263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28364387)
21. Patient choice in colorectal cancer treatment - A systematic review and narrative synthesis of attribute-based stated preference studies.
Kowal M; Douglas F; Jayne D; Meads D
Colorectal Dis; 2022 Nov; 24(11):1295-1307. PubMed ID: 35776854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments in Oncology Treatments.
Collacott H; Soekhai V; Thomas C; Brooks A; Brookes E; Lo R; Mulnick S; Heidenreich S
Patient; 2021 Nov; 14(6):775-790. PubMed ID: 33950476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Development of attributes and attribute levels for a discrete choice experiment on patients' and providers' choice for antiretroviral therapy service in Northwest Ethiopia.
Belay YA; Yitayal M; Atnafu A; Taye FA
AIDS Res Ther; 2023 Jun; 20(1):33. PubMed ID: 37271808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Survival or Mortality: Does Risk Attribute Framing Influence Decision-Making Behavior in a Discrete Choice Experiment?
Veldwijk J; Essers BA; Lambooij MS; Dirksen CD; Smit HA; de Wit GA
Value Health; 2016; 19(2):202-9. PubMed ID: 27021754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A Study of Patient Preferences for the Treatment of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in Western China: A Discrete-Choice Experiment.
Liu F; Hu H; Wang J; Chen Y; Hui S; Hu M
Front Public Health; 2021; 9():653450. PubMed ID: 33842426
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Patient preferences in the treatment of chronic musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review of discrete choice experiments.
Zhu M; Dong D; Lo HH; Wong SY; Mo PK; Sit RW
Pain; 2023 Apr; 164(4):675-689. PubMed ID: 36149784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Methods to Summarize Discrete-Choice Experiments in a Systematic Review: A Scoping Review.
Choudhary D; Thomas M; Pacheco-Barrios K; Zhang Y; Alonso-Coello P; Schünemann H; Hazlewood G
Patient; 2022 Nov; 15(6):629-639. PubMed ID: 35829927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Driving factors in treatment decision-making of patients seeking medical assistance for infertility: a systematic review.
von Estorff F; Mochtar MH; Lehmann V; van Wely M
Hum Reprod Update; 2024 May; 30(3):341-354. PubMed ID: 38305635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Patient Preferences for Features of Health Care Delivery Systems: A Discrete Choice Experiment.
Mühlbacher AC; Bethge S; Reed SD; Schulman KA
Health Serv Res; 2016 Apr; 51(2):704-27. PubMed ID: 26255998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparing Analytic Hierarchy Process and Discrete-Choice Experiment to Elicit Patient Preferences for Treatment Characteristics in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.
Danner M; Vennedey V; Hiligsmann M; Fauser S; Gross C; Stock S
Value Health; 2017 Sep; 20(8):1166-1173. PubMed ID: 28964450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Parent, provider and vaccinee preferences for HPV vaccination: A systematic review of discrete choice experiments.
Lack A; Hiligsmann M; Bloem P; Tünneßen M; Hutubessy R
Vaccine; 2020 Oct; 38(46):7226-7238. PubMed ID: 33023774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Individual Value Clarification Methods Based on Conjoint Analysis: A Systematic Review of Common Practice in Task Design, Statistical Analysis, and Presentation of Results.
Weernink MGM; van Til JA; Witteman HO; Fraenkel L; IJzerman MJ
Med Decis Making; 2018 Aug; 38(6):746-755. PubMed ID: 29592585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A discrete choice experiment to assess patients' preferences for HIV treatment in the urban population in Colombia.
Sijstermans E; Cheung KL; Goossens AJM; Conde R; Gonzalez JGR; Hiligsmann M
J Med Econ; 2020 Aug; 23(8):812-818. PubMed ID: 32098614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Assessing the impact of excluded attributes on choice in a discrete choice experiment using a follow-up question.
Mansfield C; Sutphin J; Boeri M
Health Econ; 2020 Oct; 29(10):1307-1315. PubMed ID: 32627284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Preferences for antiviral therapy of chronic hepatitis C: a discrete choice experiment.
Mühlbacher AC; Bridges JF; Bethge S; Dintsios CM; Schwalm A; Gerber-Grote A; Nübling M
Eur J Health Econ; 2017 Mar; 18(2):155-165. PubMed ID: 26846922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Reporting Quality of Marginal Rates of Substitution in Discrete Choice Experiments That Elicit Patient Preferences.
Mott DJ; Chami N; Tervonen T
Value Health; 2020 Aug; 23(8):979-984. PubMed ID: 32828225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Discrete choice experiments to generate utility values for multi-attribute utility instruments: a systematic review of methods.
Bahrampour M; Byrnes J; Norman R; Scuffham PA; Downes M
Eur J Health Econ; 2020 Sep; 21(7):983-992. PubMed ID: 32367379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Simulation study to determine the impact of different design features on design efficiency in discrete choice experiments.
Vanniyasingam T; Cunningham CE; Foster G; Thabane L
BMJ Open; 2016 Jul; 6(7):e011985. PubMed ID: 27436671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Differences between physician and patient preferences for cancer treatments: a systematic review.
Zhang M; He X; Wu J; Xie F
BMC Cancer; 2023 Nov; 23(1):1126. PubMed ID: 37980466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Mental health service preferences of patients and providers: a scoping review of conjoint analysis and discrete choice experiments from global public health literature over the last 20 years (1999-2019).
Larsen A; Tele A; Kumar M
BMC Health Serv Res; 2021 Jun; 21(1):589. PubMed ID: 34144685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
