267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28361165)
1. Accuracy of stereolithographically printed digital models compared to plaster models.
Camardella LT; Vilella OV; van Hezel MM; Breuning KH
J Orofac Orthop; 2017 Sep; 78(5):394-402. PubMed ID: 28361165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy and reproducibility of measurements on plaster models and digital models created using an intraoral scanner.
Camardella LT; Breuning H; de Vasconcellos Vilella O
J Orofac Orthop; 2017 May; 78(3):211-220. PubMed ID: 28074260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of linear transverse measures between plaster and resin printed digital models.
Manuelli M; Huanca Ghislanzoni L; Farronato M; Martintoni A; Marcolina M; Lucchese A
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents; 2018; 32(2 Suppl. 2):81-85. PubMed ID: 29720334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of printed dental models made with 2 prototype technologies and different designs of model bases.
Camardella LT; de Vasconcellos Vilella O; Breuning H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jun; 151(6):1178-1187. PubMed ID: 28554463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of digital dental models and three-dimensional printed dental models in linear measurements and Bolton analysis.
Suryajaya W; Purbiati M; Ismah N
F1000Res; 2021; 10():180. PubMed ID: 33968366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Validity of Intraoral Scans Compared with Plaster Models: An In-Vivo Comparison of Dental Measurements and 3D Surface Analysis.
Zhang F; Suh KJ; Lee KM
PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0157713. PubMed ID: 27304976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of 3-dimensional printed dental models reconstructed from digital intraoral impressions.
Brown GB; Currier GF; Kadioglu O; Kierl JP
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Nov; 154(5):733-739. PubMed ID: 30384944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of dental measurements between conventional plaster models, digital models obtained by impression scanning and plaster model scanning.
Gül Amuk N; Karsli E; Kurt G
Int Orthod; 2019 Mar; 17(1):151-158. PubMed ID: 30772351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of three-dimensional dental resin models created by fused deposition modeling, stereolithography, and Polyjet prototype technologies: A comparative study.
Rebong RE; Stewart KT; Utreja A; Ghoneima AA
Angle Orthod; 2018 May; 88(3):363-369. PubMed ID: 29509023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability and intra-examiner agreement of orthodontic model analysis with a digital caliper on plaster and printed dental models.
Koretsi V; Kirschbauer C; Proff P; Kirschneck C
Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Aug; 23(8):3387-3396. PubMed ID: 30539294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of polyvinylsiloxane material and impression handling on the accuracy of digital models.
Camardella LT; Alencar DS; Breuning H; de Vasconcellos Vilella O
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 May; 149(5):634-44. PubMed ID: 27131245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy and efficiency of full-arch digitalization and 3D printing: A comparison between desktop model scanners, an intraoral scanner, a CBCT model scan, and stereolithographic 3D printing.
Wesemann C; Muallah J; Mah J; Bumann A
Quintessence Int; 2017; 48(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 27834416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Are there differences between comparison methods used to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of digital models?
Camardella LT; Breuning H; Vilella OV
Dental Press J Orthod; 2017 Feb; 22(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 28444012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions.
Wiranto MG; Engelbrecht WP; Tutein Nolthenius HE; van der Meer WJ; Ren Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jan; 143(1):140-7. PubMed ID: 23273370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Conformity, reliability and validity of digital dental models created by clinical intraoral scanning and extraoral plaster model digitization workflows.
Kirschneck C; Kamuf B; Putsch C; Chhatwani S; Bizhang M; Danesh G
Comput Biol Med; 2018 Sep; 100():114-122. PubMed ID: 29990644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of intraoral scans in the mixed dentition: a prospective non-randomized comparative clinical trial.
Liczmanski K; Stamm T; Sauerland C; Blanck-Lubarsch M
Head Face Med; 2020 May; 16(1):11. PubMed ID: 32430023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing the reliability and accuracy of clinical measurements using plaster model and the digital model system based on crowding severity.
Liang YM; Rutchakitprakarn L; Kuang SH; Wu TY
J Chin Med Assoc; 2018 Sep; 81(9):842-847. PubMed ID: 29395944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measurements using orthodontic analysis software on digital models obtained by 3D scans of plaster casts : Intrarater reliability and validity.
Czarnota J; Hey J; Fuhrmann R
J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jan; 77(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 26753549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the accuracy of digital and 3D-printed casts compared with conventional stone casts.
Ellakany P; Al-Harbi F; El Tantawi M; Mohsen C
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Mar; 127(3):438-444. PubMed ID: 33308856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of Intraoral Digital Impressions for Whole Upper Jaws, Including Full Dentitions and Palatal Soft Tissues.
Gan N; Xiong Y; Jiao T
PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158800. PubMed ID: 27383409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
