propensity score matching and stratification for multiple treatments: Application to an electronic health record-derived study. Brown DW; DeSantis SM; Greene TJ; Maroufy V; Yaseen A; Wu H; Williams G; Swartz MD Stat Med; 2020 Jul; 39(17):2308-2323. PubMed ID: 32297677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The performance of different propensity-score methods for estimating differences in proportions (risk differences or absolute risk reductions) in observational studies. Austin PC Stat Med; 2010 Sep; 29(20):2137-48. PubMed ID: 20108233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating the Utility of Coarsened Exact Matching for Pharmacoepidemiology Using Real and Simulated Claims Data. Ripollone JE; Huybrechts KF; Rothman KJ; Ferguson RE; Franklin JM Am J Epidemiol; 2020 Jun; 189(6):613-622. PubMed ID: 31845719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative Effectiveness of Step-up Therapies in Children with Asthma Prescribed Inhaled Corticosteroids: A Historical Cohort Study. Murray CS; Thomas M; Richardson K; Price DB; Turner SW J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract; 2017; 5(4):1082-1090.e7. PubMed ID: 28351789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Too much ado about propensity score models? Comparing methods of propensity score matching. Baser O Value Health; 2006; 9(6):377-85. PubMed ID: 17076868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The relative ability of different propensity score methods to balance measured covariates between treated and untreated subjects in observational studies. Austin PC Med Decis Making; 2009; 29(6):661-77. PubMed ID: 19684288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The feasibility of matching on a propensity score for acupuncture in a prospective cohort study of patients with chronic pain. Johnson ES; Dickerson JF; Vollmer WM; Rowley AM; Ritenbaugh C; Deyo RA; DeBar L BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Mar; 17(1):42. PubMed ID: 28302054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies. Austin PC Multivariate Behav Res; 2011 May; 46(3):399-424. PubMed ID: 21818162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]