These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28358941)

  • 1. Automatic Gleason grading of prostate cancer using quantitative phase imaging and machine learning.
    Nguyen TH; Sridharan S; Macias V; Kajdacsy-Balla A; Melamed J; Do MN; Popescu G
    J Biomed Opt; 2017 Mar; 22(3):36015. PubMed ID: 28358941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of a Deep Learning Algorithm for the Histopathologic Diagnosis and Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer Biopsies: A Pilot Study.
    Kott O; Linsley D; Amin A; Karagounis A; Jeffers C; Golijanin D; Serre T; Gershman B
    Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Mar; 7(2):347-351. PubMed ID: 31767543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Evaluate Performance of a Classifier for Automatic Grading of Prostate Cancer From Digitized Histopathologic Images.
    Nir G; Karimi D; Goldenberg SL; Fazli L; Skinnider BF; Tavassoli P; Turbin D; Villamil CF; Wang G; Thompson DJS; Black PC; Salcudean SE
    JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Mar; 2(3):e190442. PubMed ID: 30848813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automatic grading of prostate cancer in digitized histopathology images: Learning from multiple experts.
    Nir G; Hor S; Karimi D; Fazli L; Skinnider BF; Tavassoli P; Turbin D; Villamil CF; Wang G; Wilson RS; Iczkowski KA; Lucia MS; Black PC; Abolmaesumi P; Goldenberg SL; Salcudean SE
    Med Image Anal; 2018 Dec; 50():167-180. PubMed ID: 30340027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Going deeper through the Gleason scoring scale: An automatic end-to-end system for histology prostate grading and cribriform pattern detection.
    Silva-Rodríguez J; Colomer A; Sales MA; Molina R; Naranjo V
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Oct; 195():105637. PubMed ID: 32653747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.
    Epstein JI; Amin MB; Reuter VE; Humphrey PA
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2017 Apr; 41(4):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 28177964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Deep Learning-Based Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer From Histopathology Images-Role of Multiscale Decision Aggregation and Data Augmentation.
    Karimi D; Nir G; Fazli L; Black PC; Goldenberg L; Salcudean SE
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2020 May; 24(5):1413-1426. PubMed ID: 31567104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Deep learning for automatic Gleason pattern classification for grade group determination of prostate biopsies.
    Lucas M; Jansen I; Savci-Heijink CD; Meijer SL; de Boer OJ; van Leeuwen TG; de Bruin DM; Marquering HA
    Virchows Arch; 2019 Jul; 475(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 31098801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical Proof-of-concept of a Novel Platform Utilizing Biopsy-derived Live Single Cells, Phenotypic Biomarkers, and Machine Learning Toward a Precision Risk Stratification Test for Prostate Cancer Grade Groups 1 and 2 (Gleason 3 + 3 and 3 + 4).
    Albala D; Manak MS; Varsanik JS; Rashid HH; Mouraviev V; Zappala SM; Ette E; Kella N; Rieger-Christ KM; Sant GR; Chander AC
    Urology; 2019 Feb; 124():198-206. PubMed ID: 30312670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Histologic tissue components provide major cues for machine learning-based prostate cancer detection and grading on prostatectomy specimens.
    Han W; Johnson C; Gaed M; Gómez JA; Moussa M; Chin JL; Pautler S; Bauman GS; Ward AD
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jun; 10(1):9911. PubMed ID: 32555410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automated gleason grading on prostate biopsy slides by statistical representations of homology profile.
    Yan C; Nakane K; Wang X; Fu Y; Lu H; Fan X; Feldman MD; Madabhushi A; Xu J
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Oct; 194():105528. PubMed ID: 32470903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exploring automatic prostate histopathology image Gleason grading via local structure modeling.
    Wang D; Foran DJ; Ren J; Zhong H; Kim IY; Qi X
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015; 2015():2649-52. PubMed ID: 26736836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gleason score 3 + 4=7 prostate cancer with minimal quantity of gleason pattern 4 on needle biopsy is associated with low-risk tumor in radical prostatectomy specimen.
    Huang CC; Kong MX; Zhou M; Rosenkrantz AB; Taneja SS; Melamed J; Deng FM
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2014 Aug; 38(8):1096-101. PubMed ID: 24832163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prostate Cancer Genomic Classifier Relates More Strongly to Gleason Grade Group Than Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Score in Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging-ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsies.
    Martin DT; Ghabili K; Levi A; Humphrey PA; Sprenkle PC
    Urology; 2019 Mar; 125():64-72. PubMed ID: 30552940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automatic diagnosis and grading of Prostate Cancer with weakly supervised learning on whole slide images.
    Xiang J; Wang X; Wang X; Zhang J; Yang S; Yang W; Han X; Liu Y
    Comput Biol Med; 2023 Jan; 152():106340. PubMed ID: 36481762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Multi-scale U-Net for Semantic Segmentation of Histological Images from Radical Prostatectomies.
    Li J; Sarma KV; Chung Ho K; Gertych A; Knudsen BS; Arnold CW
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2017; 2017():1140-1148. PubMed ID: 29854182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Machine learning approaches to analyze histological images of tissues from radical prostatectomies.
    Gertych A; Ing N; Ma Z; Fuchs TJ; Salman S; Mohanty S; Bhele S; Velásquez-Vacca A; Amin MB; Knudsen BS
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2015 Dec; 46 Pt 2(Pt 2):197-208. PubMed ID: 26362074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Outcomes of Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer with minimal amounts (<6%) vs ≥6% of Gleason pattern 4 tissue in needle biopsy specimens.
    Kır G; Seneldir H; Gumus E
    Ann Diagn Pathol; 2016 Feb; 20():48-51. PubMed ID: 26750655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.
    Epstein JI; Egevad L; Amin MB; Delahunt B; Srigley JR; Humphrey PA;
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Feb; 40(2):244-52. PubMed ID: 26492179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Path R-CNN for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Gleason Grading of Histological Images.
    Li W; Li J; Sarma KV; Ho KC; Shen S; Knudsen BS; Gertych A; Arnold CW
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2019 Apr; 38(4):945-954. PubMed ID: 30334752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.