These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28358896)

  • 1. Detecting disease-associated genomic outcomes using constrained mixture of Bayesian hierarchical models for paired data.
    Li Y; Morrow J; Raby B; Tantisira K; Weiss ST; Huang W; Qiu W
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0174602. PubMed ID: 28358896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. jmBIG: enhancing dynamic risk prediction and personalized medicine through joint modeling of longitudinal and survival data in big routinely collected data.
    Bhattacharjee A; Rajbongshi BK; Vishwakarma GK
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 Aug; 24(1):172. PubMed ID: 39107693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A model-based clustering via mixture of hierarchical models with covariate adjustment for detecting differentially expressed genes from paired design.
    Zhang Y; Liu W; Qiu W
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2023 Nov; 24(1):423. PubMed ID: 37940858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combining cow and bull reference populations to increase accuracy of genomic prediction and genome-wide association studies.
    Calus MP; de Haas Y; Veerkamp RF
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Oct; 96(10):6703-15. PubMed ID: 23891299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bayesian methods applied to GWAS.
    Fernando RL; Garrick D
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1019():237-74. PubMed ID: 23756894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Implementing a QTL detection study (GWAS) using genomic prediction methodology.
    Garrick DJ; Fernando RL
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1019():275-98. PubMed ID: 23756895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bayesian state space models for dynamic genetic network construction across multiple tissues.
    Liang Y; Kelemen A
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2016 Aug; 15(4):273-90. PubMed ID: 27343475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. BhGLM: Bayesian hierarchical GLMs and survival models, with applications to genomics and epidemiology.
    Yi N; Tang Z; Zhang X; Guo B
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Apr; 35(8):1419-1421. PubMed ID: 30219850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of genomic predictions using genomic relationship matrices built with different weighting factors to account for locus-specific variances.
    Su G; Christensen OF; Janss L; Lund MS
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Oct; 97(10):6547-59. PubMed ID: 25129495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. BAYESIAN BICLUSTERING FOR PATIENT STRATIFICATION.
    Khakabimamaghani S; Ester M
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2016; 21():345-56. PubMed ID: 26776199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Bayesian integrative approach for multi-platform genomic data: A kidney cancer case study.
    Chekouo T; Stingo FC; Doecke JD; Do KA
    Biometrics; 2017 Jun; 73(2):615-624. PubMed ID: 27669160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bayesian Networks for Risk Prediction Using Real-World Data: A Tool for Precision Medicine.
    Arora P; Boyne D; Slater JJ; Gupta A; Brenner DR; Druzdzel MJ
    Value Health; 2019 Apr; 22(4):439-445. PubMed ID: 30975395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Precision Genetic and Genomic Medicine in the Middle East and North Africa Region: Are We There Yet?
    Bilani N; Dagher M; Zgheib NK
    Public Health Genomics; 2017; 20(3):149-157. PubMed ID: 28478447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of a Bayesian model including QTL markers increases prediction reliability when test animals are distant from the reference population.
    Ma P; Lund MS; Aamand GP; Su G
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Aug; 102(8):7237-7247. PubMed ID: 31155255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Variational Bayes Genomic-Enabled Prediction Model with Genotype × Environment Interaction.
    Montesinos-López OA; Montesinos-López A; Crossa J; Montesinos-López JC; Luna-Vázquez FJ; Salinas-Ruiz J; Herrera-Morales JR; Buenrostro-Mariscal R
    G3 (Bethesda); 2017 Jun; 7(6):1833-1853. PubMed ID: 28391241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bayesian Computation Methods for Inferring Regulatory Network Models Using Biomedical Data.
    Tian T
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 939():289-307. PubMed ID: 27807752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Designing a GWAS: power, sample size, and data structure.
    Ball RD
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1019():37-98. PubMed ID: 23756887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gene-Environment Interaction in the Era of Precision Medicine.
    Li J; Li X; Zhang S; Snyder M
    Cell; 2019 Mar; 177(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 30901546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Confident difference criterion: a new Bayesian differentially expressed gene selection algorithm with applications.
    Yu F; Chen MH; Kuo L; Talbott H; Davis JS
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Aug; 16():245. PubMed ID: 26250443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.