484 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28365810)
1. A retrospective cephalometric investigation of two fixed functional orthodontic appliances in class II treatment: Functional Mandibular Advancer vs. Herbst appliance.
Kinzinger GSM; Lisson JA; Frye L; Gross U; Hourfar J
Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Jan; 22(1):293-304. PubMed ID: 28365810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Soft tissue profile changes after Functional Mandibular Advancer or Herbst appliance treatment in class II patients.
Hourfar J; Lisson JA; Gross U; Frye L; Kinzinger GSM
Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Mar; 22(2):971-980. PubMed ID: 28721528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cephalometric study of Class II Division 1 patients treated with an extended-duration, reinforced, banded Herbst appliance followed by fixed appliances.
Tomblyn T; Rogers M; Andrews L; Martin C; Tremont T; Gunel E; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):818-830. PubMed ID: 27871709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Changes of epiglottis and hyoid bone position after orthodontic treatment with cast splint fixed functional appliances.
Hourfar J; Lisson JA; Kinzinger GSM
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Mar; 25(3):1525-1534. PubMed ID: 33409688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: Skeletal and dental changes.
Wigal TG; Dischinger T; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):210-23. PubMed ID: 21803259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Maxillary molar distalization or mandibular enhancement: a cephalometric comparison of comprehensive orthodontic treatment including the pendulum and the Herbst appliances.
Burkhardt DR; McNamara JA; Baccetti T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Feb; 123(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 12594414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Treatment effects of the edgewise Herbst appliance: a cephalometric and tomographic investigation.
VanLaecken R; Martin CA; Dischinger T; Razmus T; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):582-93. PubMed ID: 17110255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of fixed appliances in correcting Angle Class II on the depth of the posterior airway space: FMA vs. Herbst appliance--a retrospective cephalometric study.
Kinzinger G; Czapka K; Ludwig B; Glasl B; Gross U; Lisson J
J Orofac Orthop; 2011 Aug; 72(4):301-20. PubMed ID: 21898196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of skeletal and dental changes in patients with a Class II relationship treated with clear aligner mandibular advancement and Herbst appliance followed by comprehensive orthodontic treatment.
Hosseini HR; Ngan P; Tai SK; Andrews LJ; Xiang J
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2024 Feb; 165(2):205-219. PubMed ID: 37831020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of stepwise vs single-step advancement with the Functional Mandibular Advancer in Class II division 1 treatment.
Aras I; Pasaoglu A; Olmez S; Unal I; Tuncer AV; Aras A
Angle Orthod; 2017 Jan; 87(1):82-87. PubMed ID: 27366817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of fixed functional orthodontic treatment in hypodivergent and hyperdivergent class II patients-a retrospective cephalometric investigation.
Hourfar J; Kinzinger GSM; Frye L; Lisson JA
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Aug; 27(8):4773-4784. PubMed ID: 37351654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion in adults: stepwise vs single-step advancement with the Herbst appliance.
Purkayastha SK; Rabie AB; Wong R
World J Orthod; 2008; 9(3):233-43. PubMed ID: 18834006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dental and skeletal changes in patients with mandibular retrognathism following treatment with Herbst and pre-adjusted fixed appliance.
de Abreu Vigorito F; Dominguez GC; de Arruda Aidar LA
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 24713559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dentoskeletal effects of Twin Block and Herbst appliances in patients with Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathy.
Baysal A; Uysal T
Eur J Orthod; 2014 Apr; 36(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 24663007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effectiveness of incremental vs maximum bite advancement during Herbst appliance therapy in late adolescent and young adult patients.
Amuk NG; Baysal A; Coskun R; Kurt G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Jan; 155(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 30591165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does mandibular advancement with clear aligners have the same skeletal and dentoalveolar effects as traditional functional appliances?
Wu Y; Yu Q; Xia Y; Wang B; Chen S; Gu K; Zhang B; Zhu M
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Feb; 23(1):65. PubMed ID: 36732724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Dentaoalveolar changes in young adult patients with class II/1 malocclusion treated with the herbst appliance and an activator].
Nedeljković N; Sćepan I; Glisić B; Marković E
Vojnosanit Pregl; 2010 Feb; 67(2):170-5. PubMed ID: 20337101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dental skeletal effects of the metallic splinted Herbst appliance after growth spurt: a lateral oblique cephalometric assessment.
Raveli TB; Raveli DB; Gandini LG; Santos-Pinto A
Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2017 Aug; 30(2):76-82. PubMed ID: 29248942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Treatment effects of the mandibular anterior repositioning appliance on patients with Class II malocclusion.
Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; Berger JL; Chermak DS; Kaczynski R; Simon ES; Haerian A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):286-95. PubMed ID: 12637901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Upper airway changes following single-step or stepwise advancement using the Functional Mandibular Advancer.
Aras I; Pasaoglu A; Olmez S; Unal I; Aras A
J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Nov; 77(6):454-462. PubMed ID: 27770150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
