261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28357501)
1. Robot-assisted intersphincteric resection facilitates an efficient sphincter-saving in patients with low rectal cancer.
Kim JC; Lee JL; Alotaibi AM; Yoon YS; Kim CW; Park IJ
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2017 Aug; 32(8):1137-1145. PubMed ID: 28357501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Oncological and anorectal functional outcomes of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection in lower rectal cancer, particularly the extent of sphincter resection and sphincter saving.
Kim JC; Lee JL; Bong JW; Seo JH; Kim CW; Park SH; Kim J
Surg Endosc; 2020 May; 34(5):2082-2094. PubMed ID: 31332563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcomes of ultra-low anterior resection combined with or without intersphincteric resection in lower rectal cancer patients.
Kim JC; Yu CS; Lim SB; Kim CW; Park IJ; Yoon YS
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2015 Oct; 30(10):1311-21. PubMed ID: 26141090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Technical, functional, and oncological validity of robot-assisted total-intersphincteric resection (T-ISR) for lower rectal cancer.
Kim JC; Lee JL; Kim CW; Kim JR; Kim J; Park SH
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2023 Jan; 49(1):188-195. PubMed ID: 35864011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term clinical and functional results of intersphincteric resection for lower rectal cancer.
Koyama M; Murata A; Sakamoto Y; Morohashi H; Takahashi S; Yoshida E; Hakamada K
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Jun; 21 Suppl 3():S422-8. PubMed ID: 24562938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Analysis on the technical characteristics and clinical efficacy of robotic-assisted intersphincteric resection for patients with low rectal cancer].
Liu HC; Li C; Zhang F; Wang XS; Zhang C; Luo HX; Song J; Yu PW; Tang B
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1137-1143. PubMed ID: 31874529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Completely abdominal intersphincteric resection for lower rectal cancer: feasibility and comparison of robot-assisted and open surgery.
Kim JC; Lim SB; Yoon YS; Park IJ; Kim CW; Kim CN
Surg Endosc; 2014 Sep; 28(9):2734-44. PubMed ID: 24687417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer in Japan.
Yamada K; Saiki Y; Takano S; Iwamoto K; Tanaka M; Fukunaga M; Noguchi T; Nakamura Y; Hisano S; Fukami K; Kuwahara D; Tsuji Y; Takano M; Usuku K; Ikeda T; Sugihara K
Surg Today; 2019 Apr; 49(4):275-285. PubMed ID: 30604217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure.
Kang J; Hur H; Min BS; Lee KY; Kim NK
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jan; 19(1):154-5. PubMed ID: 21822556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Colonic prolapse after intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer: a report of 12 cases.
Chau A; Frasson M; Debove C; Maggiori L; Panis Y
Tech Coloproctol; 2016 Oct; 20(10):701-5. PubMed ID: 27631305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the clinical results of abdominoperanal intersphincteric resection and abdominoperineal resection for lower rectal cancer.
Tsukamoto S; Kanemitsu Y; Shida D; Ochiai H; Mazaki J
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2017 May; 32(5):683-689. PubMed ID: 28091845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Short-term clinical outcome of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a retrospective comparison with conventional laparoscopy.
Park SY; Choi GS; Park JS; Kim HJ; Ryuk JP
Surg Endosc; 2013 Jan; 27(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 22752275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Comparison of oncology outcomes and anal function among laparoscopic partial, subtotal and total intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancers].
Zhang B; Liu Q; Zhao Y; Zhuo G; Yin S; Zhu J; Zhao K; Ding J
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Aug; 20(8):904-909. PubMed ID: 28836252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laparoscopic-Assisted Modified Intersphincter Resection for Ultralow Rectal Cancer.
Zhou H; Ruan C; Wang Z; Hu Z
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Apr; 25(4):947-948. PubMed ID: 29340993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: comparison of the operative, oncological, and functional outcomes.
Yoo BE; Cho JS; Shin JW; Lee DW; Kwak JM; Kim J; Kim SH
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Apr; 22(4):1219-25. PubMed ID: 25326398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Complete intersphincteric longitudinal muscle excision May Be key to reducing local recurrence during intersphincteric resection.
Kim JC; Kim CW; Lee JL; Yoon YS; Park IJ; Kim JR; Kim J; Park SH
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Jul; 47(7):1629-1636. PubMed ID: 33642088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Oncologic outcome of intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer.
Saito N; Sugito M; Ito M; Kobayashi A; Nishizawa Y; Yoneyama Y; Nishizawa Y; Minagawa N
World J Surg; 2009 Aug; 33(8):1750-6. PubMed ID: 19488814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: technique and short-term outcome for 29 consecutive patients.
Leong QM; Son DN; Cho JS; Baek SJ; Kwak JM; Amar AH; Kim SH
Surg Endosc; 2011 Sep; 25(9):2987-92. PubMed ID: 21484533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robotic-assisted transabdominal intersphincteric resection: a technique involving a completely abdominal approach and coloanal anastomosis.
Park SY; Choi GS; Park JS; Kim HJ; Choi WH; Ryuk JP
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2013 Feb; 23(1):e5-10. PubMed ID: 23386173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative analysis focusing on surgical and early oncological outcomes of open, laparoscopy-assisted, and robot-assisted approaches in rectal cancer patients.
Kim JC; Yu CS; Lim SB; Park IJ; Kim CW; Yoon YS
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2016 Jun; 31(6):1179-87. PubMed ID: 27080161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
