These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28365376)

  • 1. In search of oculomotor capture during film viewing: Implications for the balance of top-down and bottom-up control in the saccadic system.
    Hinde SJ; Smith TJ; Gilchrist ID
    Vision Res; 2017 May; 134():7-17. PubMed ID: 28365376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characteristics of covert and overt visual orienting: Evidence from attentional and oculomotor capture.
    Wu SC; Remington RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):1050-67. PubMed ID: 14585022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Early top-down control over saccadic target selection: Evidence from a systematic salience difference manipulation.
    Goschy H; Koch AI; Müller HJ; Zehetleitner M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Feb; 76(2):367-82. PubMed ID: 24323673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evidence for a dissociation between the control of oculomotor capture and disengagement.
    Born S; Kerzel D; Theeuwes J
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Feb; 208(4):621-31. PubMed ID: 21188362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pre-stimulus activity predicts the winner of top-down vs. bottom-up attentional selection.
    Mazaheri A; DiQuattro NE; Bengson J; Geng JJ
    PLoS One; 2011 Feb; 6(2):e16243. PubMed ID: 21386896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Saccadic context indicates information processing within visual fixations: evidence from event-related potentials and eye-movements analysis of the distractor effect.
    Graupner ST; Pannasch S; Velichkovsky BM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Apr; 80(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 21291920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attentional and oculomotor capture by onset, luminance and color singletons.
    Irwin DE; Colcombe AM; Kramer AF; Hahn S
    Vision Res; 2000; 40(10-12):1443-58. PubMed ID: 10788651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Goal-driven modulation of oculomotor capture.
    Ludwig CJ; Gilchrist ID
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Nov; 65(8):1243-51. PubMed ID: 14710959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of bilateral versus unilateral target and distractor presentation in the remote distractor paradigm.
    Benson V
    Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(5):334-41. PubMed ID: 25116301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inhibition-of-return and oculomotor interference.
    Theeuwes J; Godijn R
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1485-92. PubMed ID: 15066406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Capture of the eyes by relevant and irrelevant onsets.
    Mulckhuyse M; van Zoest W; Theeuwes J
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Mar; 186(2):225-35. PubMed ID: 18057925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The remote distractor effect of saccade latencies in fixation-offset and overlap conditions.
    Honda H
    Vision Res; 2005 Oct; 45(21):2773-9. PubMed ID: 16051305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Saccades and microsaccades during visual fixation, exploration, and search: foundations for a common saccadic generator.
    Otero-Millan J; Troncoso XG; Macknik SL; Serrano-Pedraza I; Martinez-Conde S
    J Vis; 2008 Dec; 8(14):21.1-18. PubMed ID: 19146322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can intertrial priming account for the similarity effect in visual search?
    Becker SI; Ansorge U; Horstmann G
    Vision Res; 2009 Jul; 49(14):1738-56. PubMed ID: 19358862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Habituation of oculomotor capture by sudden onsets: Stimulus specificity, spontaneous recovery and dishabituation.
    Bonetti F; Turatto M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Feb; 45(2):264-284. PubMed ID: 30570321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improved top-down control reduces oculomotor capture: the case of action video game players.
    Chisholm JD; Kingstone A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Feb; 74(2):257-62. PubMed ID: 22160821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surprise, surprise: two distinct components in the visually evoked distractor effect.
    Graupner ST; Velichkovsky BM; Pannasch S; Marx J
    Psychophysiology; 2007 Mar; 44(2):251-61. PubMed ID: 17343709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Competitive integration of visual and goal-related signals on neuronal accumulation rate: a correlate of oculomotor capture in the superior colliculus.
    White BJ; Marino RA; Boehnke SE; Itti L; Theeuwes J; Munoz DP
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2013 Oct; 25(10):1754-68. PubMed ID: 23691982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dissociated effects of distractors on saccades and manual aiming.
    McIntosh RD; Buonocore A
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Aug; 220(3-4):201-11. PubMed ID: 22684944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Conditioned fear modulates visual selection.
    Mulckhuyse M; Crombez G; Van der Stigchel S
    Emotion; 2013 Jun; 13(3):529-36. PubMed ID: 23356561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.