These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28357679)

  • 1. Changes in quality of life after elective surgery: an observational study comparing two measures.
    Kronzer VL; Jerry MR; Ben Abdallah A; Wildes TS; McKinnon SL; Sharma A; Avidan MS
    Qual Life Res; 2017 Aug; 26(8):2093-2102. PubMed ID: 28357679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What Are the Minimum Clinically Important Differences in SF-36 Scores in Patients with Orthopaedic Oncologic Conditions?
    Ogura K; Yakoub MA; Christ AB; Fujiwara T; Nikolic Z; Boland PJ; Healey JH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Sep; 478(9):2148-2158. PubMed ID: 32568896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of the minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical article.
    Parker SL; Godil SS; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb; 18(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 23176164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after extension of fusion for adjacent-segment disease.
    Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau D; Adogwa O; Cheng JS; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jan; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 21962034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimum clinically important difference of the health-related quality of life scales in adult spinal deformity calculated by latent class analysis: is it appropriate to use the same values for surgical and nonsurgical patients?
    Yuksel S; Ayhan S; Nabiyev V; Domingo-Sabat M; Vila-Casademunt A; Obeid I; Perez-Grueso FS; Acaroglu E;
    Spine J; 2019 Jan; 19(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 30010046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of health-related quality of life in spine treatment: conversion from SF-36 to VR-12.
    Gornet MF; Copay AG; Sorensen KM; Schranck FW
    Spine J; 2018 Jul; 18(7):1292-1297. PubMed ID: 29501747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: understanding clinical versus statistical significance.
    Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Adogwa O; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 May; 16(5):471-8. PubMed ID: 22324801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preoperative Short Form Health Survey Score Is Predictive of Return to Play and Minimal Clinically Important Difference at a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
    Nwachukwu BU; Chang B; Voleti PB; Berkanish P; Cohn MR; Altchek DW; Allen AA; Williams RJ
    Am J Sports Med; 2017 Oct; 45(12):2784-2790. PubMed ID: 28727937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of complications within 90 days on patient-reported outcomes 3 months and 12 months following elective surgery for lumbar degenerative disease.
    Chotai S; Parker SL; Sivaganesan A; Sielatycki JA; Asher AL; McGirt MJ; Devin CJ
    Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Dec; 39(6):E8. PubMed ID: 26621422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimum clinically important difference of major patient-reported outcome measures in patients undergoing decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Ogura Y; Ogura K; Kobayashi Y; Kitagawa T; Yonezawa Y; Takahashi Y; Yoshida K; Yasuda A; Shinozaki Y; Ogawa J
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2020 Sep; 196():105966. PubMed ID: 32485521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of baseline veterans RAND-12 physical composite score on postoperative patient-reported outcome measures following lateral lumbar interbody fusion.
    Oyetayo OO; Nie JW; Hartman TJ; MacGregor KR; Zheng E; Anwar FN; Roca AM; Federico VP; Massel DH; Lopez GD; Sayari AJ; Singh K
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2023 Nov; 165(11):3531-3537. PubMed ID: 37688649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Determination of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in pain, disability, and quality of life after revision fusion for symptomatic pseudoarthrosis.
    Parker SL; Adogwa O; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Anderson WN; Cheng JS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2012 Dec; 12(12):1122-8. PubMed ID: 23158968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Two-year validation and minimal clinically important difference of the Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey Physical Component Score in patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Lynch CP; Cha EDK; Mohan S; Geoghegan CE; Jadczak CN; Singh K
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2022 May; 36(5):731-740. PubMed ID: 34798597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accurately measuring the quality and effectiveness of cervical spine surgery in registry efforts: determining the most valid and responsive instruments.
    Godil SS; Parker SL; Zuckerman SL; Mendenhall SK; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2015 Jun; 15(6):1203-9. PubMed ID: 24076442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Veterans Rand-12 Physical Composite Score Prognosticates Postoperative Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.
    Roca AM; Anwar FN; Loya AC; Medakkar SS; Kaul A; Wolf JC; Khosla I; Federico VP; Sayari AJ; Lopez GD; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2023 Dec; 180():e756-e764. PubMed ID: 37821028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What Preoperative Factors are Associated With Not Achieving a Minimum Clinically Important Difference After THA? Findings from an International Multicenter Study.
    Rojanasopondist P; Galea VP; Connelly JW; Matuszak SJ; Rolfson O; Bragdon CR; Malchau H
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Jun; 477(6):1301-1312. PubMed ID: 31136425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prognostic value in preoperative Veterans RAND-12 mental Component score on clinical outcomes for patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Roca AM; Anwar FN; Nie JW; Hartman TJ; Medakkar SS; Loya AC; MacGregor KR; Oyetayo OO; Zheng E; Federico VP; Lopez GD; Sayari AJ; Singh K
    J Clin Neurosci; 2024 Jul; 125():12-16. PubMed ID: 38733898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Minimum Clinically Important Difference for Patient Health Questionnaire-9 in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion.
    Lynch CP; Cha EDK; Jenkins NW; Parrish JM; Mohan S; Jadczak CN; Geoghegan CE; Singh K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2021 May; 46(9):603-609. PubMed ID: 33290370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What is the Minimum Clinically Important Difference for the WOMAC Index After TKA?
    Clement ND; Bardgett M; Weir D; Holland J; Gerrand C; Deehan DJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Oct; 476(10):2005-2014. PubMed ID: 30179956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of health-related quality of life after surgical treatment of focal symptomatic spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.
    Rampersaud YR; Ravi B; Lewis SJ; Stas V; Barron R; Davey R; Mahomed N
    Spine J; 2008; 8(2):296-304. PubMed ID: 17669690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.