BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

507 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28366038)

  • 1. Perceived self-efficacy and specific self-reported outcomes in persons with lower-limb amputation using a non-microprocessor-controlled versus a microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee.
    Möller S; Hagberg K; Samulesson K; Ramstrand N
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2018 Apr; 13(3):220-225. PubMed ID: 28366038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using a microprocessor knee (C-Leg) with appropriate foot transitioned individuals with dysvascular transfemoral amputations to higher performance levels: a longitudinal randomized clinical trial.
    Jayaraman C; Mummidisetty CK; Albert MV; Lipschutz R; Hoppe-Ludwig S; Mathur G; Jayaraman A
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2021 May; 18(1):88. PubMed ID: 34034753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enhancement of a prosthetic knee with a microprocessor-controlled gait phase switch reduces falls and improves balance confidence and gait speed in community ambulators with unilateral transfemoral amputation.
    Fuenzalida Squella SA; Kannenberg A; Brandão Benetti Â
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Apr; 42(2):228-235. PubMed ID: 28691574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of transfemoral amputees using a passive microprocessor-controlled knee versus an active powered microprocessor-controlled knee for level walking.
    Creylman V; Knippels I; Janssen P; Biesbrouck E; Lechler K; Peeraer L
    Biomed Eng Online; 2016 Dec; 15(Suppl 3):142. PubMed ID: 28105945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does a microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee affect stair ascent strategies in persons with transfemoral amputation?
    Aldridge Whitehead JM; Wolf EJ; Scoville CR; Wilken JM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Oct; 472(10):3093-101. PubMed ID: 24515402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Benefits of the Genium microprocessor controlled prosthetic knee on ambulation, mobility, activities of daily living and quality of life: a systematic literature review.
    Mileusnic MP; Rettinger L; Highsmith MJ; Hahn A
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2021 Jul; 16(5):453-464. PubMed ID: 31469023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Functional added value of microprocessor-controlled knee joints in daily life performance of Medicare Functional Classification Level-2 amputees.
    Theeven P; Hemmen B; Rings F; Meys G; Brink P; Smeets R; Seelen H
    J Rehabil Med; 2011 Oct; 43(10):906-15. PubMed ID: 21947182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of advanced prosthetic knee joints on perceived performance and everyday life activity level of low-functional persons with a transfemoral amputation or knee disarticulation.
    Theeven PJ; Hemmen B; Geers RP; Smeets RJ; Brink PR; Seelen HA
    J Rehabil Med; 2012 May; 44(5):454-61. PubMed ID: 22549656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mobility and satisfaction with a microprocessor-controlled knee in moderately active amputees: A multi-centric randomized crossover trial.
    Lansade C; Vicaut E; Paysant J; Ménager D; Cristina MC; Braatz F; Domayer S; Pérennou D; Chiesa G
    Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2018 Sep; 61(5):278-285. PubMed ID: 29753888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of patient-reported and functional outcomes following transition from mechanical to microprocessor knee in the low-activity user with a unilateral transfemoral amputation.
    Davie-Smith F; Carse B
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2021 Jun; 45(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 34016872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The comparison of transfemoral amputees using mechanical and microprocessor- controlled prosthetic knee under different walking speeds: A randomized cross-over trial.
    Cao W; Yu H; Zhao W; Meng Q; Chen W
    Technol Health Care; 2018; 26(4):581-592. PubMed ID: 29710741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees on self-reported mobility, quality of life, and psychological states in patients with transfemoral amputations.
    Şen Eİ; Aydın T; Buğdaycı D; Kesiktaş FN
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2020 Sep; 54(5):502-506. PubMed ID: 33155559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reduced cortical brain activity with the use of microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees during walking.
    Möller S; Rusaw D; Hagberg K; Ramstrand N
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Jun; 43(3):257-265. PubMed ID: 30375285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Safety and function of a prototype microprocessor-controlled knee prosthesis for low active transfemoral amputees switching from a mechanic knee prosthesis: a pilot study.
    Hasenoehrl T; Schmalz T; Windhager R; Domayer S; Dana S; Ambrozy C; Palma S; Crevenna R
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2018 Feb; 13(2):157-165. PubMed ID: 28399722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Degree of Safety Against Falls Provided by 4 Different Prosthetic Knee Types in People With Transfemoral Amputation: A Retrospective Observational Study.
    Palumbo P; Randi P; Moscato S; Davalli A; Chiari L
    Phys Ther; 2022 Apr; 102(4):. PubMed ID: 35079822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mobility analysis of amputees (MAAT 3): Matching individuals based on comorbid health reveals improved function for above-knee prosthesis users with microprocessor knee technology.
    Wurdeman SR; Stevens PM; Campbell JH
    Assist Technol; 2020 Sep; 32(5):236-242. PubMed ID: 30592436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of a stance phase microprocessor-controlled knee prosthesis on level walking in lower functioning individuals with a transfemoral amputation.
    Eberly VJ; Mulroy SJ; Gronley JK; Perry J; Yule WJ; Burnfield JM
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2014 Dec; 38(6):447-55. PubMed ID: 24135259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Benefits of a microprocessor-controlled prosthetic foot for ascending and descending slopes.
    Ernst M; Altenburg B; Schmalz T; Kannenberg A; Bellmann M
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2022 Jan; 19(1):9. PubMed ID: 35090505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intra-individual biomechanical effects of a non-microprocessor-controlled stance-yielding prosthetic knee during ramp descent in persons with unilateral transfemoral amputation.
    Okita Y; Yamasaki N; Nakamura T; Mita T; Kubo T; Mitsumoto A; Akune T
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Feb; 43(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 30051754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The utility of the single-subject method for comparison of temporal-spatial gait changes between a microprocessor and non-microprocessor prosthetic knees.
    Howard CL; Wallace C; Perry B; Stokic DS
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2020 Jun; 44(3):133-144. PubMed ID: 32186241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.