33 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28364178)
1. Optimizing quality of digital mammographic imaging using Taguchi analysis with an ACR accreditation phantom.
Chen CY; Pan LF; Chiang FT; Yeh DM; Pan LK
Bioengineered; 2016 Jul; 7(4):226-34. PubMed ID: 27282343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dataset for Automatic Region-based Coronary Artery Disease Diagnostics Using X-Ray Angiography Images.
Popov M; Amanturdieva A; Zhaksylyk N; Alkanov A; Saniyazbekov A; Aimyshev T; Ismailov E; Bulegenov A; Kuzhukeyev A; Kulanbayeva A; Kalzhanov A; Temenov N; Kolesnikov A; Sakhov O; Fazli S
Sci Data; 2024 Jan; 11(1):20. PubMed ID: 38172163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. "Reverse Spider View" for left stem coronary artery angiographic evaluation.
Rigatelli G; Gianese F; Zuin M; Rodino' G; Marchese G; Pasquetto G
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 36511241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Prerequisites for Cardiac Imaging Tests: Validation, Validation, Validation.
Hecht HS; Narula J
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2023 Dec; 16(12):1565-1566. PubMed ID: 37589605
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimizing cardiac CT angiography minimum detectable difference via Taguchi's dynamic algorithm, a V-shaped line gauge, and three PMMA phantoms.
Pan LF; Chen YH; Wang CC; Peng BR; Kittipayak S; Pan LK
Technol Health Care; 2022; 30(S1):91-103. PubMed ID: 35124587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cardiovascular imaging 2017 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.
Reiber JHC; Alaiti A; Bezerra HG; De Sutter J; Schoenhagen P; Stillman AE; Van de Veire NRL
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Jun; 34(6):833-848. PubMed ID: 29651658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Plaque assessment by coronary CT.
Szilveszter B; Celeng C; Maurovich-Horvat P
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jan; 32(1):161-72. PubMed ID: 26280890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimizing left anterior oblique (LAO) caudal imaging in coronary angiography using the Taguchi method: A phantom study with clinical verification.
Pan LF; Chu KH; Sher HF; Pan LK
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Sep; 33(9):1287-1295. PubMed ID: 28364178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vivo assessment of bifurcation optimal viewing angles and bifurcation angles by three-dimensional (3D) quantitative coronary angiography.
Tu S; Jing J; Holm NR; Onsea K; Zhang T; Adriaenssens T; Dubois C; Desmet W; Thuesen L; Chen Y; Reiber JH
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Oct; 28(7):1617-25. PubMed ID: 22169957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measurement of coronary bifurcation angle with coronary CT angiography: A phantom study.
Givehchi S; Safari MJ; Tan SK; Md Shah MNB; Sani FBM; Azman RR; Sun Z; Yeong CH; Ng KH; Wong JHD
Phys Med; 2018 Jan; 45():198-204. PubMed ID: 29373248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Coronary stent imaging with dual-source CT: assessment of lumen visibility using different convolution kernels and postprocessing filters.
Ulrich A; Burg MC; Raupach R; Bunck A; Schuelke C; Maintz D; Heindel W; Seifarth H
Acta Radiol; 2015 Jan; 56(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 24399513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dose optimization in pediatric cardiac x-ray imaging.
Gislason AJ; Davies AG; Cowen AR
Med Phys; 2010 Oct; 37(10):5258-69. PubMed ID: 21089760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch coronary angiography with third-generation dual-source CT at 70 kVp tube voltage: feasibility, image quality, radiation dose, and effect of iterative reconstruction.
Hell MM; Bittner D; Schuhbaeck A; Muschiol G; Brand M; Lell M; Uder M; Achenbach S; Marwan M
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2014; 8(6):418-25. PubMed ID: 25439789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the occupational X-rays dose of the medical staff in a cardiac catheterization laboratory using an acrylic phantom and semiconductor dosimeter.
Pan LF; Kittipayak S; Yen SL; Pan LK; Lin CH
Hell J Nucl Med; 2016; 19(2):140-6. PubMed ID: 27331208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
