These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28363344)

  • 1. Development of a multimedia tutorial to educate how to assess the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy using expert review and crowd-sourcing.
    Deal SB; Stefanidis D; Brunt LM; Alseidi A
    Am J Surg; 2017 May; 213(5):988-990. PubMed ID: 28363344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of crowd-sourced assessment of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Deal SB; Stefanidis D; Telem D; Fanelli RD; McDonald M; Ujiki M; Michael Brunt L; Alseidi AA
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Dec; 31(12):5094-5100. PubMed ID: 28444497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Concerns of Quality and Safety in Public Domain Surgical Education Videos: An Assessment of the Critical View of Safety in Frequently Used Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Videos.
    Deal SB; Alseidi AA
    J Am Coll Surg; 2017 Dec; 225(6):725-730. PubMed ID: 28882684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving attainment of the critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Nakazato T; Su B; Novak S; Deal SB; Kuchta K; Ujiki M
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Sep; 34(9):4115-4123. PubMed ID: 31605213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Crowd-sourced assessment of surgical skills in cricothyrotomy procedure.
    Aghdasi N; Bly R; White LW; Hannaford B; Moe K; Lendvay TS
    J Surg Res; 2015 Jun; 196(2):302-6. PubMed ID: 25888499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving Critical View of Safety in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy by Teaching Interventions.
    Nijssen MA; Schreinemakers JM; van der Schelling GP; Crolla RM; Rijken AM
    J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(3):442-7. PubMed ID: 26868305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cut or Do Not Cut? Assessing Perceptions of Safety During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using Surgical Videos.
    Carr BD; Matusko N; Sandhu G; Varban OA
    J Surg Educ; 2018 Nov; 75(6):1583-1588. PubMed ID: 29929815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the effect of the critical view of safety criteria on simulated operative decision-making: a pilot study.
    Niemann AC; Matusko N; Sandhu G; Varban OA
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Mar; 33(3):911-916. PubMed ID: 30167948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lessons Learned from Crowdsourcing Complex Engineering Tasks.
    Staffelbach M; Sempolinski P; Kijewski-Correa T; Thain D; Wei D; Kareem A; Madey G
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0134978. PubMed ID: 26383029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Crowd-sourced assessment of technical skills: an opportunity for improvement in the assessment of laparoscopic surgical skills.
    Deal SB; Lendvay TS; Haque MI; Brand T; Comstock B; Warren J; Alseidi A
    Am J Surg; 2016 Feb; 211(2):398-404. PubMed ID: 26709011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validity and reliability of global operative assessment of laparoscopic skills (GOALS) in novice trainees performing a laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Kramp KH; van Det MJ; Hoff C; Lamme B; Veeger NJ; Pierie JP
    J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(2):351-8. PubMed ID: 25441259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as standardised teaching operation to treat symptomatic cholecystolithiasis].
    Niwa UC; Axt S; Falch C; Müller S; Kreuzer JA; Nedela P; Kirschniak A
    Zentralbl Chir; 2013 Apr; 138(2):141-2. PubMed ID: 23564548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Universal safe procedure of laparoscopic cholecystectomy standardized by exposing the inner layer of the subserosal layer (with video).
    Honda G; Hasegawa H; Umezawa A
    J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2016 Sep; 23(9):E14-9. PubMed ID: 27515579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Direct Observation versus Endoscopic Video Recording-Based Rating with the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills for Training of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.
    Nickel F; Hendrie JD; Stock C; Salama M; Preukschas AA; Senft JD; Kowalewski KF; Wagner M; Kenngott HG; Linke GR; Fischer L; Müller-Stich BP
    Eur Surg Res; 2016; 57(1-2):1-9. PubMed ID: 27058392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Crowdsourcing Evaluation of Ureteroscopic Videos Using the Post-Ureteroscopic Lesion Scale to Assess Ureteral Injury.
    Kaler KS; Valley ZA; Bettir KC; Safiullah SM; Lama D; Yoon R; Landman J; Clayman RV
    J Endourol; 2018 Apr; 32(4):275-281. PubMed ID: 29212372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy is optimized by exposing the inner layer of the subserosal layer.
    Honda G; Iwanaga T; Kurata M; Watanabe F; Satoh H; Iwasaki K
    J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg; 2009; 16(4):445-9. PubMed ID: 19259610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Anatomical orientation and cross-checking-the key to safer laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Diamond T; Mole DJ
    Br J Surg; 2005 Jun; 92(6):663-4. PubMed ID: 15912491
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: towards a national consensus.
    O'Kelly JA; De Marchi JA; Joyce WP
    Ir Med J; 2015 Jan; 108(1):26. PubMed ID: 25702354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Evaluation of technical skills in surgical training].
    Kasparian AC; Martinez AC; JoverClos RJ; Chércoles RA
    Rev Fac Cien Med Univ Nac Cordoba; 2014; 71(3):97-104. PubMed ID: 25647551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A tutorial on capturing mental representations through drawing and crowd-sourced scoring.
    Bainbridge WA
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Apr; 54(2):663-675. PubMed ID: 34341961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.