230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28357629)
1. Testing the validity of conflict drift-diffusion models for use in estimating cognitive processes: A parameter-recovery study.
White CN; Servant M; Logan GD
Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Feb; 25(1):286-301. PubMed ID: 28357629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Strategy and processing speed eclipse individual differences in control ability in conflict tasks.
Hedge C; Powell G; Bompas A; Sumner P
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Oct; 48(10):1448-1469. PubMed ID: 34591554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perceiving faces: Too much, too fast?-face specificity in response caution.
Meyer K; Schmitz F; Wilhelm O; Hildebrandt A
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Jan; 45(1):16-38. PubMed ID: 30475024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Conflict tasks and the diffusion framework: Insight in model constraints based on psychological laws.
Servant M; Montagnini A; Burle B
Cogn Psychol; 2014 Jul; 72():162-95. PubMed ID: 24762975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of conflict diffusion models in the flanker task through pseudolikelihood Bayes factors.
Evans NJ; Servant M
Psychol Rev; 2020 Jan; 127(1):114-135. PubMed ID: 31599635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Making strides in modeling individual differences: reply to Leite, Ratcliff, and White (2007).
Myerson J; Hale S; Chen J
Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Oct; 17(5):756-62. PubMed ID: 21061735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A revised diffusion model for conflict tasks.
Lee PS; Sewell DK
Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Feb; 31(1):1-31. PubMed ID: 37507646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Psychological interpretation of the ex-Gaussian and shifted Wald parameters: a diffusion model analysis.
Matzke D; Wagenmakers EJ
Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Oct; 16(5):798-817. PubMed ID: 19815782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retest reliability of the parameters of the Ratcliff diffusion model.
Lerche V; Voss A
Psychol Res; 2017 May; 81(3):629-652. PubMed ID: 27107855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A model-based approach to disentangling facilitation and interference effects in conflict tasks.
Evans NJ; Servant M
Psychol Rev; 2022 Oct; 129(5):1183-1209. PubMed ID: 35482645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Features of the conflict adaptation effect in mild cognitive decline.].
Velichkovsky BB; Tatarinov DV; Khlebnikova AA; Ziberova AV; Roshchina IF; Selezneva ND; Gavrilova SI
Adv Gerontol; 2020; 33(5):996-1001. PubMed ID: 33550759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dopaminergic Modulation of Human Intertemporal Choice: A Diffusion Model Analysis Using the D2-Receptor Antagonist Haloperidol.
Wagner B; Clos M; Sommer T; Peters J
J Neurosci; 2020 Oct; 40(41):7936-7948. PubMed ID: 32948675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Modeling individual differences in response time and accuracy in numeracy.
Ratcliff R; Thompson CA; McKoon G
Cognition; 2015 Apr; 137():115-136. PubMed ID: 25637690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diffusion models in experimental psychology: a practical introduction.
Voss A; Nagler M; Lerche V
Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(6):385-402. PubMed ID: 23895923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mood state and conflict adaptation: an update and a diffusion model analysis.
Schuch S; Pütz S
Psychol Res; 2021 Feb; 85(1):322-344. PubMed ID: 31659454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Slow and steady? Strategic adjustments in response caution are moderately reliable and correlate across tasks.
Hedge C; Vivian-Griffiths S; Powell G; Bompas A; Sumner P
Conscious Cogn; 2019 Oct; 75():102797. PubMed ID: 31421398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does response modality influence conflict? Modelling vocal and manual response Stroop interference.
Fennell A; Ratcliff R
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Nov; 45(11):2098-2119. PubMed ID: 30802093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modeling one-choice and two-choice driving tasks.
Ratcliff R
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Aug; 77(6):2134-44. PubMed ID: 25944448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The drift diffusion model as the choice rule in inter-temporal and risky choice: A case study in medial orbitofrontal cortex lesion patients and controls.
Peters J; D'Esposito M
PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 Apr; 16(4):e1007615. PubMed ID: 32310962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cognitive psychology meets psychometric theory: on the relation between process models for decision making and latent variable models for individual differences.
van der Maas HLJ; Molenaar D; Maris G; Kievit RA; Borsboom D
Psychol Rev; 2011 Apr; 118(2):339-356. PubMed ID: 21401290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
