BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28365784)

  • 21. Paradoxical uptake of Gd-EOB-DTPA on the hepatobiliary phase in the evaluation of hepatic metastasis from breast cancer: is the "target sign" a common finding?
    Ha S; Lee CH; Kim BH; Park YS; Lee J; Choi JW; Kim KA; Park CM
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Oct; 30(8):1083-90. PubMed ID: 22578929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Different signal intensity at Gd-EOB-DTPA compared with Gd-DTPA-enhanced MRI in hepatocellular carcinoma transgenic mouse model in delayed phase hepatobiliary imaging.
    Korkusuz H; Knau LL; Kromen W; Bihrer V; Keese D; Piiper A; Vogl TJ
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Jun; 35(6):1397-402. PubMed ID: 22267126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Contrast-enhanced multiple-phase imaging features in hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma.
    Chen Y; Yu RS; Qiu LL; Jiang DY; Tan YB; Fu YB
    World J Gastroenterol; 2011 Aug; 17(30):3544-53. PubMed ID: 21941423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Detection and characterization of focal liver lesions: a Japanese phase III, multicenter comparison between gadoxetic acid disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and contrast-enhanced computed tomography predominantly in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and chronic liver disease.
    Ichikawa T; Saito K; Yoshioka N; Tanimoto A; Gokan T; Takehara Y; Kamura T; Gabata T; Murakami T; Ito K; Hirohashi S; Nishie A; Saito Y; Onaya H; Kuwatsuru R; Morimoto A; Ueda K; Kurauchi M; Breuer J
    Invest Radiol; 2010 Mar; 45(3):133-41. PubMed ID: 20098330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Coefficient of variation on Gd-EOB MR imaging: Correlation with the presence of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis B.
    Lee JH; Kim YR; Lee GM; Ryu JH; Cho EY; Lee YH; Yoon KH
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 May; 102():95-101. PubMed ID: 29685552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. CT and MRI diagnosis of hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma.
    Lin J; Ji Y
    Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2010 Apr; 9(2):154-8. PubMed ID: 20382586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI of the liver: correlation of relative hepatic enhancement, relative renal enhancement, and liver to kidneys enhancement ratio with serum hepatic enzyme levels and eGFR.
    Talakic E; Steiner J; Kalmar P; Lutfi A; Quehenberger F; Reiter U; Fuchsjäger M; Schöllnast H
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Apr; 83(4):607-11. PubMed ID: 24380639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Hepatic hemangiomas: difference in enhancement pattern on 3T MR imaging with gadobenate dimeglumine versus gadoxetate disodium.
    Gupta RT; Marin D; Boll DT; Husarik DB; Davis DE; Feuerlein S; Merkle EM
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Oct; 81(10):2457-62. PubMed ID: 22138122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography with Gd-BOPTA and Gd-EOB-DTPA in healthy subjects.
    Dahlström N; Persson A; Albiin N; Smedby O; Brismar TB
    Acta Radiol; 2007 May; 48(4):362-8. PubMed ID: 17453513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Contrast enhanced liver MRI in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis: inverse appearance of focal confluent fibrosis on delayed phase MR images with hepatocyte specific versus extracellular gadolinium based contrast agents.
    Husarik DB; Gupta RT; Ringe KI; Boll DT; Merkle EM
    Acad Radiol; 2011 Dec; 18(12):1549-54. PubMed ID: 21958599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: differentiation between focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatocellular adenoma].
    Portilha MA; Pedro MT; Ruivo C; Semedo LC; Marques C; Alves FC
    Acta Med Port; 2011 Dec; 24 Suppl 2():531-8. PubMed ID: 22849944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Impaired hepatic Gd-EOB-DTPA enhancement after radioembolisation of liver malignancies.
    Powerski MJ; Scheurig-Münkler C; Hamm B; Gebauer B
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2014 Aug; 58(4):472-80. PubMed ID: 24964737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Value of retrospective fusion of PET and MR images in detection of hepatic metastases: comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI.
    Donati OF; Hany TF; Reiner CS; von Schulthess GK; Marincek B; Seifert B; Weishaupt D
    J Nucl Med; 2010 May; 51(5):692-9. PubMed ID: 20395324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Uptake of Gd-EOB-DTPA by hepatocellular carcinoma: radiologic-pathologic correlation with special reference to bile production.
    Asayama Y; Tajima T; Nishie A; Ishigami K; Kakihara D; Nakayama T; Okamoto D; Fujita N; Aishima S; Shirabe K; Honda H
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Dec; 80(3):e243-8. PubMed ID: 21109378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Inter-observer agreement on the assessment of relative liver lesion signal intensity on hepatobiliary phase imaging with gadoxetate (Gd-EOB-DTPA).
    Ngu S; Lebron-Zapata L; Pomeranz C; Katz S; Gerst S; Zheng J; Moskowitz C; Do RK
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Jan; 41(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 26830611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance (MR) Biomarkers for Assessment of Response With Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors: Comparison of the Measurements of Neuroendocrine Tumor Liver Metastases (NETLM) With Various MR Sequences and at Multiple Phases of Contrast Administration.
    Luersen GF; Wei W; Tamm EP; Bhosale PR; Szklaruk J
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2016; 40(5):717-22. PubMed ID: 27636124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR guidance in thermal ablation of liver malignancies.
    Rosenberg C; Jahn A; Pickartz T; Wahnschaffe U; Patrzyk M; Hosten N
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e109217. PubMed ID: 25541950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Optimization of hepatobiliary phase delay time of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for identification of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis of different degrees of severity.
    Wu JW; Yu YC; Qu XL; Zhang Y; Gao H
    World J Gastroenterol; 2018 Jan; 24(3):415-423. PubMed ID: 29391764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Quantitative evaluation of liver function with MRI Using Gd-EOB-DTPA.
    Ryeom HK; Kim SH; Kim JY; Kim HJ; Lee JM; Chang YM; Kim YS; Kang DS
    Korean J Radiol; 2004; 5(4):231-9. PubMed ID: 15637473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of 10- and 20-min hepatobiliary phase images on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI T1 mapping for liver function assessment in clinic.
    Zhou ZP; Long LL; Qiu WJ; Cheng G; Huang LJ; Yang TF; Huang ZK
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Sep; 42(9):2272-2278. PubMed ID: 28396918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.