74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28365934)
1. Organised cervical cancer screening programme in the Belgrade municipality of Cukarica - Evaluation of process indicators.
Milenkovic M; Naumovic T; Perisic Z; Milenkovic D
J BUON; 2017; 22(1):44-47. PubMed ID: 28365934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance indicators collected from primary health centres included in organised cervical cancer screening programme in the Republic of Serbia.
Naumovic T; Jovanovic V; Ilic D; Rakic U; Mirkov D; Perisic Z
J BUON; 2015; 20(3):842-6. PubMed ID: 26214638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The cervical cancer screening programme in Norway, 1992-2000: changes in Pap smear coverage and incidence of cervical cancer.
Nygård JF; Skare GB; Thoresen SØ
J Med Screen; 2002; 9(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 12133929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Divergent coverage, frequency and costs of organised and opportunistic Pap testing in Finland.
Salo H; Nieminen P; Kilpi T; Auranen K; Leino T; Vänskä S; Tiihonen P; Lehtinen M; Anttila A
Int J Cancer; 2014 Jul; 135(1):204-13. PubMed ID: 24347441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Organised Versus Opportunistic Cervical Cancer Screening in Urban and Rural Regions of Lithuania.
Paulauskiene J; Ivanauskiene R; Skrodeniene E; Petkeviciene J
Medicina (Kaunas); 2019 Sep; 55(9):. PubMed ID: 31500116
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of an antepartum Pap smear on the coverage of a cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based prospective study.
Nygård M; Daltveit AK; Thoresen SO; Nygård JF
BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Jan; 7():10. PubMed ID: 17244348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Probability of early repeat Pap smear in an integrated cervical screening programme.
Rosso A; Foglietta F; Naldoni C; Schincaglia P; Buzzi G; Camprincoli S; Serafini M; Busoli S; Leoni F; Grilli N; Bucchi L
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2000 Aug; 9(4):269-74. PubMed ID: 10958330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The implementation of an organised cervical screening programme in Poland: an analysis of the adherence to European guidelines.
Nowakowski A; Cybulski M; Śliwczyński A; Chil A; Teter Z; Seroczyński P; Arbyn M; Anttila A
BMC Cancer; 2015 Apr; 15():279. PubMed ID: 25879466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of implementing a nationwide cervical cancer screening program on female population coverage by Pap-tests in Estonia.
Veerus P; Arbyn M; Amati C; Paolo B;
Tumori; 2010; 96(4):524-8. PubMed ID: 20968130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The coverage of cervical screening in Hungary].
Boncz I; Sebestyén A; Döbrossy L; Kovács A; Budai A; Székely T
Orv Hetil; 2007 Nov; 148(46):2177-82. PubMed ID: 17988975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The cancer screening monitoring system: indicators for organised programmes and possible extension to spontaneous screening.
Giorgi Rossi P; Federici A; Zappa M
Pathologica; 2013 Jun; 105(3):83-5. PubMed ID: 24047033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Attitudes toward cervical cancer screening among women receiving human papillomavirus vaccination in a university-hospital-based community: interim 2-year follow-up results.
Miyagi E; Sukegawa A; Motoki Y; Kaneko T; Maruyama Y; Asai-Sato M; Numazaki R; Mizushima S; Hirahara F
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Apr; 40(4):1105-13. PubMed ID: 24428631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cervical cancer risk levels in Turkey and compliance to the national cervical cancer screening standard.
Açikgöz A; Ergör G
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(4):923-7. PubMed ID: 21790227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cancer screening uptake: association with individual characteristics, geographic distribution, and time trends in Italy.
Carrozzi G; Sampaolo L; Bolognesi L; Sardonini L; Bertozzi N; Giorgi Rossi P; Zappa M; Baldissera S; Campostrini S; Ferrante G; Masocco M; Minardi V; D'Argenzio A; Moghadam PF; Quarchioni E; Ramigni M; Trinito MO; Salmaso S;
Epidemiol Prev; 2015; 39(3 Suppl 1):9-18. PubMed ID: 26405772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimation of Pap-test coverage in an area with an organised screening program: challenges for survey methods.
Giorgi Rossi P; Esposito G; Brezzi S; Brachini A; Raggi P; Federici A
BMC Health Serv Res; 2006 Mar; 6():36. PubMed ID: 16545125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can a home-visit invitation increase Pap smear screening in Samliem, Khon Kaen, Thailand?
Chalapati W; Chumworathayi B
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2007; 8(1):119-23. PubMed ID: 17477785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The coverage of cervical cancer screening in Khon Kaen, northeast Thailand.
Kritpetcharat O; Suwanrungruang K; Sriamporn S; Kamsa-Ard S; Kritpetcharat P; Pengsaa P
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2003; 4(2):103-5. PubMed ID: 12875621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The 1996 revision of the Dutch cervical cancer screening programme: increased coverage, fewer repeat smears and less opportunistic screening].
Berkers LM; van Ballegooijen M; van Kemenade FJ; Rebolj M; Essink-Bot ML; Helmerhorst TJ; Habbema JD
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2007 Jun; 151(23):1288-94. PubMed ID: 17624160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Self-sampling versus reminder letter: effects on cervical cancer screening attendance and coverage in Finland.
Virtanen A; Anttila A; Luostarinen T; Nieminen P
Int J Cancer; 2011 Jun; 128(11):2681-7. PubMed ID: 20669228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. New software for collecting data from the organized cervical cancer screening program in Serbia. Are we on the threshold of a new screening registry? - A multicentric study.
Naumovic T; Lakic V; Jovicevic A; Ilic D; Milosevic P; Stevic-Gajic V; Antonijevic A; Milovanovic N; Magdic I; Koricanac R; Malkov S; Grkavac I; Mihajlovic M; Djuricic S; Zivkovic B; Stegic U; Milovanovic Z; Opric D; Knezevic M; Jovanovic V; Todorovic Z; Todorovic D
J BUON; 2017; 22(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 28365936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
