These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28357655)

  • 1. Is breast compression associated with breast cancer detection and other early performance measures in a population-based breast cancer screening program?
    Moshina N; Sebuødegård S; Hofvind S
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Jun; 163(3):605-613. PubMed ID: 28357655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital breast tomosynthesis in a population based mammographic screening program: Breast compression and early performance measures.
    Moshina N; Larsen M; Holen ÅS; Waade GG; Aase HS; Hofvind S
    Eur J Radiol; 2021 Jun; 139():109665. PubMed ID: 33823373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of breast compression pressure on the performance of population-based mammography screening.
    Holland K; Sechopoulos I; Mann RM; den Heeten GJ; van Gils CH; Karssemeijer N
    Breast Cancer Res; 2017 Nov; 19(1):126. PubMed ID: 29183348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Positive predictive values by mammographic density and screening mode in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program.
    Moshina N; Ursin G; Roman M; Sebuødegård S; Hofvind S
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):248-254. PubMed ID: 26724673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Screening at stationary versus mobile units in BreastScreen Norway.
    Holen Å; Sebuødegård S; Waade GG; Aase H; Hopland NM; Pedersen K; Larsen M; Tsuruda KM; Hofvind S
    J Med Screen; 2020 Mar; 27(1):31-39. PubMed ID: 31554445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mammographic breast density: How it affects performance indicators in screening programmes?
    Posso M; Louro J; Sánchez M; Román M; Vidal C; Sala M; Baré M; Castells X;
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jan; 110():81-87. PubMed ID: 30599878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With Digital Mammography: Outcomes Analysis From 3 Years of Breast Cancer Screening.
    McDonald ES; Oustimov A; Weinstein SP; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF
    JAMA Oncol; 2016 Jun; 2(6):737-43. PubMed ID: 26893205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cross-national comparison of screening mammography accuracy measures in U.S., Norway, and Spain.
    Domingo L; Hofvind S; Hubbard RA; Román M; Benkeser D; Sala M; Castells X
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Aug; 26(8):2520-8. PubMed ID: 26560729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of compression force and pressure at prevalent screening on subsequent re-attendance in a national screening program.
    Moshina N; Sebuødegård S; Holen ÅS; Waade GG; Tsuruda K; Hofvind S
    Prev Med; 2018 Mar; 108():129-136. PubMed ID: 29337068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Are mammography image acquisition factors, compression pressure and paddle tilt, associated with breast cancer detection in screening?
    Hudson SM; Wilkinson LS; De Stavola BL; Dos-Santos-Silva I
    Br J Radiol; 2023 Oct; 96(1150):20230085. PubMed ID: 37660396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tumor characteristics associated with mammographic detection of breast cancer in the Ontario breast screening program.
    Kirsh VA; Chiarelli AM; Edwards SA; O'Malley FP; Shumak RS; Yaffe MJ; Boyd NF
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2011 Jun; 103(12):942-50. PubMed ID: 21540443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of the transition from screen-film to digital screening mammography on interval cancer characteristics and treatment - a population based study from the Netherlands.
    Nederend J; Duijm LE; Louwman MW; Coebergh JW; Roumen RM; Lohle PN; Roukema JA; Rutten MJ; van Steenbergen LN; Ernst MF; Jansen FH; Plaisier ML; Hooijen MJ; Voogd AC
    Eur J Cancer; 2014 Jan; 50(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 24275518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of recall rate on earlier screen detection of breast cancers based on the Dutch performance indicators.
    Otten JD; Karssemeijer N; Hendriks JH; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; Verbeek AL; de Koning HJ; Holland R
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 May; 97(10):748-54. PubMed ID: 15900044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance of Screening Mammography: A Report of the Alliance for Breast Cancer Screening in Korea.
    Lee EH; Kim KW; Kim YJ; Shin DR; Park YM; Lim HS; Park JS; Kim HW; Kim YM; Kim HJ; Jun JK
    Korean J Radiol; 2016; 17(4):489-96. PubMed ID: 27390540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Volumetric breast density affects performance of digital screening mammography.
    Wanders JO; Holland K; Veldhuis WB; Mann RM; Pijnappel RM; Peeters PH; van Gils CH; Karssemeijer N
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Feb; 162(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 28012087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. BreastScreen-based mammography screening in women with a personal history of breast cancer, Western Australian study.
    Houssami N; Tresham JJ; Fritschi L; Wylie LE
    Med J Aust; 2011 Oct; 195(8):460-4. PubMed ID: 22004397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Results of intermediate measures from a population-based, randomized trial of mammographic screening prevalence and detection of breast carcinoma among Asian women: the Singapore Breast Screening Project.
    Ng EH; Ng FC; Tan PH; Low SC; Chiang G; Tan KP; Seow A; Emmanuel S; Tan CH; Ho GH; Ng LT; Wilde CC
    Cancer; 1998 Apr; 82(8):1521-8. PubMed ID: 9554530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nation-wide data on screening performance during the transition to digital mammography: observations in 6 million screens.
    van Luijt PA; Fracheboud J; Heijnsdijk EA; den Heeten GJ; de Koning HJ;
    Eur J Cancer; 2013 Nov; 49(16):3517-25. PubMed ID: 23871248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of digital mammography and screen-film mammography in breast cancer screening: a review in the Irish breast screening program.
    Hambly NM; McNicholas MM; Phelan N; Hargaden GC; O'Doherty A; Flanagan FL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Oct; 193(4):1010-8. PubMed ID: 19770323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.