231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28357452)
1. Determinants of health-related quality of life for patients after urinary lithotripsy: ureteroscopic vs. shock wave lithotripsy.
Hamamoto S; Unno R; Taguchi K; Naiki T; Ando R; Okada A; Inoue T; Okada S; AbdelRazek M; Kohri K; Yasui T;
Urolithiasis; 2018 Apr; 46(2):203-210. PubMed ID: 28357452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical efficacy, safety, and costs of percutaneous occlusive balloon catheter-assisted ureteroscopic lithotripsy for large impacted proximal ureteral calculi: a prospective, randomized study.
Qi S; Li Y; Liu X; Zhang C; Zhang H; Zhang Z; Xu Y
J Endourol; 2014 Sep; 28(9):1064-70. PubMed ID: 24786613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy for management of large upper third ureteral stones.
Lee YH; Tsai JY; Jiaan BP; Wu T; Yu CC
Urology; 2006 Mar; 67(3):480-4; discussion 484. PubMed ID: 16527562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stenting versus non-stenting following uncomplicated ureteroscopic lithotripsy: Comparsion and evaluation of symptoms.
Savić S; Vukotić V; Lazić M; Savić N
Vojnosanit Pregl; 2016 Sep; 73(9):850-6. PubMed ID: 29320618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of SWL and URS on health-related quality of life in proximal ureteral stones.
Ceylan Y; Ucer O; Bozkurt O; Gunlusoy B; Mertoglu O; Zumrutbas AE; Yildiz G; Irer B; Muezzinoglu T; Demir O
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2018 Jun; 27(3):148-152. PubMed ID: 28697638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the management of impacted, large, proximal ureteral stones.
Juan YS; Shen JT; Li CC; Wang CJ; Chuang SM; Huang CH; Wu WJ
Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2008 Apr; 24(4):204-9. PubMed ID: 18424357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Systematic Review on Comparative Analyses between Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy and Shock-Wave Lithotripsy for Ureter Stone According to Stone Size.
Jung HD; Hong Y; Lee JY; Lee SH
Medicina (Kaunas); 2021 Dec; 57(12):. PubMed ID: 34946314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Treatment of lower urethral calculi with extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy and pneumatic ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a comparison of effectiveness and complications.
Zhong W; Zeng G; Cai Y; Dai Q; Hu J; Wei H
Chin Med J (Engl); 2003 Jul; 116(7):1001-3. PubMed ID: 12890371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in comparison with ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the management of impacted upper ureteral stones larger than 12 mm.
Shao Y; Wang DW; Lu GL; Shen ZJ
World J Urol; 2015 Nov; 33(11):1841-5. PubMed ID: 25822707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ureteroscopy and laser stone fragmentation (URSL) for large (≥1 cm) paediatric stones: Outcomes from a university teaching hospital.
Featherstone NC; Somani BK; Griffin SJ
J Pediatr Urol; 2017 Apr; 13(2):202.e1-202.e7. PubMed ID: 28336220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of shock wave lithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery on health-related quality of life in 10-20 mm renal stones: a prospective randomized pilot study.
Atis G; Culpan M; Ucar T; Sendogan F; Kazan HO; Yildirim A
Urolithiasis; 2021 Jun; 49(3):247-253. PubMed ID: 33074423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Management of 10-15-mm proximal ureteral stones: ureteroscopy or extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy?
Ziaee SA; Halimiasl P; Aminsharifi A; Shafi H; Beigi FM; Basiri A
Urology; 2008 Jan; 71(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 18242359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Management of impacted proximal ureteral stone: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy with holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy.
Khalil M
Urol Ann; 2013 Apr; 5(2):88-92. PubMed ID: 23798864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Compare the outcome of ureteroscopic lithotripsy with ureteroscopic management after failed extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral calculi].
Wang DW; Wang JY; Cao XM
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Feb; 47(4):258-60. PubMed ID: 19570385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ureteroscopic and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for rather large renal pelvis calculi.
Tavakkoli Tabasi K; Baghban Haghighi M
Urol J; 2007; 4(4):221-5. PubMed ID: 18270946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness of treating ureteral stones in a Taipei City Hospital: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus lithoclast.
Huang CY; Chen SS; Chen LK
Urol Int; 2009; 83(4):410-5. PubMed ID: 19996647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation on postoperative analgesia after ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a randomized controlled trial.
Tu Q; Gan J; Shi J; Yu H; He S; Zhang J
Urolithiasis; 2019 Jun; 47(3):279-287. PubMed ID: 29557487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimal timing of ureteroscopic lithotripsy after the initial drainage treatment and risk factors for postoperative febrile urinary tract infection in patients with obstructive pyelonephritis: a retrospective study.
Itami Y; Miyake M; Owari T; Iwamoto T; Gotoh D; Momose H; Fujimoto K; Hirao S
BMC Urol; 2021 Jan; 21(1):10. PubMed ID: 33451332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Health-related quality of life in patients undergoing lithotripsy for urinary stones.
Kurahashi T; Miyake H; Shinozaki M; Oka N; Takenaka A; Hara I; Fujisawa M
Int Urol Nephrol; 2008; 40(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 17602302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness analysis of ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy and shock wave lithotripsy in the management of ureteral calculi in eastern China.
Zhang J; Shi Q; Wang GZ; Wang F; Jiang N
Urol Int; 2011; 86(4):470-5. PubMed ID: 21597268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
