These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28362170)

  • 1. Accuracy and reproducibility of dental measurements on tomographic digital models: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ferreira JB; Christovam IO; Alencar DS; da Motta AFJ; Mattos CT; Cury-Saramago A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Oct; 46(7):20160455. PubMed ID: 28362170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Exploring a new method for superimposition of pre-treatment and post-treatment mandibular digital dental casts in adults].
    Dai FF; Liu Y; Xu TM; Chen G
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Apr; 50(2):271-278. PubMed ID: 29643526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of intra-arch and interarch measurements from digital models with 2 impression materials and a modeling process based on cone-beam computed tomography.
    White AJ; Fallis DW; Vandewalle KS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):456.e1-9; discussion 456-7. PubMed ID: 20362900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy and reproducibility of permanent dentitions and dental arch measurements: comparing three different digital models with a plaster study cast.
    Al-Mashraqi AA; Alhammadi MS; Gadi AA; Altharawi RA; Zamim KAH; Halboub E
    Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Dec; 24(4):353-362. PubMed ID: 34931771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic accuracy of impression-free digital models.
    Akyalcin S; Cozad BE; English JD; Colville CD; Laman S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Dec; 144(6):916-22. PubMed ID: 24286915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [A pilot study on the accuracy of digital model reconstructed by cone beam CT].
    Wu JC; Huang JN; Xu XJ
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2010 Oct; 19(5):456-9. PubMed ID: 21161119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Arch-width and perimeter changes in patients with borderline Class I malocclusion treated with extractions or without extractions with air-rotor stripping.
    Germec-Cakan D; Taner TU; Akan S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jun; 137(6):734.e1-7; discussion 734-5. PubMed ID: 20685525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reproducibility and accuracy of linear measurements on dental models derived from cone-beam computed tomography compared with digital dental casts.
    de Waard O; Rangel FA; Fudalej PS; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Breuning KH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Sep; 146(3):328-36. PubMed ID: 25172255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review.
    Fleming PS; Marinho V; Johal A
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2011 Feb; 14(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 21205164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mesiodistal tooth dimensions and anterior and overall Bolton ratios evaluated by cone beam computed tomography.
    Celikoglu M; Nur M; Kilkis D; Sezgin OS; Bayram M
    Aust Orthod J; 2013 Nov; 29(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 24380134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Accuracy and Reproducibility of Linear Measurements Made on CBCT-derived Digital Models.
    Maroua AL; Ajaj M; Hajeer MY
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Apr; 17(4):294-9. PubMed ID: 27340163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Etiologic factors for buccal and palatal maxillary canine impaction: a perspective based on cone-beam computed tomography analyses.
    Yan B; Sun Z; Fields H; Wang L; Luo L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Apr; 143(4):527-34. PubMed ID: 23561415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intra-arch dimensional measurement validity of laser-scanned digital dental models compared with the original plaster models: a systematic review.
    De Luca Canto G; Pachêco-Pereira C; Lagravere MO; Flores-Mir C; Major PW
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 May; 18(2):65-76. PubMed ID: 25677755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions.
    Wiranto MG; Engelbrecht WP; Tutein Nolthenius HE; van der Meer WJ; Ren Y
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jan; 143(1):140-7. PubMed ID: 23273370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts.
    Leifert MF; Leifert MM; Efstratiadis SS; Cangialosi TJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):16.e1-4; discussion 16. PubMed ID: 19577140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy and eligibility of CBCT to digitize dental plaster casts.
    Becker K; Schmücker U; Schwarz F; Drescher D
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 May; 22(4):1817-1823. PubMed ID: 29196949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Monitoring of typodont root movement via crown superimposition of single cone-beam computed tomography and consecutive intraoral scans.
    Lee RJ; Pham J; Choy M; Weissheimer A; Dougherty HL; Sameshima GT; Tong H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):399-409. PubMed ID: 24582031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surface analysis of study models generated from OrthoCAD and cone-beam computed tomography imaging.
    Lightheart KG; English JD; Kau CH; Akyalcin S; Bussa HI; McGrory KR; McGrory KJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jun; 141(6):686-93. PubMed ID: 22640670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Artifact-resistant superimposition of digital dental models and cone-beam computed tomography images.
    Lin HH; Chiang WC; Lo LJ; Sheng-Pin Hsu S; Wang CH; Wan SY
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(11):1933-47. PubMed ID: 23911142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy, reproducibility, and time efficiency of dental measurements using different technologies.
    Grünheid T; Patel N; De Felippe NL; Wey A; Gaillard PR; Larson BE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Feb; 145(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 24485729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.