These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28365315)

  • 21. Electrophysiological underpinnings of response variability in the Go/NoGo task.
    Karamacoska D; Barry RJ; Steiner GZ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Dec; 134():159-167. PubMed ID: 30266622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Prestimulus alpha and beta determinants of ERP responses in the Go/NoGo task.
    De Blasio FM; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 23643562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of task complexity on ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks.
    Gajewski PD; Falkenstein M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 22906814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Response inhibition is more effortful than response activation: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Gao H; Qi M; Zhang Q
    Neuroreport; 2017 May; 28(7):404-407. PubMed ID: 28272263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sequential processing in the equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task: a temporal PCA study.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):123-7. PubMed ID: 23792217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Binge drinking affects brain oscillations linked to motor inhibition and execution.
    López-Caneda E; Rodríguez Holguín S; Correas Á; Carbia C; González-Villar A; Maestú F; Cadaveira F
    J Psychopharmacol; 2017 Jul; 31(7):873-882. PubMed ID: 28168896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Go and no-go P3 with rare and frequent stimuli in oddball tasks: A study comparing key-pressing with counting.
    Verleger R; Grauhan N; Śmigasiewicz K
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Dec; 110():128-136. PubMed ID: 27845155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Response inhibition and interference control in children with AD/HD: a visual ERP investigation.
    Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ; Markovska V; Dimoska A; Clarke AR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 May; 72(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 19095016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Time course of automatic emotion regulation during a facial Go/Nogo task.
    Zhang W; Lu J
    Biol Psychol; 2012 Feb; 89(2):444-9. PubMed ID: 22200654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reduced Nogo-P3 in adults with developmental coordination disorder (DCD).
    Suzuki K; Kita Y; Shirakawa Y; Egashira Y; Mitsuhashi S; Kitamura Y; Okuzumi H; Kaga Y; Inagaki M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2020 Jul; 153():37-44. PubMed ID: 32302648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sequence effects support the conflict theory of N2 and P3 in the Go/NoGo task.
    Smith JL; Smith EA; Provost AL; Heathcote A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Mar; 75(3):217-26. PubMed ID: 19951723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Varying task difficulty in the Go/Nogo task: the effects of inhibitory control, arousal, and perceived effort on ERP components.
    Benikos N; Johnstone SJ; Roodenrys SJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):262-72. PubMed ID: 22902315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Spatiotemporal characterization of response inhibition.
    Albert J; López-Martín S; Hinojosa JA; Carretié L
    Neuroimage; 2013 Aug; 76():272-81. PubMed ID: 23523776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of age on N2 and P3 components: A meta-analysis of Go/Nogo tasks.
    Cheng CH; Tsai HY; Cheng HN
    Brain Cogn; 2019 Oct; 135():103574. PubMed ID: 31200173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A processing schema for children in the auditory equiprobable Go/NoGo task: ERP components and behaviour.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM; Fogarty JS
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Jan; 123():74-79. PubMed ID: 29122654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effects of fetal alcohol syndrome on response execution and inhibition: an event-related potential study.
    Burden MJ; Andrew C; Saint-Amour D; Meintjes EM; Molteno CD; Hoyme HE; Robinson LK; Khaole N; Nelson CA; Jacobson JL; Jacobson SW
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2009 Nov; 33(11):1994-2004. PubMed ID: 19719791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Disentangling specific inhibitory versus general decision-making processes during sleep deprivation using a Go/NoGo ERP paradigm.
    Gosselin A; De Koninck J; Campbell KB
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Jul; 141():18-27. PubMed ID: 31022412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sequence effects in the Go/NoGo task: inhibition and facilitation.
    Thomas SJ; Gonsalvez CJ; Johnstone SJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Dec; 74(3):209-19. PubMed ID: 19751776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Executive control in obsessive-compulsive disorder: event-related potentials in a Go/Nogo task.
    Ruchsow M; Reuter K; Hermle L; Ebert D; Kiefer M; Falkenstein M
    J Neural Transm (Vienna); 2007; 114(12):1595-601. PubMed ID: 17610122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The detrimental effect of acute stress on response inhibition when exposed to acute stress: an event-related potential analysis.
    Jiang C; Rau PP
    Neuroreport; 2017 Sep; 28(14):922-928. PubMed ID: 28777259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.