833 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28365888)
1. Cone beam computed tomography for dental and maxillofacial imaging: technique improvement and low-dose protocols.
Feragalli B; Rampado O; Abate C; Macrì M; Festa F; Stromei F; Caputi S; Guglielmi G
Radiol Med; 2017 Aug; 122(8):581-588. PubMed ID: 28365888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: a radiation dose evaluation.
Silva MA; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Bumann A; Visser H; Hirsch E
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 May; 133(5):640.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18456133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dosimetry of the cone beam computed tomography Veraviewepocs 3D compared with the 3D Accuitomo in different fields of view.
Hirsch E; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Silva MA
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):268-73. PubMed ID: 18606748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of CBCT exposure conditions on radiation dose.
Palomo JM; Rao PS; Hans MG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jun; 105(6):773-82. PubMed ID: 18424119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effective radiation dose and eye lens dose in dental cone beam CT: effect of field of view and angle of rotation.
Pauwels R; Zhang G; Theodorakou C; Walker A; Bosmans H; Jacobs R; Bogaerts R; Horner K;
Br J Radiol; 2014 Oct; 87(1042):20130654. PubMed ID: 25189417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Absorbed doses for patients undergoing panoramic radiography, cephalometric radiography and CBCT.
Wrzesień M; Olszewski J
Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2017 Jul; 30(5):705-713. PubMed ID: 28584324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Kilovoltage cone-beam CT: comparative dose and image quality evaluations in partial and full-angle scan protocols.
Kim S; Yoo S; Yin FF; Samei E; Yoshizumi T
Med Phys; 2010 Jul; 37(7):3648-59. PubMed ID: 20831072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetry of a cone-beam computed tomography machine compared with a digital x-ray machine in orthodontic imaging.
Grünheid T; Kolbeck Schieck JR; Pliska BT; Ahmad M; Larson BE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Apr; 141(4):436-43. PubMed ID: 22464525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Significant reduction in dental cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) eye dose through the use of leaded glasses.
Prins R; Dauer LT; Colosi DC; Quinn B; Kleiman NJ; Bohle GC; Holohan B; Al-Najjar A; Fernandez T; Bonvento M; Faber RD; Ching H; Goren AD
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Oct; 112(4):502-7. PubMed ID: 21802322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mobile C-arm cone-beam CT for guidance of spine surgery: image quality, radiation dose, and integration with interventional guidance.
Schafer S; Nithiananthan S; Mirota DJ; Uneri A; Stayman JW; Zbijewski W; Schmidgunst C; Kleinszig G; Khanna AJ; Siewerdsena JH
Med Phys; 2011 Aug; 38(8):4563-74. PubMed ID: 21928628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative study of the effective radiation doses from cone beam computed tomography and plain radiography for sialography.
Jadu F; Yaffe MJ; Lam EW
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Jul; 39(5):257-63. PubMed ID: 20587648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dose area product in estimation of effective dose of the patients undergoing dental cone beam computed tomography examinations.
Kralik I; Faj D; Lauc T; Škarica M; Popić J; Brkic H
J Radiol Prot; 2018 Dec; 38(4):1412-1427. PubMed ID: 30264736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can modifying shielding, field of view, and exposure settings make the effective dose of a cone-beam computed tomography comparable to traditional radiographs used for orthodontic diagnosis?
Ting S; Attaia D; Johnson KB; Kossa SS; Friedland B; Allareddy V; Masoud MI
Angle Orthod; 2020 Sep; 90(5):655-664. PubMed ID: 33378479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT.
Ludlow JB; Davies-Ludlow LE; Brooks SL; Howerton WB
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):219-26. PubMed ID: 16798915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dose and image quality of cone-beam computed tomography as compared with conventional multislice computed tomography in abdominal imaging.
Schegerer AA; Lechel U; Ritter M; Weisser G; Fink C; Brix G
Invest Radiol; 2014 Oct; 49(10):675-84. PubMed ID: 24853071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using GafChromic film to estimate the effective dose from dental cone beam CT and panoramic radiography.
Al-Okshi A; Nilsson M; Petersson A; Wiese M; Lindh C
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(7):20120343. PubMed ID: 23610090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dosimetry of a cone beam CT device for oral and maxillofacial radiology using Monte Carlo techniques and ICRP adult reference computational phantoms.
Morant JJ; Salvadó M; Hernández-Girón I; Casanovas R; Ortega R; Calzado A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(3):92555893. PubMed ID: 22933532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effective dose from cone beam CT examinations in dentistry.
Roberts JA; Drage NA; Davies J; Thomas DW
Br J Radiol; 2009 Jan; 82(973):35-40. PubMed ID: 18852212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Technical assessment of a cone-beam CT scanner for otolaryngology imaging: image quality, dose, and technique protocols.
Xu J; Reh DD; Carey JP; Mahesh M; Siewerdsen JH
Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):4932-42. PubMed ID: 22894419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dose measurements for dental cone-beam CT: a comparison with MSCT and panoramic imaging.
Deman P; Atwal P; Duzenli C; Thakur Y; Ford NL
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Jun; 59(12):3201-22. PubMed ID: 24862349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
