These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28365315)

  • 1. Response inhibition or evaluation of danger? An event-related potential study regarding the origin of the motor interference effect from dangerous objects.
    Liu P; Cao R; Chen X; Wang Y
    Brain Res; 2017 Jun; 1664():63-73. PubMed ID: 28365315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Time-frequency analysis of event-related potentials associated with the origin of the motor interference effect from dangerous objects.
    Liu P
    Brain Res; 2018 Mar; 1682():44-53. PubMed ID: 29317288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A sequential trial effect based on the motor interference effect from dangerous objects: An ERP study.
    Liu P; Wang X; Cao G; Li J; Zhang J; Cao R
    Brain Behav; 2018 Oct; 8(10):e01112. PubMed ID: 30176195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Increasing Perceptual Salience Diminishes the Motor Interference Effect From Dangerous Objects.
    Cao R; Cao G; Liu P
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():580. PubMed ID: 32292380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Movement-related potentials in the Go/NoGo task: the P3 reflects both cognitive and motor inhibition.
    Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Mar; 119(3):704-714. PubMed ID: 18164657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative analysis of event-related potentials during Go/NoGo and CPT: decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention.
    Kirmizi-Alsan E; Bayraktaroglu Z; Gurvit H; Keskin YH; Emre M; Demiralp T
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1104(1):114-28. PubMed ID: 16824492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of age on cognitive control during semantic categorization.
    Mudar RA; Chiang HS; Maguire MJ; Spence JS; Eroh J; Kraut MA; Hart J
    Behav Brain Res; 2015; 287():285-93. PubMed ID: 25823764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Motor inhibition impacts the motor interference effect of dangerous objects based on a prime-target grasping consistency judgment task.
    Liu P; Zheng J; Wang Y; Chen L; Lin L; Wang Y
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2023 Nov; 193():112248. PubMed ID: 37778535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sequential processing in the equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task: children vs. adults.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM; Borchard JP
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 Oct; 125(10):1995-2006. PubMed ID: 24661623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrophysiological correlates of behavioral response inhibition in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder.
    Kim MS; Kim YY; Yoo SY; Kwon JS
    Depress Anxiety; 2007; 24(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 16933318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. CNV resolution does not cause NoGo anteriorisation of the P3: a failure to replicate Simson et al.
    Smith JL; Barry RJ; Steiner GZ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Sep; 89(3):349-57. PubMed ID: 23669175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The relationship between ERP components and EEG spatial complexity in a visual Go/Nogo task.
    Jia H; Li H; Yu D
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Jan; 117(1):275-283. PubMed ID: 27784803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A study on the neural mechanism of inhibition of return by the event-related potential in the Go/NoGo task.
    Tian Y; Yao D
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Oct; 79(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 18524452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A combined forced-attention dichotic listening - Go/Nogo task to assess response inhibition and interference suppression: An auditory event-related potential investigation.
    Bedoin N; Abadie R; Krzonowski J; Ferragne E; Marcastel A
    Neuropsychology; 2019 Nov; 33(8):1136-1150. PubMed ID: 31380670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Response priming in the Go/NoGo task: the N2 reflects neither inhibition nor conflict.
    Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Feb; 118(2):343-55. PubMed ID: 17140848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of pre-stimulus processing on subsequent events in a warned Go/NoGo paradigm: response preparation, execution and inhibition.
    Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):121-33. PubMed ID: 16214250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Arousal modulates the motor interference effect stimulated by pictures of threatening animals.
    Cao G; Liu P
    PeerJ; 2021; 9():e10876. PubMed ID: 33614293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Response competition and response inhibition during different choice-discrimination tasks: evidence from ERP measured inside MRI scanner.
    Gonzalez-Rosa JJ; Inuggi A; Blasi V; Cursi M; Annovazzi P; Comi G; Falini A; Leocani L
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 23664841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. N2 and P3 modulation during partial inhibition in a modified go/nogo task.
    Nguyen AT; Moyle JJ; Fox AM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Sep; 107():63-71. PubMed ID: 27394185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diversity of the P3 in the task-switching paradigm.
    Gajewski PD; Falkenstein M
    Brain Res; 2011 Sep; 1411():87-97. PubMed ID: 21803343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.