These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28364367)

  • 1. Effects of task-irrelevant grouping on visual selection in partial report.
    Lunau R; Habekost T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jul; 79(5):1323-1335. PubMed ID: 28364367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Irrelevant reward and selection histories have different influences on task-relevant attentional selection.
    MacLean MH; Giesbrecht B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jul; 77(5):1515-28. PubMed ID: 25813737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gestalt grouping cues can improve filtering performance in visual working memory.
    Allon AS; Vixman G; Luria R
    Psychol Res; 2019 Nov; 83(8):1656-1672. PubMed ID: 29845437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual training improves perceptual grouping based on basic stimulus features.
    Kurylo DD; Waxman R; Kidron R; Silverstein SM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Oct; 79(7):2098-2107. PubMed ID: 28681180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The fate of task-irrelevant visual motion: perceptual load versus feature-based attention.
    Taya S; Adams WJ; Graf EW; Lavie N
    J Vis; 2009 Nov; 9(12):12.1-10. PubMed ID: 20053103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interaction between object-based attention and pertinence values shapes the attentional priority map of a multielement display.
    Gillebert CR; Petersen A; Van Meel C; Müller T; McIntyre A; Wagemans J; Humphreys GW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jun; 42(6):866-877. PubMed ID: 26752732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does partial difficult search help difficult search?
    Olds ES; Degani MD
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Feb; 65(2):238-53. PubMed ID: 12713241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of the irrelevant: the task environment modulates the impact of irrelevant features in response selection.
    Mast F; Frings C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Dec; 40(6):2198-213. PubMed ID: 25328998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Qualitative differences in the guidance of attention during single-color and multiple-color visual search: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Grubert A; Eimer M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Oct; 39(5):1433-42. PubMed ID: 23244044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of task set-modulating attentional capture depends on the distractor cost in visual search: evidence from N2pc.
    Zhao D; Liang S; Jin Z; Li L
    Neuroreport; 2014 Jul; 25(10):737-42. PubMed ID: 24840929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Feature-based attention is not confined by object boundaries: Spatially global enhancement of irrelevant features.
    Chapman AF; Störmer VS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Aug; 28(4):1252-1260. PubMed ID: 33687666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Feature-based attention warps the perception of visual features.
    Chapman AF; Chunharas C; Störmer VS
    Sci Rep; 2023 Apr; 13(1):6487. PubMed ID: 37081047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What underlies visual selective attention development? Evidence that age-related improvements in visual feature integration influence visual selective attention performance.
    Lynn A; Festa EK; Heindel WC; Amso D
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2020 Mar; 191():104732. PubMed ID: 31770683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.
    Kumada T
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Alertness and cognitive control: Toward a spatial grouping hypothesis.
    Schneider DW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 May; 80(4):913-928. PubMed ID: 29468495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Grouping effects on spatial attention in visual search.
    Kim MS; Cave KR
    J Gen Psychol; 1999 Oct; 126(4):326-52. PubMed ID: 10555864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identifying bottom-up and top-down components of attentional weight by experimental analysis and computational modeling.
    Nordfang M; Dyrholm M; Bundesen C
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 May; 142(2):510-35. PubMed ID: 22889161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual selective attention among persons with schizophrenia: the distractor ratio effect.
    Elahipanah A; Christensen BK; Reingold EM
    Schizophr Res; 2008 Oct; 105(1-3):61-7. PubMed ID: 18579345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. All set, indeed! N2pc components reveal simultaneous attentional control settings for multiple target colors.
    Grubert A; Eimer M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1215-30. PubMed ID: 26950386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptual grouping enhances visual plasticity.
    Mastropasqua T; Turatto M
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e53683. PubMed ID: 23301100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.