263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28364387)
1. Patients' Preferences for Outcome, Process and Cost Attributes in Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments.
Bien DR; Danner M; Vennedey V; Civello D; Evers SM; Hiligsmann M
Patient; 2017 Oct; 10(5):553-565. PubMed ID: 28364387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patients' preferences for the treatment of anxiety and depressive disorders: a systematic review of discrete choice experiments.
Tünneßen M; Hiligsmann M; Stock S; Vennedey V
J Med Econ; 2020 Jun; 23(6):546-556. PubMed ID: 32011209
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Patients' preferences for primary health care - a systematic literature review of discrete choice experiments.
Kleij KS; Tangermann U; Amelung VE; Krauth C
BMC Health Serv Res; 2017 Jul; 17(1):476. PubMed ID: 28697796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patient Preferences in Targeted Pharmacotherapy for Cancers: A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments.
Jiang S; Ren R; Gu Y; Jeet V; Liu P; Li S
Pharmacoeconomics; 2023 Jan; 41(1):43-57. PubMed ID: 36372823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk as an attribute in discrete choice experiments: a systematic review of the literature.
Harrison M; Rigby D; Vass C; Flynn T; Louviere J; Payne K
Patient; 2014; 7(2):151-70. PubMed ID: 24566923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vaccine preferences driving vaccine-decision making of different target groups: a systematic review of choice-based experiments.
Diks ME; Hiligsmann M; van der Putten IM
BMC Infect Dis; 2021 Aug; 21(1):879. PubMed ID: 34454441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments and Conjoint Analysis on Genetic Testing.
Ozdemir S; Lee JJ; Chaudhry I; Ocampo RRQ
Patient; 2022 Jan; 15(1):39-54. PubMed ID: 34085205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stakeholders' preferences for the design and delivery of virtual care services: A systematic review of discrete choice experiments.
Vo LK; Allen MJ; Cunich M; Thillainadesan J; McPhail SM; Sharma P; Wallis S; McGowan K; Carter HE
Soc Sci Med; 2024 Jan; 340():116459. PubMed ID: 38048738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Women's preferences for attributes of first-trimester miscarriage management: a stated preference discrete-choice experiment.
Petrou S; McIntosh E
Value Health; 2009 Jun; 12(4):551-9. PubMed ID: 18798807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Attributes Used for Cancer Screening Discrete Choice Experiments: A Systematic Review.
Hall R; Medina-Lara A; Hamilton W; Spencer AE
Patient; 2022 May; 15(3):269-285. PubMed ID: 34671946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing Discrete Choice Experiment with Swing Weighting to Estimate Attribute Relative Importance: A Case Study in Lung Cancer Patient Preferences.
Veldwijk J; Smith IP; Oliveri S; Petrocchi S; Smith MY; Lanzoni L; Janssens R; Huys I; de Wit GA; Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM
Med Decis Making; 2024 Feb; 44(2):203-216. PubMed ID: 38178591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The importance of understanding patient and physician preferences for psoriasis treatment characteristics: a systematic review of discrete-choice experiments.
Sain N; Willems D; Charokopou M; Hiligsmann M
Curr Med Res Opin; 2020 Aug; 36(8):1257-1275. PubMed ID: 32468865
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of physicians' perspectives versus patients' preferences: direct assessment and discrete choice experiments in the therapy of multiple myeloma.
Mühlbacher AC; Nübling M
Eur J Health Econ; 2011 Jun; 12(3):193-203. PubMed ID: 20107856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does the inclusion of a cost attribute result in different preferences for the surgical treatment of primary basal cell carcinoma?: a comparison of two discrete-choice experiments.
Essers BA; van Helvoort-Postulart D; Prins MH; Neumann M; Dirksen CD
Pharmacoeconomics; 2010; 28(6):507-20. PubMed ID: 20387912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do patients and health care providers have discordant preferences about which aspects of treatments matter most? Evidence from a systematic review of discrete choice experiments.
Harrison M; Milbers K; Hudson M; Bansback N
BMJ Open; 2017 May; 7(5):e014719. PubMed ID: 28515194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Attributes in stated preference elicitation studies on colorectal cancer screening and their relative importance for decision-making among screenees: a systematic review.
Brinkmann M; Fricke LM; Diedrich L; Robra BP; Krauth C; Dreier M
Health Econ Rev; 2022 Sep; 12(1):49. PubMed ID: 36136248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Systematic and Critical Review of Discrete Choice Experiments in Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
Collacott H; Zhang D; Heidenreich S; Tervonen T
Patient; 2022 Jan; 15(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 34250574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient preferences for epilepsy treatment: a systematic review of discrete choice experimental studies.
Al-Aqeel S; Alotaiwi R; Albugami B
Health Econ Rev; 2023 Mar; 13(1):17. PubMed ID: 36933108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Systematic Review of Discrete-Choice Experiments and Conjoint Analysis Studies in People with Multiple Sclerosis.
Webb EJD; Meads D; Eskyte I; King N; Dracup N; Chataway J; Ford HL; Marti J; Pavitt SH; Schmierer K; Manzano A
Patient; 2018 Aug; 11(4):391-402. PubMed ID: 29313265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient preferences for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a scoping review.
Joy SM; Little E; Maruthur NM; Purnell TS; Bridges JF
Pharmacoeconomics; 2013 Oct; 31(10):877-92. PubMed ID: 24081453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
