126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28361024)
1. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in linear measurements on axial images obtained by cone-beam computed tomography.
da Silva NC; Barriviera M; Junqueira JL; Panzarella FK; Raitz R
Imaging Sci Dent; 2017 Mar; 47(1):11-15. PubMed ID: 28361024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability and accuracy of cone beam computed tomography versus conventional multidetector computed tomography for image-guided craniofacial implant planning: An in vitro study.
Dings JP; Verhamme L; Merkx MA; Xi T; Meijer GJ; Maal TJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(3):665–672. PubMed ID: 30934042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability and accuracy of linear measurements in cone-beam computed tomography using different software programs and voxel sizes.
Tolentino ES; Yamashita FC; de Albuquerque S; Walewski LA; Iwaki LCV; Takeshita WM; Silva MC
J Conserv Dent; 2018; 21(6):607-612. PubMed ID: 30546204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. CBCT Performance and Endodontic Sealer Influence in the Diagnosis of Vertical Root Fractures.
Freitas-E-Silva A; Mármora B; Barriviera M; Panzarella FK; Raitz R
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 May; 20(5):552-556. PubMed ID: 31316016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Linear Measurement Accuracy of Eight Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scanners.
Kosalagood P; Silkosessak OC; Pittayapat P; Pisarnturakit P; Pauwels R; Jacobs R
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 17(6):1217-27. PubMed ID: 24673845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of linear measurement accuracy obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom VG).
Moshfeghi M; Tavakoli MA; Hosseini ET; Hosseini AT; Hosseini IT
Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2012 Dec; 9(Suppl 1):S57-62. PubMed ID: 23814563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy assessment of the axial images obtained from cone beam computed tomography.
Panzarella FK; Junqueira JL; Oliveira LB; de Araújo NS; Costa C
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Sep; 40(6):369-78. PubMed ID: 21831977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of linear measurements using cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography in dental implant treatment planning.
Luangchana P; Pornprasertsuk-Damrongsri S; Kiattavorncharoen S; Jirajariyavej B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(6):1287-94. PubMed ID: 26574854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of linear measurements on 3D surface models using CBCT data segmentation obtained by automatic standard pre-set thresholds in two segmentation software programs: an in vitro study.
Poleti ML; Fernandes TM; Pagin O; Moretti MR; Rubira-Bullen IR
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Jan; 20(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 25963719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of linear measurements in cone beam computed tomography with different voxel sizes.
Torres MG; Campos PS; Segundo NP; Navarro M; Crusoé-Rebello I
Implant Dent; 2012 Apr; 21(2):150-5. PubMed ID: 22382754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of cone-beam computed tomographic scan mode for detection of horizontal root fracture.
Costa FF; Pinheiro LR; Umetsubo OS; dos Santos O; Gaia BF; Cavalcanti MG
J Endod; 2014 Sep; 40(9):1472-6. PubMed ID: 25146036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Image distortion and spatial resolution of a commercially available cone-beam computed tomography machine.
Ballrick JW; Palomo JM; Ruch E; Amberman BD; Hans MG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Oct; 134(4):573-82. PubMed ID: 18929276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy and repeatability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements used in the determination of facial indices in the laboratory setup.
Moerenhout BA; Gelaude F; Swennen GR; Casselman JW; Van Der Sloten J; Mommaerts MY
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 18815053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and medical computed tomography: implications for clinical diagnostics with guided surgery.
Abboud M; Calvo-Guirado JL; Orentlicher G; Wahl G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):536-42. PubMed ID: 23527357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability and the smallest detectable difference of measurements on 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography images.
Damstra J; Fourie Z; Huddleston Slater JJ; Ren Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Sep; 140(3):e107-14. PubMed ID: 21889058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography voxel density and linear distance measurement at different voxel sizes: A study on sheep head cadaver.
Güngör E; Doğan MS
J Dent Sci; 2017 Jun; 12(2):145-150. PubMed ID: 30895040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of scan mode (180°/360°) of the cone beam computed tomography for preoperative dental implant measurements.
Neves FS; Vasconcelos TV; Campos PS; Haiter-Neto F; Freitas DQ
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Feb; 25(2):e155-8. PubMed ID: 23231370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of Intracanal Materials in Vertical Root Fracture Pathway Detection with Cone-beam Computed Tomography.
Dutra KL; Pachêco-Pereira C; Bortoluzzi EA; Flores-Mir C; Lagravère MO; Corrêa M
J Endod; 2017 Jul; 43(7):1170-1175. PubMed ID: 28527853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy and reliability of buccal bone height and thickness measurements from cone-beam computed tomography imaging.
Timock AM; Cook V; McDonald T; Leo MC; Crowe J; Benninger BL; Covell DA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):734-44. PubMed ID: 22051495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The accuracy of linear measurements of maxillary and mandibular edentulous sites in cone-beam computed tomography images with different fields of view and voxel sizes under simulated clinical conditions.
Ganguly R; Ramesh A; Pagni S
Imaging Sci Dent; 2016 Jun; 46(2):93-101. PubMed ID: 27358816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
