These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28358548)

  • 41. Diminishing-cues retrieval practice: A memory-enhancing technique that works when regular testing doesn't.
    Fiechter JL; Benjamin AS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Oct; 25(5):1868-1876. PubMed ID: 28849580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Sleep reduces the testing effect-But not after corrective feedback and prolonged retention interval.
    Abel M; Haller V; Köck H; Pötschke S; Heib D; Schabus M; Bäuml KT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Feb; 45(2):272-287. PubMed ID: 29698042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Retrieval practice can insulate items against intralist interference: Evidence from the list-length effect, output interference, and retrieval-induced forgetting.
    Kliegl O; Bäuml KH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Feb; 42(2):202-14. PubMed ID: 26301963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Metacognitive control in self-regulated learning: Conditions affecting the choice of restudying versus retrieval practice.
    Toppino TC; LaVan MH; Iaconelli RT
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Oct; 46(7):1164-1177. PubMed ID: 29845590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Test-potentiated learning: distinguishing between direct and indirect effects of tests.
    Arnold KM; McDermott KB
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):940-5. PubMed ID: 22774852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Expanding retrieval practice promotes short-term retention, but equally spaced retrieval enhances long-term retention.
    Karpicke JD; Roediger HL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Jul; 33(4):704-19. PubMed ID: 17576148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Fact learning: how information accuracy, delay, and repeated testing change retention and retrieval experience.
    Barber SJ; Rajaram S; Marsh EJ
    Memory; 2008 Nov; 16(8):934-46. PubMed ID: 18949663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Interfering effects of retrieval in learning new information.
    Finn B; Roediger HL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Nov; 39(6):1665-81. PubMed ID: 23565780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Sleep can reduce the testing effect: it enhances recall of restudied items but can leave recall of retrieved items unaffected.
    Bäuml KH; Holterman C; Abel M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Nov; 40(6):1568-81. PubMed ID: 24933697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Retrieval practice enhances near but not far transfer of spatial memory.
    Brunyé TT; Smith AM; Hendel D; Gardony AL; Martis SB; Taylor HA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Jan; 46(1):24-45. PubMed ID: 30998073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. When and why do retrieval attempts enhance subsequent encoding?
    Grimaldi PJ; Karpicke JD
    Mem Cognit; 2012 May; 40(4):505-13. PubMed ID: 22238214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Where and how to learn: The interactive benefits of contextual variation, restudying, and retrieval practice for learning.
    Imundo MN; Pan SC; Bjork EL; Bjork RA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Mar; 74(3):413-424. PubMed ID: 33174522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Cued recall from image and sentence memory: a shift from episodic to identical elements representation.
    Rickard TC; Bajic D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):734-48. PubMed ID: 16822144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Enhancing retention through reconsolidation: negative emotional arousal following retrieval enhances later recall.
    Finn B; Roediger HL
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Jun; 22(6):781-6. PubMed ID: 21537055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Testing the primary and convergent retrieval model of recall: Recall practice produces faster recall success but also faster recall failure.
    Hopper WJ; Huber DE
    Mem Cognit; 2019 May; 47(4):816-841. PubMed ID: 30737729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Test-potentiated learning: three independent replications, a disconfirmed hypothesis, and an unexpected boundary condition.
    Wissman KT; Rawson KA
    Memory; 2018 Apr; 26(4):406-414. PubMed ID: 28691577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Testing effects of free recall on organization in whole/part and part/whole transfer.
    Bacso SA; Marmurek HH
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Nov; 171():99-109. PubMed ID: 27750044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The roles of encoding strategies and retrieval practice in test-expectancy effects.
    Cho KW; Neely JH
    Memory; 2017 May; 25(5):626-635. PubMed ID: 27348692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. How motor practice shapes memory: retrieval but not extra study can cause forgetting.
    Tempel T; Frings C
    Memory; 2016 Aug; 24(7):903-15. PubMed ID: 26274024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Retrieval practice decreases processing load of recall: Evidence revealed by pupillometry.
    Pajkossy P; Szőllősi Á; Racsmány M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Sep; 143():88-95. PubMed ID: 31301313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.