263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28359329)
1. Comparison of stool versus rectal swab samples and storage conditions on bacterial community profiles.
Bassis CM; Moore NM; Lolans K; Seekatz AM; Weinstein RA; Young VB; Hayden MK;
BMC Microbiol; 2017 Mar; 17(1):78. PubMed ID: 28359329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of rectal swab, glove tip, and participant-collected stool techniques for gut microbiome sampling.
Short MI; Hudson R; Besasie BD; Reveles KR; Shah DP; Nicholson S; Johnson-Pais TL; Weldon K; Lai Z; Leach RJ; Fongang B; Liss MA
BMC Microbiol; 2021 Jan; 21(1):26. PubMed ID: 33446094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An ambient-temperature storage and stabilization device performs comparably to flash-frozen collection for stool metabolomics in infants.
Ramamoorthy S; Levy S; Mohamed M; Abdelghani A; Evans AM; Miller LAD; Mehta L; Moore S; Freinkman E; Hourigan SK
BMC Microbiol; 2021 Feb; 21(1):59. PubMed ID: 33618670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Collection of non-meconium stool on fecal occult blood cards is an effective method for fecal microbiota studies in infants.
Wong WSW; Clemency N; Klein E; Provenzano M; Iyer R; Niederhuber JE; Hourigan SK
Microbiome; 2017 Sep; 5(1):114. PubMed ID: 28870234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of sampling and storage procedures on preserving the community structure of stool microbiota: A simple at-home toilet-paper collection method.
Al KF; Bisanz JE; Gloor GB; Reid G; Burton JP
J Microbiol Methods; 2018 Jan; 144():117-121. PubMed ID: 29155236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Systematic Analysis of Impact of Sampling Regions and Storage Methods on Fecal Gut Microbiome and Metabolome Profiles.
Liang Y; Dong T; Chen M; He L; Wang T; Liu X; Chang H; Mao JH; Hang B; Snijders AM; Xia Y
mSphere; 2020 Jan; 5(1):. PubMed ID: 31915218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Rectal Swabs from Critically Ill Patients Provide Discordant Representations of the Gut Microbiome Compared to Stool Samples.
Fair K; Dunlap DG; Fitch A; Bogdanovich T; Methé B; Morris A; McVerry BJ; Kitsios GD
mSphere; 2019 Jul; 4(4):. PubMed ID: 31341070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An alternative storage method for characterization of the intestinal microbiota through next generation sequencing.
Ribeiro RM; Souza-Basqueira M; Oliveira LC; Salles FC; Pereira NB; Sabino EC
Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo; 2018 Nov; 60():e77. PubMed ID: 30517247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sampling and pyrosequencing methods for characterizing bacterial communities in the human gut using 16S sequence tags.
Wu GD; Lewis JD; Hoffmann C; Chen YY; Knight R; Bittinger K; Hwang J; Chen J; Berkowsky R; Nessel L; Li H; Bushman FD
BMC Microbiol; 2010 Jul; 10():206. PubMed ID: 20673359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Collection media and delayed freezing effects on microbial composition of human stool.
Flores R; Shi J; Yu G; Ma B; Ravel J; Goedert JJ; Sinha R
Microbiome; 2015; 3():33. PubMed ID: 26269741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Storage conditions of intestinal microbiota matter in metagenomic analysis.
Cardona S; Eck A; Cassellas M; Gallart M; Alastrue C; Dore J; Azpiroz F; Roca J; Guarner F; Manichanh C
BMC Microbiol; 2012 Jul; 12():158. PubMed ID: 22846661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fecal microbiome composition and diversity of cryopreserved canine stool at different duration and storage conditions.
Barko P; Nguyen-Edquilang J; Williams DA; Gal A
PLoS One; 2024; 19(2):e0294730. PubMed ID: 38324560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of room temperature transport vials on DNA quality and phylogenetic composition of faecal microbiota of elderly adults and infants.
Hill CJ; Brown JR; Lynch DB; Jeffery IB; Ryan CA; Ross RP; Stanton C; O'Toole PW
Microbiome; 2016 May; 4(1):19. PubMed ID: 27160322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interpersonal Variations in Gut Microbiota Profiles Supersedes the Effects of Differing Fecal Storage Conditions.
Bundgaard-Nielsen C; Hagstrøm S; Sørensen S
Sci Rep; 2018 Nov; 8(1):17367. PubMed ID: 30478355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High-throughput DNA extraction strategy for fecal microbiome studies.
Isokääntä H; Tomnikov N; Vanhatalo S; Munukka E; Huovinen P; Hakanen AJ; Kallonen T
Microbiol Spectr; 2024 Jun; 12(6):e0293223. PubMed ID: 38747618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of the impact of different fecal storage protocols on the microbiota diversity and composition: a pilot study.
Moossavi S; Engen PA; Ghanbari R; Green SJ; Naqib A; Bishehsari F; Merat S; Poustchi H; Keshavarzian A; Malekzadeh R
BMC Microbiol; 2019 Jun; 19(1):145. PubMed ID: 31253096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of time and temperature on gut microbiota and SCFA composition in stool samples.
Cunningham JL; Bramstång L; Singh A; Jayarathna S; Rasmusson AJ; Moazzami A; Müller B
PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0236944. PubMed ID: 32745090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Changes in Microbiota Profiles After Prolonged Frozen Storage of Stool Suspensions.
Dorsaz S; Charretier Y; Girard M; Gaïa N; Leo S; Schrenzel J; Harbarth S; Huttner B; Lazarevic V
Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2020; 10():77. PubMed ID: 32185143
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Rapidly Processed Stool Swabs Approximate Stool Microbiota Profiles.
Bokulich NA; Maldonado J; Kang DW; Krajmalnik-Brown R; Caporaso JG
mSphere; 2019 Apr; 4(2):. PubMed ID: 30971445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability of a participant-friendly fecal collection method for microbiome analyses: a step towards large sample size investigation.
Szopinska JW; Gresse R; van der Marel S; Boekhorst J; Lukovac S; van Swam I; Franke B; Timmerman H; Belzer C; Arias Vasquez A
BMC Microbiol; 2018 Sep; 18(1):110. PubMed ID: 30189859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
